This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily
Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal
Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official
electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal
Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the
corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the
daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial
informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal
Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.
For complete information about, and access to, our official publications
and services, go to
About the Federal Register
on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable
regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of
establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned
publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that
the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with
the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for
legal research should verify their results against an official edition of
the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML
rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not
provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
Rule
Enter a search term or FR citation e.g.
88 FR 38230 FR 78782024-13208USDA09/05/24RULE0503-AA39SORN
Choosing an item from
full text search results
will bring you to those results. Pressing enter in the search box
will also bring you to search results.
Choosing an item from
suggestions
will bring you directly to the content.
This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the
headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents.
This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links
has no substantive legal effect.
Comments are no longer being accepted.
See DATES for details.
Regulations.gov Data
Enhanced Content - Regulations.gov Data
FederalRegister.gov retrieves relevant information about this document
from Regulations.gov to provide users with additional context. This
information is not part of the official Federal Register document.
Schedules of Controlled Substances: Placement of Amineptine in Schedule I
Document page views are updated periodically throughout the day and are
cumulative counts for this document. Counts are subject to sampling,
reprocessing and revision (up or down) throughout the day.
Page views
923
as of
12/03/2024 at 12:15 pm EST
Other Formats
Enhanced Content - Other Formats
This document is also available in the following formats:
This PDF is the current
document as it appeared on Public Inspection on
11/16/2022 at 8:45 am.
It was viewed
16
times while on Public Inspection.
If you are using public inspection listings for legal research, you
should verify the contents of the documents against a final, official
edition of the Federal Register. Only official editions of the
Federal Register provide legal notice of publication to the public and judicial notice
to the courts under 44 U.S.C. 1503 & 1507.
Learn more here.
Published Document: 2022-25003 (87 FR 68895)
This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.
AGENCY:
Drug Enforcement Administration, Department of Justice.
ACTION:
Final rule.
SUMMARY:
With the issuance of this final rule, the Drug Enforcement Administration places amineptine (chemical name: 7-[(10,11-dihydro-5
H
-dibenzo[
a,d]cyclohepten-5-yl)amino]heptanoic acid), including its salts, isomers, and salts of isomers, in schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act. This action is being taken to enable the United States to meet its obligations under the 1971 Convention on Psychotropic Substances. This action imposes the regulatory controls and administrative, civil, and criminal sanctions applicable to schedule I controlled substances on persons who handle (manufacture, distribute, import, export, engage in research, conduct instructional activities or chemical analysis, or possess), or propose to handle amineptine.
DATES:
Effective date: December 19, 2022.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Terrence L. Boos, Drug and Chemical Evaluation Section, Diversion Control Division, Drug Enforcement Administration; Telephone: (571) 362-3249.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Legal Authority
The United States is a party to the 1971 United Nations Convention on Psychotropic Substances (1971 Convention), February 21, 1971, 32 U.S.T. 543, 1019 U.N.T.S. 175, as amended. Procedures respecting changes in drug schedules under the 1971 Convention are governed domestically by 21 U.S.C. 811(d)(2)-(4). When the United States receives notification of a scheduling decision pursuant to Article 2 of the 1971 Convention adding a drug or other substance to a specific schedule, the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS),[1]
after consultation with the Attorney General, shall first determine whether existing legal controls under subchapter I of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) and the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act meet the requirements of the schedule specified in the notification with respect to the specific drug or substance.[2]
In the event that the Secretary of HHS (Secretary) did not so consult with the Attorney General, and the Attorney General did not issue a temporary order, as provided under 21 U.S.C. 811(d)(4), the procedures for permanent scheduling are set forth in 21 U.S.C. 811(a) and (b). Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 811(a)(1), the Attorney General may, by rule, add to such a schedule or transfer between such schedules any drug or other substance, if he finds that such drug or other substance has a potential for abuse, and makes with respect to such drug or other substance the findings prescribed by 21 U.S.C. 812(b) for the schedule in which such drug or other substance is to be placed. The Attorney General has delegated this scheduling authority to the Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration (Administrator).[3]
Background
Amineptine (chemical name: 7-[(10,11-dihydro-5
H
-dibenzo[
a,d]cyclohepten-5-yl)amino]heptanoic acid) is a synthetic tricyclic antidepressant with central nervous system (CNS) stimulating properties.
In April 2003, the United Nations Commission on Narcotic Drugs (CND), on the advice of the Director-General of the World Health Organization (WHO), added amineptine to Schedule II of the 1971 Convention, thus notifying all parties to the 1971 Convention.
DEA and HHS Eight Factor Analyses
On November 8, 2011, in accordance with 21 U.S.C. 811(b), and in response to the Drug Enforcement Administration's (DEA) August 12, 2008 request, HHS provided to DEA a scientific and medical evaluation and a scheduling recommendation for amineptine. DEA subsequently reviewed HHS' evaluation and recommendation for schedule I placement and all other relevant data, and conducted its own analysis under the eight factors stipulated in 21 U.S.C.
( print page 68896)
811(c). DEA found, under 21 U.S.C. 812(b)(1), that this substance warrants control in schedule I. Both DEA and HHS analyses are available in their entirety under “Supporting and Related Material” of the public docket for this rule at
https://www.regulations.gov
under docket number DEA-371.
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to Schedule Amineptine
On July 22, 2021, DEA published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) entitled “Schedules of Controlled Substances: Placement of amineptine in schedule I.” [4]
The NPRM provided an opportunity for interested persons to file a request for a hearing in accordance with DEA regulations on or before August 23, 2021. No requests for such a hearing were received by DEA. The NPRM also provided an opportunity for interested persons to submit comments on the proposed rule on or before September 20, 2021.
Comments Received
DEA received three comments on the proposed rule to control amineptine in schedule I of the CSA.
Support for rulemaking:
Two commenters recognized the dangers and public health risks, and supported the placement of amineptine in schedule I.
DEA Response:
DEA appreciates the comments in support of this rulemaking.
Opposition to rulemaking:
One commenter opposed the placement of amineptine in schedule I due to the lack of abuse in the United States, and contended it showed potential as an “anti-addictive agent and antidepressant” in clinical settings.
DEA Response:
DEA does not agree. As discussed in DEA and HHS eight-factor analyses which accompanied the published NPRM, amineptine is not approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use in the United States. While amineptine has previously been used in Europe and Asia as an antidepressant, its use has been withdrawn from the market in 49 of 66 countries. Strong evidence of abuse, severe adverse effects including hepatotoxicity, pancreatic injury, and severe acne eruption that required hospitalization, and overconsumption, have been documented by the WHO's Expert Committee on Drug Dependence report [5]
and HHS in their scientific and medical evaluation where amineptine was recommended for control in schedule I of the CSA.[6]
In addition, DEA conducted an eight-factor analysis pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 811(c), and based its scheduling determination on a comprehensive evaluation of all available data. As stated in the proposed rulemaking, after careful review of all data, DEA concurred with HHS' assessment that amineptine has a high potential for abuse, and it has no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States and lacks accepted safety for use under medical supervision. Congress established only one schedule, schedule I, for drugs of abuse with “no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States” and “lack of accepted safety for use under medical supervision.” [7]
DEA is therefore promulgating this final rule placing amineptine in schedule I under the CSA.
Scheduling Conclusion
After consideration of the public comments, the scientific and medical evaluation and accompanying recommendation of HHS, and conducting an independent eight-factor analysis, DEA finds substantial evidence of potential for abuse of amineptine. As such, DEA is permanently scheduling amineptine as a controlled substance under the CSA.
Determination of Appropriate Schedule
The CSA establishes five schedules of controlled substances known as schedules I, II, III, IV, and V. The CSA also outlines the findings required to place a drug or other substance in any particular schedule.[8]
After consideration of the analysis and recommendation of the Assistant Secretary for HHS and review of all other available data, the Administrator, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 811(a) and 812(b)(1), finds that:
(1) Amineptine has a high potential for abuse. This potential is comparable to certain schedule II substances (
e.g.,
amphetamine or cocaine);
(2) Amineptine has no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States; [9]
and
(3) There is a lack of accepted safety for use of amineptine under medical supervision.
Based on these findings, the Administrator concludes that amineptine, including its salts, isomers, and salts of isomers, warrants control in schedule I of the CSA.[10]
Requirements for Handling Amineptine
Amineptine is subject to the CSA's schedule I regulatory controls and administrative, civil, and criminal sanctions applicable to the manufacture, distribution, dispensing, importing, exporting, research, and conduct of instructional activities, including the following:
1.
Registration.
Any person who handles (manufactures, distributes, imports, exports, engages in research, or conducts instructional activities or chemical analysis with, or possesses) amineptine, or who desires to handle amineptine, must be registered with DEA to conduct such activities pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 822, 823, 957, and 958, and in accordance with 21 CFR parts 1301 and 1312. Any person who currently handles amineptine and is not registered with DEA must submit an application for registration and may not continue to handle amineptine, unless DEA has approved that application, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 822, 823, 957, and 958 and in accordance with 21 CFR parts 1301 and 1312.
2.
Disposal of stocks.
Any person unwilling or unable to obtain a schedule I registration must surrender all quantities of currently held amineptine, or may transfer all quantities of currently held amineptine to a person registered with DEA. Amineptine is required to be disposed of in accordance with 21 CFR part 1317, in addition to all other applicable Federal, State, local, and tribal laws.
3.
Security.
Amineptine is subject to schedule I security requirements and
( print page 68897)
must be handled and stored pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 821 and 823 and in accordance with 21 CFR parts 1301.71-1301.76. Non-practitioners handling amineptine must also comply with the employee screening requirements of 21 CFR parts 1301.90-1301.93.
4.
Labeling and Packaging.
All labels, labeling, and packaging for commercial containers of amineptine must comply with 21 U.S.C. 825 and 958(e), and be in accordance with 21 CFR part 1302.
5.
Quota.
Only registered manufacturers are permitted to manufacture amineptine in accordance with a quota assigned pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 826 and in accordance with 21 CFR part 1303.
6.
Inventory.
Every DEA registrant who possesses any quantity of amineptine must take an inventory of amineptine on hand pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 827 and 958 and in accordance with 21 CFR parts 1304.03, 1304.04, and 1304.11(a) and (d).
Any person who registers with DEA must take an initial inventory of all stocks of controlled substances (including amineptine) on hand on the date the registrant first engages in the handling of controlled substances, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 827, 958, and in accordance with 21 CFR 1304.03, 1304.04, and 1304.11(a) and (b).
After the initial inventory, every DEA registrant must take an inventory of all controlled substances (including amineptine) on hand every two years, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 827 and 958, and in accordance with 21 CFR parts 1304.03, 1304.04, and 1304.11.
7.
Records and Reports.
Every DEA registrant must maintain records and submit reports with respect to amineptine, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 827 and 958(e), and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.74(b) and (c) and parts 1304, 1312, and 1317. Manufacturers and distributors must submit reports regarding amineptine to the Automation of Reports and Consolidated Order System pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 827 and in accordance with 21 CFR parts 1304 and 1312.
8.
Order Forms.
Every DEA registrant who distributes amineptine must comply with the order form requirements, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 828 and in accordance with 21 CFR part 1305.
9.
Importation and Exportation.
All importation and exportation of amineptine must comply with 21 U.S.C. 952, 953, 957, and 958, and in accordance with 21 CFR part 1312.
10.
Liability.
Any activity involving amineptine not authorized by, or in violation of, the CSA or its implementing regulations, is unlawful, and may subject the person to administrative, civil, and/or criminal sanctions.
Regulatory Analyses
Executive Orders 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) and 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review)
In accordance with 21 U.S.C. 811(a), this final scheduling action is subject to formal rulemaking procedures performed “on the record after opportunity for a hearing,” which are conducted pursuant to the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 556 and 557. The CSA sets forth the criteria for scheduling a drug or other substance. Such actions are exempt from review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) pursuant to section 3(d)(1) of Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 and the principles reaffirmed in E.O. 13563.
This regulation meets the applicable standards set forth in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of E.O. 12988 to eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity, minimize litigation, provide a clear legal standard for affected conduct, and promote simplification and burden reduction.
This rulemaking does not have federalism implications warranting the application of E.O. 13132. The rule does not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the National Government and the States, or the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
This rule does not have tribal implications warranting the application of E.O. 13175. It does not have substantial direct effects on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Administrator, in accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, has reviewed this final rule and by approving it certifies that it will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
DEA is placing the substance amineptine, including its salts, isomers, and salts of isomers, in schedule I of the CSA. This action is being taken to enable the United States to meet its obligations under the 1971 Convention. This action imposes the regulatory controls and administrative, civil, and criminal sanctions applicable to schedule I controlled substances on persons who handle (manufacture, distribute, reverse distribute, import, export, engage in research, conduct instructional activities or chemical analysis with, or possess), or propose to handle amineptine.
Based on the review of HHS' scientific and medical evaluation and all other relevant data, DEA determined that amineptine has a high potential for abuse, has no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States, and lacks accepted safety for use under medical supervision. DEA's research confirms that there is no legitimate commercial market for amineptine in the United States. DEA is not aware of any availability or source of amineptine in the United States. Therefore, DEA estimates that no United States entity currently handles amineptine and does not expect any United States entity to handle amineptine in the foreseeable future. DEA concludes that no legitimate United States entity would be affected by this rule. As such, this rule will not have a significant effect on a substantial number of small entities.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
In accordance with the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) of 1995, 2 U.S.C. 1501et seq.,
DEA has determined and certifies that this action would not result in any Federal mandate that may result “in the expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100,000,000 or more (adjusted annually for inflation) in any 1 year * * *.” Therefore, neither a Small Government Agency Plan nor any other action is required under UMRA of 1995.
Congressional Review Act
This rule is not a major rule as defined by the Congressional Review Act (CRA), 5 U.S.C. 804. However, pursuant to the CRA, DEA is submitting a copy of this final rule to the Government Accountability Office, the House, and the Senate under the CRA.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This action does not impose a new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
11
( print page 68898)
This action would not impose recordkeeping or reporting requirements on State or local governments, individuals, businesses, or organizations. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
2. Amend § 1308.11 by re-designating paragraphs (f)(1) through (f)(9) as paragraphs (f)(2) through (f)(10), and adding a new paragraph (f)(1) to read as follows:
(1) Amineptine (7-[(10,11-dihydro-5
H
-dibenzo[
a,d]cyclohepten-5-yl)amino]heptanoic acid)
1219
* * * * *
Signing Authority
This document of the Drug Enforcement Administration was signed on November 9, 2022, by Administrator Anne Milgram. That document with the original signature and date is maintained by DEA. For administrative purposes only, and in compliance with requirements of the Office of the Federal Register, the undersigned DEA Federal Register Liaison Officer has been authorized to sign and submit the document in electronic format for publication, as an official document of DEA. This administrative process in no way alters the legal effect of this document upon publication in the
Federal Register
.
Heather Achbach,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, Drug Enforcement Administration.
Footnotes
1.
As discussed in a memorandum of understanding entered into by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), FDA acts as the lead agency within HHS in carrying out the Secretary's scheduling responsibilities under the CSA, with the concurrence of NIDA. 50 FR 9518 (March 8, 1985). The Secretary of HHS has delegated to the Assistant Secretary for Health of HHS the authority to make domestic drug scheduling recommendations. 58 FR 35460 (July 1, 1993).
5.
World Health Organization (WHO) Critical Review of Psychoactive Substances prepared for evaluation by the 33rd Meeting of the WHO Expert Committee on Drug Dependence. Annex, 2002.1-14.
6.
While HHS's Secretary is the expert on scientific and medical matters in scheduling decisions of this type, DEA is not bound by HHS's recommendation to schedule a substance. DEA's Administrator is obligated to determine “that these facts and all other relevant data constitute substantial evidence of potential for abuse such as to warrant control” prior to following set rulemaking proceedings for control. 21 U.S.C. 811(b);
see76 FR 77330, 77334-77335, Dec. 12, 2011. This is what DEA is doing in this rulemaking.
9.
Although there is no evidence suggesting that amineptine has a currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States, it bears noting that a drug cannot be found to have such medical use unless DEA concludes that it satisfies a five-part test. Specifically, with respect to a drug that has not been approved by FDA, to have a currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States, all of the following must be demonstrated: i. the drug's chemistry must be known and reproducible; ii. there must be adequate safety studies; iii. there must be adequate and well-controlled studies proving efficacy; iv. the drug must be accepted by qualified experts; and v. the scientific evidence must be widely available. 57 FR 10499 (1992),
pet. for rev. denied, Alliance for Cannabis Therapeutics
v.
DEA,
15 F.3d 1131, 1135 (D.C. Cir. 1994).