Skip to Content

We invite you to try out our new beta eCFR site at https://ecfr.federalregister.gov. We’ve made big changes to make the eCFR easier to use. Be sure to leave feedback using the 'Feedback' button on the bottom right of each page!

Proposed Rule

Safety Management Systems for Domestic Passenger Vessels

Document Details

Information about this document as published in the Federal Register.

Document Statistics
Document page views are updated periodically throughout the day and are cumulative counts for this document. Counts are subject to sampling, reprocessing and revision (up or down) throughout the day.
Enhanced Content

Relevant information about this document from Regulations.gov provides additional context. This information is not part of the official Federal Register document.

Published Document

This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.

Start Preamble

AGENCY:

Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION:

Advance notice of proposed rulemaking; correction.

SUMMARY:

The Coast Guard is correcting an advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) published in the Federal Register of January 15, 2021, seeking public comment on the potential use of Safety Management Systems (SMSs) to improve safety and reduce marine casualties on board U.S.-flagged passenger vessels. The ANPRM contained an incorrect internal cross-reference in the list of questions for the public.

DATES:

March 1, 2021.

Start Further Info

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For information about this document, call or email Lieutenant Kimberly Gates, Vessel and Facility Operating Standards Division (CG-OES-2), U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 202-372-1455, email kimberly.m.gates@uscg.mil.

End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

In FR Doc. 2021-01058, beginning on page 3899 in the issue of January 15, 2021, make the following correction in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section:

On page 3902 in the third column, in the paragraph for Question 19, replace the text “question 4” with the text “question 6.”

The corrected Question 19 reads as follows: “How would the costs and benefits of expanding other existing regulations, as detailed in question 6, differ from the costs and benefits of requiring SMSs for all passenger vessels?”

Start Signature

Dated: February 19, 2021.

M.T. Cunningham,

Chief, Office of Regulations and Administrative Law, U.S. Coast Guard.

End Signature End Supplemental Information

[FR Doc. 2021-04011 Filed 2-26-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9110-04-P