This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily
Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal
Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official
electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal
Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the
corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the
daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial
informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal
Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.
For complete information about, and access to, our official publications
and services, go to
About the Federal Register
on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable
regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of
establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned
publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that
the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with
the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for
legal research should verify their results against an official edition of
the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML
rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not
provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
Notice
Enter a search term or FR citation e.g.
88 FR 38230 FR 78782024-13208USDA09/05/24RULE0503-AA39SORN
Choosing an item from
full text search results
will bring you to those results. Pressing enter in the search box
will also bring you to search results.
Choosing an item from
suggestions
will bring you directly to the content.
This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the
headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents.
This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links
has no substantive legal effect.
Comments are no longer being accepted.
See DATES for details.
Regulations.gov Data
Enhanced Content - Regulations.gov Data
FederalRegister.gov retrieves relevant information about this document
from Regulations.gov to provide users with additional context. This
information is not part of the official Federal Register document.
Inconsequential Noncompliance Petition - Maserati North America, Inc. (FMVSS No. 110)
Document page views are updated periodically throughout the day and are
cumulative counts for this document. Counts are subject to sampling,
reprocessing and revision (up or down) throughout the day.
Page views
128
as of
10/17/2026 at 8:15 pm EDT
Other Formats
Enhanced Content - Other Formats
This document is also available in the following formats:
This PDF is FR Doc. 2022-13081 as it appeared on Public Inspection on
06/16/2022 at 8:45 am.
It was viewed
4
times while on Public Inspection.
If you are using public inspection listings for legal research, you
should verify the contents of the documents against a final, official
edition of the Federal Register. Only official editions of the
Federal Register provide legal notice of publication to the public and judicial notice
to the courts under 44 U.S.C. 1503 & 1507.
Learn more here.
Published Document: 2022-13081 (87 FR 36576)
This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.
AGENCY:
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION:
Receipt of petition.
SUMMARY:
Maserati North America, Inc. (“MNA”), has determined that certain Model Year (MY) 2017 2021 Maserati Levante motor vehicles do not fully comply with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 110,
Tire selection and rims and motor home/recreation vehicle trailer load carrying capacity information for motor vehicles with a GVWR of 4,536 kilograms (10,000 pounds) or less.
MNA filed an original noncompliance report dated June 7, 2021, and subsequently petitioned NHTSA on June 24, 2021, for a decision that the subject noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety. This notice announces receipt of MNA's petition.
DATES:
Send comments on or before July 18, 2022.
ADDRESSES:
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments on this petition. Comments must refer to the docket and notice number cited in the title of this notice and submitted by any of the following methods:
Mail:
Send comments by mail addressed to the U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery:
Deliver comments by hand to the U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590. The Docket Section is open on weekdays from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. except for Federal holidays.
Electronically:
Submit comments electronically by logging onto the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) website at
https://www.regulations.gov/.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments.
Comments may also be faxed to (202) 493-2251.
Comments must be written in the English language and be no greater than 15 pages in length, although there is no limit to the length of necessary attachments to the comments. If comments are submitted in hard copy form, please ensure that two copies are provided. If you wish to receive confirmation that comments you have submitted by mail were received, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard with the comments. Note that all comments received will be posted without change to
https://www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information provided.
All comments and supporting materials received before the close of business on the closing date indicated above will be filed in the docket and will be considered. All comments and supporting materials received after the closing date will also be filed and will be considered to the fullest extent possible.
When the petition is granted or denied, notice of the decision will also be published in the
Federal Register
pursuant to the authority indicated at the end of this notice.
All comments, background documentation, and supporting materials submitted to the docket may be viewed by anyone at the address and times given above. The documents may also be viewed on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov
by following the online instructions for accessing the docket. The docket ID number for this petition is shown in the heading of this notice.
DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement is available for review in a
Federal Register
notice published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477—78).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ahmad Barnes, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, NHTSA, (202) 366-7236.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Overview
MNA has determined that certain MY 2017 2021 Maserati Levante motor vehicles do not fully comply with the requirements of paragraph S4.3(c) of FMVSS No. 110,
Tire selection and rims and motor home/recreation vehicle trailer load carrying capacity information for motor vehicles with a GVWR of 4,536 kilograms (10,000 pounds) or less
(49 CFR 571.110). MNA filed a noncompliance report dated June 7, 2021, pursuant to 49 CFR part 573,
Defect and Noncompliance Responsibility and Reports.
MNA subsequently petitioned NHTSA on June 24, 2021, for an exemption from the notification and remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301 on the basis that this noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) and 49 CFR part 556,
Exemption for Inconsequential Defect or Noncompliance.
This notice of receipt of MNA's petition is published under 49 U.S.C. 30118 and 30120 and does not represent any Agency decision or other exercise of judgment concerning the merits of the petition.
II. Vehicles Involved
Approximately 2,917 MY 2017 2021 Maserati Levante motor vehicles equipped with 21-inch and 22-inch tires and manufactured between July 14, 2016, and May 3, 2021, are potentially involved.
III. Noncompliance
MNA explains that the noncompliance is that the subject vehicles are equipped with a vehicle placard affixed to the driver's side B-pillar erroneously understating the maximum permissible cold tire pressure and therefore, do not fully meet the requirements specified in paragraph S4.3(c) of FMVSS No. 110. Specifically, the vehicle placards for the subject vehicles state that the rear 265/40 R21 (105Y) XL and 105W XL tires have a maximum cold tire pressure of 36 psi, when it should state a maximum cold tire pressure of 38 psi, the front 265/35 ZR22 (102Y) XL tires state a maximum cold tire pressure of 33 psi, when it should state a maximum cold tire pressure of 36 psi, and the rear 295/30 ZR22 (103Y) XL tires state a maximum cold tire pressure of 36 psi, when it should state a maximum cold tire pressure of 40 psi.
IV. Rule Requirements
Paragraph S4.3(c) of FMVSS No. 110 includes the requirements relevant to this petition. Each vehicle, except for a trailer or incomplete vehicle, shall show the information specified in S4.3(a) through (g), and may show, at the manufacturer's option, the information specified in S4.3(h) and (i), on a placard permanently affixed to the driver's side B-pillar. This information shall be in the English language and conform in color and format, not including the border surrounding the entire placard, as shown in the example set forth in Figure 1 in this standard. At the manufacturer's
( printed page 36577)
option, the information specified in S4.3 (c), (d), and, as appropriate, (h) and (i) may be shown, alternatively to being shown on the placard, on a tire inflation pressure label which must conform in color and format, not including the border surrounding the entire label, as shown in the example set forth in Figure 2 in this standard.
V. Summary of MNA's Petition
The following views and arguments presented in this section, “V. Summary of MNA's Petition,” are the views and arguments provided by MNA. They have not been evaluated by the Agency and do not reflect the views of the Agency. MNA describes the subject noncompliance and contends that the noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety.
In support of its petition, MNA submitted the following reasoning:
1. The incorrect pressure values are all within the range of acceptable tire inflation and would not cause a Tire Pressure Monitoring System (“TPMS”) alert.
a. The affected Maserati Levante vehicles are compliant with FMVSS No. 138.
b. Consistent with FMVSS No. 138, the TPMS illuminates at equal to or less than the pressure 25 percent below the correct vehicle manufacturer's recommended cold inflation pressure. The TPMS warning telltale will illuminate prior to the tire pressure dropping to the range of 24.7-27 PSI on the affected Maserati Levante vehicles, which is significantly above the 23.2 PSI requirement called out, and tested to, in FMVSS No. 139 (discussed below).
c. Maserati believes the warning provided by the TPMS will give drivers ample time to check and inflate tires well before low tire inflation becomes a safety concern.
2. The subject tires passed a low-inflation-pressure performance test.
a. The affected Maserati Levante vehicles are equipped with tires that are compliant with FMVSS No. 139.
b. Tire manufacturers are required to certify the tires meet all applicable requirements of FMVSS No. 139.
c. FMVSS No. 139 specifies a low-inflation-pressure performance test in which the tire is loaded to its maximum tire load capacity and inflated to only 160 kPa (23.2 PSI), significantly less than the TPMS telltale activation pressure for the subject Maserati Levante vehicles. In order to pass this test, the tires are loaded to 100 percent of the tire's maximum load-carrying capacity and then run on a test axle for 1.5 hours at 23.2 PSI.
3. MNA is not aware of any crashes, injuries, or customer complaints associated with this condition.
4. NHTSA has previously granted inconsequential treatment for FMVSS No. 110 noncompliance for incorrect vehicle placard values; see examples below:
a. General Motors, LLC, 83 FR 24162 (May 24, 2018);
b. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc., 81 FR 38772 (June 14, 2016); and
c. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, 82 FR 17515 (April 11, 2017).
MNA concludes that the subject noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety and that its petition to be exempted from providing notification of the noncompliance, as required by 49 U.S.C. 30118, and a remedy for the noncompliance, as required by 49 U.S.C. 30120, should be granted.
NHTSA notes that the statutory provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to file petitions for a determination of inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to exempt manufacturers only from the duties found in sections 30118 and 30120, respectively, to notify owners, purchasers, and dealers of a defect or noncompliance and to remedy the defect or noncompliance. Therefore, any decision on this petition only applies to the subject vehicles that MNA no longer controlled at the time it determined that the noncompliance existed. However, any decision on this petition does not relieve vehicle distributors and dealers of the prohibitions on the sale, offer for sale, or introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate commerce of the noncompliant vehicles under their control after MNA notified them that the subject noncompliance existed.