This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily
Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal
Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official
electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal
Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the
corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the
daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial
informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal
Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.
For complete information about, and access to, our official publications
and services, go to
About the Federal Register
on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable
regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of
establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned
publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that
the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with
the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for
legal research should verify their results against an official edition of
the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML
rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not
provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
Rule
Enter a search term or FR citation e.g.
88 FR 38230 FR 78782024-13208USDA09/05/24RULE0503-AA39SORN
Choosing an item from
full text search results
will bring you to those results. Pressing enter in the search box
will also bring you to search results.
Choosing an item from
suggestions
will bring you directly to the content.
This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the
headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents.
This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links
has no substantive legal effect.
Document page views are updated periodically throughout the day and are
cumulative counts for this document. Counts are subject to sampling,
reprocessing and revision (up or down) throughout the day.
Page views
681
as of
10/11/2026 at 10:15 pm EDT
Other Formats
Enhanced Content - Other Formats
This document is also available in the following formats:
This PDF is FR Doc. 2020-21122 as it appeared on Public Inspection on
09/28/2020 at 8:45 am.
If you are using public inspection listings for legal research, you
should verify the contents of the documents against a final, official
edition of the Federal Register. Only official editions of the
Federal Register provide legal notice of publication to the public and judicial notice
to the courts under 44 U.S.C. 1503 & 1507.
Learn more here.
Published Document: 2020-21122 (85 FR 61502)
This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.
AGENCY:
Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense (DoD).
ACTION:
Final rule.
SUMMARY:
DoD is issuing a final rule amending the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to implement the inflation adjustment of acquisition-related dollar thresholds. A statute requires an adjustment every five years of acquisition-related thresholds for inflation using the Consumer Price Index for all urban consumers, except for the Construction Wage Rate Requirements statute (Davis-Bacon Act), Service Contract Labor Standards statute, and trade agreements
( printed page 61503)
thresholds. DoD also used the same methodology to adjust some nonstatutory DFARS acquisition-related thresholds.
DATES:
Effective October 1, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ms. Kimberly R. Ziegler, Telephone 571-372-6095.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
This rule amends multiple DFARS parts to further implement 41 U.S.C. 1908. Section 1908 requires an adjustment every five years (on October 1 of each year evenly divisible by five) of statutory acquisition-related thresholds for inflation, using the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for all urban consumers, except for the Construction Wage Rate Requirements statute (Davis-Bacon Act), Service Contract Labor Standards statute, and trade agreements thresholds (see FAR 1.109). As a matter of policy, DoD also uses the same methodology to adjust some nonstatutory DFARS acquisition-related thresholds.
DoD published a proposed rule in the
Federal Register
at 85 FR 19716 on April 8, 2020. The preamble to the proposed rule contained detailed explanation of—
What an acquisition-related threshold is;
What acquisition-related thresholds are not subject to escalation adjustment under this case; and
How DoD analyzes statutory and non-statutory acquisition-related thresholds.
No respondents submitted public comments in response to the proposed rule.
II. Discussion and Analysis
Although there were no public comments, two corrections were made to the final rule to: (1) Add the threshold at DFARS 215.403-1(c)(4)(B) and 225.7201; and (2) update the threshold pointer, an address, and web page citation at DFARS 252.225-7004.
Although the actual CPI of 258.115 for March 2020 was lower than the projected CPI of 258.606 for March 2020 used for the proposed rule, the difference was insignificant and did not result in revisions to any proposed threshold increases. The final rule is based on the actual CPI of 258.115 for March 2020. The CPI as of the end of March 2020, 6 months before the effective date of the rule, is used as the cutoff in order to allow time for approval and publication of the final rule.
III. Applicability to Contracts at or Below the Simplified Acquisition Threshold and for Commercial Items, Including Commercially Available Off-the-Shelf Items
This rule does not create any new provisions or clauses, nor does it change the applicability of any existing provisions or clauses included in solicitations and contracts valued at or below the simplified acquisition threshold, or for commercial items, including COTS items.
IV. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not subject to review under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804.
The rule is not subject to E.O. 13771, because this rule is not a significant regulatory action under E.O. 12866.
VI. Regulatory Flexibility Act.
DoD has prepared a Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA) consistent with the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601,
et seq.
The FRFA is summarized as follows:
This rule amends the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement to implement 41 U.S.C. 1908 and other acquisition-related dollar thresholds that are based on policy rather than statute in order to adjust for the changing value of the dollar. 41 U.S.C. 1908 requires adjustment every five years of statutory acquisition-related dollar thresholds, except for Construction Wage Rate Requirements statute (Davis-Bacon Act), Service Contract Labor Standards statute, and trade agreements thresholds. While reviewing all statutory acquisition-related thresholds, this case presented an opportunity to also review all nonstatutory acquisition-related thresholds in the DFARS that are based on policy. The objective of the rule is to maintain the status quo, by adjusting acquisition-related thresholds for inflation.
This rule will likely affect to some extent all small business concerns that submit offers or are awarded contracts by the Department of Defense (DoD). However, the threshold changes in this rule are not expected to have any significant economic impact on small business concerns because they are intended to maintain the status quo by adjusting for changes in the value of the dollar. Data generated from the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) for fiscal years 2017 through 2019, indicates that the DoD has awarded an average of 1,494,202 contracts to 56,851 unique small entities during the three year period. It is assumed that all 56,851 unique small entities may be affected by this rule, however, the impact will most likely be beneficial, by preventing burdensome requirements from applying to more and more acquisitions, as the dollar loses value.
The rule does not impose any new reporting, recordkeeping, or compliance requirements. Changes in thresholds for approved information collection requirements are intended to maintain the status quo and prevent those requirements from increasing over time.
There are no practical alternatives that will accomplish the objectives of the statute.
VII. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act does apply. The changes to the DFARS do not impose new information collection requirements that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under 44 U.S.C. 3501,
et seq.
By adjusting the thresholds for inflation, the status quo for the current information collection requirements are maintained under OMB clearance numbers 0704-0229, DFARS Part 225, Foreign Acquisition and related clauses and 0704-0286, DFARS Part 205, Publicizing Contract Actions and Provision of Information to Cooperative Agreement Holders.
8. Amend section 217.170 in paragraphs (d)(1)(iv) and (d)(5) introductory text by removing “$135.5 million” and adding “$150 million” in its place in both places.
10. Amend section 217.172 in paragraphs (c), (d), and (f)(1) and (2) by removing “$678.5 million” and adding “$750 million” in its place wherever it appears.
10 U.S.C. 2410g requires offerors and contractors to notify DoD of any intention to perform any part of a DoD contract outside the United States and Canada that—
(a) Exceeds $750,000 in value; and
(b) Could be performed inside the United States or Canada.
a. In paragraph (b)(2)(i) by removing “$93 million” and adding “$100 million” in its place; and
b. In paragraph (b)(2)(ii) introductory text by removing “Director, Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy” and adding “Principal Director, Defense Pricing and Contracting” in its place and by removing “$93 million” and adding “$100 million” in its place.
15. Amend section 236.303-1 in paragraph (a)(4)(i) introductory text and (a)(4)(ii) by removing “$4 million” and adding “$4.5 million” in its place in both places.
a. Removing the clause date “(MAY 2019)” and adding “(OCT 2020)” in its place;
b. In paragraph (b)(1), removing “225.870-4(c)(2)(i)(A)( 1)” and adding 225.7201(a)” in its place;
c. In paragraph (c)(5) removing “Deputy Director of Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy (Contract Policy and International Contracting), OUSD(AT&L) DPAP/CPIC” and adding “Principal Director, Defense Pricing and Contracting (Contract Policy), OUSD(A&S) DPC/CP” in its place; and