This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily
Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal
Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official
electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal
Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the
corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the
daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial
informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal
Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.
For complete information about, and access to, our official publications
and services, go to
About the Federal Register
on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable
regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of
establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned
publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that
the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with
the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for
legal research should verify their results against an official edition of
the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML
rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not
provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
Proposed Rule
Enter a search term or FR citation e.g.
88 FR 38230 FR 78782024-13208USDA09/05/24RULE0503-AA39SORN
Choosing an item from
full text search results
will bring you to those results. Pressing enter in the search box
will also bring you to search results.
Choosing an item from
suggestions
will bring you directly to the content.
Environmental Defense Fund, Maricel Maffini, Breast Cancer Prevention Partners, Clean Water Action/Clean Water Fund, Consumer Reports, Endocrine Society, Environmental Working Group, Healthy Babies Bright Futures, Linda Birnbaum, and the Nicholas School of the Environment at Duke University; Filing of Food Additive Petition
The food additive petition was filed on May 2, 2022. Submit either electronic or written comments on the filing notice by September 9, 2022.
Table of Contents
Enhanced Content - Table of Contents
This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the
headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents.
This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links
has no substantive legal effect.
Environmental Defense Fund, Maricel Maffini, Breast Cancer Prevention Partners, Clean Water Action/Clean Water Fund, Consumer Reports, Endocrine Society, Environmental Working Group, Healthy Babies Bright Futures, Linda Birnbaum, and the Nicholas School of the Environment at Duke University; Filing of Food Additive Petition
Public Comments
Enhanced Content - Public Comments
Comments are no longer being accepted.
See DATES for details.
7 comments have
been received at Regulations.gov.
Agencies review all submissions and may choose to redact, or withhold,
certain submissions (or portions thereof). Submitted comments may not be
available to be read until the agency has approved them.
Docket Title
Document ID
Comments
Environmental Defense Fund, Maricel Maffini, Breast Cancer Prevention Partners, Clean Water Action/Clean Water Fund, Consumer Reports, Endocrine Society, Environmental Working Group, Healthy Babies Bright Futures, and the Nicholas School of the Environment at Duke University; Filing of Food Additive Petition
FederalRegister.gov retrieves relevant information about this document
from Regulations.gov to provide users with additional context. This
information is not part of the official Federal Register document.
Environmental Defense Fund, Maricel Maffini, Breast Cancer Prevention Partners, Clean Water Action/Clean Water Fund, Consumer Reports, Endocrine Society, Environmental Working Group, Healthy Babies Bright Futures, and the Nicholas School of the Environment at Duke University; Filing of Food Additive Petition
Document page views are updated periodically throughout the day and are
cumulative counts for this document. Counts are subject to sampling,
reprocessing and revision (up or down) throughout the day.
Page views
1,527
as of
10/13/2026 at 8:15 pm EDT
Other Formats
Enhanced Content - Other Formats
This document is also available in the following formats:
This PDF is FR Doc. 2022-14682 as it appeared on Public Inspection on
07/08/2022 at 8:45 am.
It was viewed
29
times while on Public Inspection.
If you are using public inspection listings for legal research, you
should verify the contents of the documents against a final, official
edition of the Federal Register. Only official editions of the
Federal Register provide legal notice of publication to the public and judicial notice
to the courts under 44 U.S.C. 1503 & 1507.
Learn more here.
Published Document: 2022-14682 (87 FR 41079)
This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION:
Notification of petition.
SUMMARY:
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or we) is announcing that we have filed a petition, submitted by Environmental Defense Fund, Maricel Maffini, Breast Cancer Prevention Partners, Clean Water Action/Clean Water Fund, Consumer Reports, Endocrine Society, Environmental Working Group, Healthy Babies Bright Futures, Linda Birnbaum, and the Nicholas School of the Environment at Duke University, proposing that the food additive regulations be amended to remove or restrict authorizations for the use of bisphenol A (BPA).
DATES:
The food additive petition was filed on May 2, 2022. Submit either electronic or written comments on the filing notice by September 9, 2022.
ADDRESSES:
You may submit comments as follows. Please note that late, untimely filed comments will not be considered. The
https://www.regulations.gov
electronic filing system will accept comments until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time at the end of September 9, 2022. Comments received by mail/hand delivery/courier (for written/paper submissions) will be considered timely if they are postmarked or the delivery service acceptance receipt is on or before that date.
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the following way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal:https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted electronically, including attachments, to
https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment does not include any confidential information that you or a third party may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone else's Social Security number, or confidential business information, such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in the body of your comments, that information will be posted on
https://www.regulations.gov.
If you want to submit a comment with confidential information that you do not wish to be made available to the public, submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner detailed (see “Written/Paper Submissions” and “Instructions”).
For written/paper comments submitted to the Dockets Management Staff, FDA will post your comment, as well as any attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified, as confidential, if submitted as detailed in “Instructions.”
Instructions:
All submissions received must include the Docket No. FDA-2022-F-1108 for “Environmental Defense Fund, Maricel Maffini, Breast Cancer Prevention Partners, Clean Water Action/Clean Water Fund, Consumer Reports, Endocrine Society, Environmental Working Group, Healthy Babies Bright Futures, Linda Birnbaum, and the Nicholas School of the Environment at Duke University; Filing of Food Additive Petition.” Received comments, those filed in a timely manner (see
DATES
), will be placed in the docket and, except for those submitted as “Confidential Submissions,” publicly viewable at
https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Dockets Management Staff between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, 240-402-7500.
Confidential Submissions—To submit a comment with confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states “THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.” We will review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in our consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be available for public viewing and posted onhttps://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Dockets Management Staff. If you do not wish your name and contact information to be made publicly available, you can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body of your comments and you must identify this information as “confidential.” Any information marked as “confidential” will not be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or access the information at:
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
Docket:
For access to the docket to read background documents or the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to
https://www.regulations.gov
and insert the docket number, found in brackets in the heading of this document, into the “Search” box and follow the prompts and/or go to the Dockets Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852, 240-402-7500.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marissa Santos, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Food and Drug Administration, 5001 Campus Dr., College Park, MD 20740, 240-402-8160.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Under section 409(b)(5) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 348(b)(5)), we are giving notice that we have filed a food additive petition (FAP 2B4831), submitted by Environmental Defense Fund, Maricel Maffini, Breast Cancer Prevention Partners, Clean Water Action/Clean Water Fund, Consumer Reports, Endocrine Society, Environmental Working Group, Healthy Babies Bright Futures, Linda Birnbaum, and the Nicholas School of the Environment at Duke University, c/o Mr. Thomas Neltner, 1875 Connecticut Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20009. The petition proposes to amend the food additive regulations in §§ 175.105, 175.300, 177.1440, 177.1580, 177.1585, 177.2280, and 177.2440 (21 CFR 175.105, 175.300, 177.1440, 177.1580, 177.1585, 177.2280, and 177.2440); Indirect Food Additives: General (part 174 (21 CFR part 174)); Indirect Food Additives: Adhesives and Components of Coatings (21 CFR part 175); and
( printed page 41080)
Indirect Food Additives: Polymers (21 CFR part 177), to remove authorizations for the use of BPA in §§ 175.105, 175.300, and 177.2440; establish a migration limit for BPA from the authorized uses of BPA in food contact articles in §§ 177.1440, 177.1580, 177.1585, and 177.2280; and add a new provision to part 174 with a restriction on the use of BPA, stating that the substance is subject to a specific migration limit of 0.5 nanograms per kilogram of food. The petition is available in Docket No. FDA-2022-F-1108.
II. Amendment of §§ 175.105, 175.300, 177.1440, 177.1580, 177.1585, 177.2280, and 177.2440 and Addition of New Provision With BPA Restriction
In accordance with the procedures for amending or repealing a food additive regulation in § 171.130 (21 CFR 171.130), the petition asks us to amend §§ 175.105, 175.300, 177.1440, 177.1580, 177.1585, 177.2280, and 177.2440 to remove authorizations for the use of BPA in §§ 175.105, 175.300, and 177.2440; establish a migration limit for BPA from the authorized uses of BPA in food contact articles in §§ 177.1440, 177.1580, 177.1585, and 177.2280; and add a new provision to part 174 with a restriction on the use of BPA. The petitioners cite, as evidence, a draft opinion by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), which analyzed studies related to the health effects of dietary BPA exposure that were published between January 1, 2013, through October 15, 2018. EFSA's draft opinion entitled “Re-evaluation of the risks to public health related to the presence of bisphenol (BPA) in foodstuffs,” was published in December 2021 for public comment. Based on the analysis in the draft EFSA opinion, the petitioners conclude that the use of BPA in food and food contact articles is toxic and disrupts the “proper functioning of the immune and reproductive systems.” To support their conclusion, the petitioners also cite publications referred to in comments to EFSA on the draft opinion and an epidemiology study that petitioners assert show an association of in utero exposure to BPA with an increased risk of asthma and wheezing in school-age girls.
We invite comments, additional scientific data, and other information related to the issues raised by this petition. If we determine that the available data justify removing authorizations for the use of BPA as listed under §§ 175.105, 175.300, and 177.2440; establishing a migration limit for BPA from authorized uses of BPA in food contact articles as listed under §§ 177.1440, 177.1580, 177.1585, and 177.2280; or adding a new provision with a restriction on the use of BPA, we will publish our decision in the
Federal Register
in accordance with § 171.130.
The petitioners have claimed that this action is categorically excluded under 21 CFR 25.32(m) because this action would prohibit or otherwise restrict the use of a substance in food packaging. In addition, the petitioners have stated that, to their knowledge, no extraordinary circumstances exist. If FDA determines a categorical exclusion applies, neither an environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required. If FDA determines a categorical exclusion does not apply, we will request an environmental assessment and make it available for public inspection.
7 comments have been received at Regulations.gov.
Agencies review all submissions and may choose to redact, or withhold, certain submissions (or portions thereof). Submitted comments may not be available to be read until the agency has approved them.