This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily
Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal
Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official
electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal
Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the
corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the
daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial
informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal
Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.
For complete information about, and access to, our official publications
and services, go to
About the Federal Register
on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable
regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of
establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned
publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that
the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with
the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for
legal research should verify their results against an official edition of
the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML
rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not
provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
Notice
Enter a search term or FR citation e.g.
88 FR 38230 FR 78782024-13208USDA09/05/24RULE0503-AA39SORN
Choosing an item from
full text search results
will bring you to those results. Pressing enter in the search box
will also bring you to search results.
Choosing an item from
suggestions
will bring you directly to the content.
This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the
headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents.
This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links
has no substantive legal effect.
Document page views are updated periodically throughout the day and are
cumulative counts for this document. Counts are subject to sampling,
reprocessing and revision (up or down) throughout the day.
Page views
247
as of
10/14/2026 at 4:15 pm EDT
Other Formats
Enhanced Content - Other Formats
This document is also available in the following formats:
This PDF is FR Doc. 2021-14748 as it appeared on Public Inspection on
07/09/2021 at 8:45 am.
It was viewed
13
times while on Public Inspection.
If you are using public inspection listings for legal research, you
should verify the contents of the documents against a final, official
edition of the Federal Register. Only official editions of the
Federal Register provide legal notice of publication to the public and judicial notice
to the courts under 44 U.S.C. 1503 & 1507.
Learn more here.
Published Document: 2021-14748 (86 FR 36522)
This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.
AGENCY:
Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY:
The Department of Commerce (Commerce) is rescinding the administrative review of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on aluminum wire and cable from the People's Republic of China (China) for the period of review (POR) April 8, 2019, through December 31, 2019.
DATES:
Applicable July 12, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Caitlin Monks, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2670.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On December 2, 2020, Commerce published in the
Federal Register
a notice of opportunity to request an administrative review of the CVD order on aluminum wire and cable from China covering the POR.[1]
On December 31, 2020, Commerce received timely requests for review of several companies from Encore Wire Corporation (Encore) and Southwire Company LLC
( printed page 36523)
(collectively, the petitioners),[2]
and separately, Repwire LLC (Repwire).[3]
On February 4, 2020, in accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), Commerce published in the
Federal Register
a notice initiating an administrative review of ICF Cable and Jin Tiong Electrical Materials Manufacturer PTE. Limited (Jin Tiong) (collectively, the Companies Subject to the Review).[4]
On February 10, 2021, we notified interested parties that information from U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)'s database, which is comprised of actual U.S. entries of subject merchandise, indicated that there were no POR entries of aluminum wire and cable from China that are subject to CVD duties with respect to the Companies Subject to the Review.[5]
We invited interested parties to comment on the CBP Entry Data.[6]
On February 18, 2021, Encore submitted comments in response to the CBP Entry Data, alleging that ICF Cable exported Chinese-origin subject merchandise to the United States during the POR, and requested that Commerce select ICF Cable as a mandatory respondent in the instant review.[7]
On March 26, 2021, we requested that CBP confirm whether any shipments of aluminum wire and cable from China, produced and/or exported by ICF Cable or Jin Tiong entered the United States during the POR.[8]
On April 1, 2021, CBP confirmed that there were no shipments of subject merchandise produced and/or exported by ICF Cable or Jin Tiong during the POR.[9]
We invited interested parties to comment on CBP's Confirmation of No Shipments.[10]
On April 19, 2021, Encore submitted timely comments in response to CBP's Confirmation of No Shipments.[11]
In its comments, Encore reiterated its claim that ICF Cable made sales, shipments, and/or exports of aluminum wire and cable produced in China during the POR without paying applicable cash deposits, and requested that Commerce issue a quantity and value questionnaire to ICF Cable.[12]
Our analysis of the record leads us to conclude that there are no reviewable entries of aluminum wire and cable from China during the POR. For a full discussion of the comments raised by Encore and our analysis,
see
the Rescission Memorandum.[13]
Rescission of Review
It is Commerce's practice to rescind an administrative review of a CVD order, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), when there are no reviewable entries of subject merchandise during the POR for which liquidation is suspended.[14]
Normally, upon completion of an administrative review, the suspended entries are liquidated at the CVD assessment rate calculated for the review period.[15]
Therefore, for an administrative review to be conducted, there must be a reviewable, suspended entry that Commerce can instruct CBP to liquidate at the CVD assessment rate calculated for the review period.[16]
Accordingly, in the absence of suspended entries of subject merchandise during the POR for either of the companies named in the
Initiation Notice, we are hereby rescinding this administrative review in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3).
Assessment Rates
Commerce will instruct CBP to assess countervailing duties on all appropriate entries. Because Commerce is rescinding this review in its entirety, the entries to which this administrative review pertained shall be assessed at rates equal to the cash deposit of estimated countervailing duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). Commerce intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the publication of this notice in the
Federal Register
.
Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order
This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to the administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction.
Notification to Interested Parties
This determination is issued and published pursuant to sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Dated: July 6, 2021.
James Maeder,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations.
Footnotes
1.
See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity to Request Administrative Review, 85 FR 77433 (December 2, 2020) (
Opportunity Notice).
3.
See
Repwire's Letter, “Aluminum Wire and Cable from the People's Republic of China, C-570-096; Request for Administrative Review,” dated December 31, 2020.
7.
See
Encore's Letter, “Aluminum Wire and Cable from the People's Republic of China: Comments on Customs Data and Respondent Selection,” dated February 18, 2021 (Encore's Respondent Selection Comments).
8.
See
Memorandum, “Aluminum Wire and Cable from the People's Republic of China; No Shipment Inquiry for ICF Cable and Jin Tiong Electrical Materials Manufacturer PTE. Limited during the period 04/08/2019 through 12/31/2019,” dated April 13, 2021 (CBP's Confirmation of No Shipments) at Attachment.
11.
See
Encore's Letter, “Aluminum Wire and Cable from the People's Republic of China: Comments on CBP No Shipments Response,” dated April 19, 2021 (Encore's Rebuttal Comments).
14.
See, e.g., Lightweight Thermal Paper from the People's Republic of China: Notice of Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2015, 82 FR 14349 (March 20, 2017).