This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily
Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal
Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official
electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal
Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the
corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the
daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial
informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal
Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.
For complete information about, and access to, our official publications
and services, go to
About the Federal Register
on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable
regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of
establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned
publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that
the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with
the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for
legal research should verify their results against an official edition of
the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML
rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not
provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
Rule
Enter a search term or FR citation e.g.
88 FR 38230 FR 78782024-13208USDA09/05/24RULE0503-AA39SORN
Choosing an item from
full text search results
will bring you to those results. Pressing enter in the search box
will also bring you to search results.
Choosing an item from
suggestions
will bring you directly to the content.
This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the
headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents.
This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links
has no substantive legal effect.
Comments are no longer being accepted.
See DATES for details.
Regulations.gov Data
Enhanced Content - Regulations.gov Data
FederalRegister.gov retrieves relevant information about this document
from Regulations.gov to provide users with additional context. This
information is not part of the official Federal Register document.
Document page views are updated periodically throughout the day and are
cumulative counts for this document. Counts are subject to sampling,
reprocessing and revision (up or down) throughout the day.
Page views
769
as of
10/12/2026 at 10:15 pm EDT
Other Formats
Enhanced Content - Other Formats
This document is also available in the following formats:
This PDF is FR Doc. 2023-11138 as it appeared on Public Inspection on
05/24/2023 at 8:45 am.
It was viewed
24
times while on Public Inspection.
If you are using public inspection listings for legal research, you
should verify the contents of the documents against a final, official
edition of the Federal Register. Only official editions of the
Federal Register provide legal notice of publication to the public and judicial notice
to the courts under 44 U.S.C. 1503 & 1507.
Learn more here.
Published Document: 2023-11138 (88 FR 33831)
This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.
AGENCY:
Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense (DoD).
( printed page 33832)
ACTION:
Final rule.
SUMMARY:
DoD is issuing a final rule amending the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to provide payment instructions for certain contracts based on the type of item acquired and the type of payment.
DATES:
Effective May 25, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. David E. Johnson, telephone 202-913-5764.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
DoD published a proposed rule in the
Federal Register
at 87 FR 77053 on December 16, 2022, to amend the DFARS to provide payment instructions for certain contracts based on the type of item acquired and the type of payment. Two respondents submitted comments in response to the proposed rule.
II. Discussion and Analysis
DoD reviewed the public comments in the development of the final rule. A discussion of the comments and the changes made to the rule as a result of those comments is provided, as follows:
A. Summary of Significant Changes From the Proposed Rule
Language in the clause at DFARS 252.232-7002, Progress Payments for Foreign Military Sales Acquisitions, is changed for clarity. The term “subcontractor progress payments” is changed to “subcontract financing” in the clauses at DFARS 252.232-7002, paragraph (d), and 252.232-7018, Progress Payments—Multiple Lots, paragraph (b)(4).
B. Analysis of Public Comments
1. Data Underlying the Proposed Rule
Comment:
One respondent inquired about the set of data that underlies the proposed rule and whether such data adequately supports the proposed rule.
Response:
Such data has not been published for public comment, but it was gathered in the normal course of compiling operational statistics relating to the manual entry of payment instructions in DoD payment systems. This rule standardizes payment instructions and therefore eliminates the need for such manual entry. This in turn eliminates the possibility of both data-entry errors and application of incorrect payment instructions.
2. Possible Ambiguity in Instructions for Progress Payment Requests
Comment:
One respondent inquired whether paragraph (a) of the clause at DFARS 252.232-7002, Progress Payments for Foreign Military Sales Acquisitions, requires separate submission of foreign military sales (FMS) progress payment requests combined with U.S. sales progress payment requests, or rather that the clause requires submission of FMS progress payment requests separate from U.S. ones.
Response:
The intent is for FMS progress payment requests to be submitted separately from U.S. sales progress payment requests. The language in the clause at DFARS 252.232-7002 has been clarified in the final rule.
3. Prescription for the Clause at DFARS 252.232-70XX
Comment:
One respondent inquired whether the prescription for the clause at DFARS 252.232-70XX, Progress Payments—Multiple Lots, should explicitly limit application of the clause to fixed price contracts.
Response:
In accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation 32.500(a), only fixed-price contracts may provide for progress payments. The prescription limits application of the clause at DFARS 252.232-7018 to contracts that provide for progress payments. DoD therefore declines the suggested change as unnecessary.
4. References to “Subcontractor Progress Payments”
Comment:
One respondent recommends changing the term “subcontractor progress payments” to “subcontract financing” in the clauses at DFARS 252.232-7002(d) and 252.232-70XX(b)(4) to better align with relevant language in the Federal Acquisition Regulation.
Response:
In the final rule, the term “subcontractor progress payments” is changed to “subcontract financing” in the clauses at DFARS 252.232-7002, paragraph (d), and 252.232-7018, paragraph (b)(4).
III. Applicability to Contracts at or Below the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (SAT) and for Commercial Services, and for Commercial Products, Including Commercially Available Off-the-Shelf (COTS) Items
This rule clarifies payment instructions for certain contracts based on the type of item acquired and the type of payment by amending DFARS 252.204-7006, Billing Instructions—Cost Vouchers, and 252.232-7002, Progress Payments for Foreign Military Sales Acquisitions. Application of these clauses to contracts at or below the SAT and to commercial services, commercial products, and COTS items is unchanged. This final rule adds a new clause at 252.232-7018, Progress Payments—Multiple Lots. DoD will apply this clause to solicitations and contracts at or below the SAT and will not apply the clause to commercial services or commercial products, including COTS items.
IV. Expected Impact of the Rule
Currently, payment instructions are being entered manually into DoD's payment systems due to a lack of clarity in the DFARS regarding payment instructions. This rule clarifies the payment instruction language in the DFARS. The clarifications in this rule will reduce data errors and inoperability problems throughout DoD's business processes created by manual entry of payment instructions in the payment systems, as well as reducing the cost of data entry.
V. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not subject to review under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, dated September 30, 1993.
VI. Congressional Review Act
As required by the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801-808) before an interim or final rule takes effect, DoD will submit a copy of the interim or final rule with the form, Submission of Federal Rules under the Congressional Review Act, to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States. A major rule under the Congressional Review Act cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register
. The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs has determined that this rule is not a major rule as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804.
VII. Regulatory Flexibility Act
A final regulatory flexibility analysis (FRFA) has been prepared consistent with the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601,
et seq.
The FRFA is summarized as follows:
( printed page 33833)
The purpose of this rule is to provide clarifications on payment instructions for certain contracts based on the type of item acquired and the type of payment. DoD has found that the payment instructions often are not inserted when required and that payment instructions, if inserted, are often not appropriate for the contracts in question. An analysis of the issue showed that the appropriate accounting treatment for payments can be derived from the type of item acquired and the type of payment. In addition, the analysis highlighted the need to establish procedures for structuring progress payment requests for contracts with multiple production lots. The clarifications in this rule will promote consistency with generally accepted accounting principles and reduce data errors created by manual entry of payment instructions in the payment systems.
No public comments were received in response to the initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
The rule will apply to all small entities that will be awarded cost-reimbursement, time-and-material, or labor-hour contracts. However, the rule requires negligible additional effort by contractors, including small entities, because it simply clarifies the identification and use of payment information elements in payment requests. According to data from the Federal Procurement Data System for fiscal years 2020 through 2022, approximately 6,800 cost-reimbursement, time-and-material, and labor-hour contracts (0.01% percent of all awards) are awarded to approximately 1,100 small businesses (3 percent of all awardees) each year. This rule also applies to contracts that use multiple accounting classifications or that involve progress payments for multiple production lots. DoD cannot accurately quantify the number of contracts subject to the multiple-lot progress payments clause, but such contracts are likely few in number.
The rule does not contain any new reporting, recordkeeping, or other compliance requirements for small entities.
There are no known, significant, alternative approaches to the rule that would meet the objectives of the rule.
VIII. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35) applies to this rule regarding new DFARS clause 252.232-7018, Progress Payments—Multiple Lots. However, these changes to the DFARS do not impose additional information collection requirements to the paperwork burden previously approved under Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Control Number 9000-0010, titled Progress Payments, SF 1443. The rule affects information collection requirements in DFARS 252.232-7002, Progress Payments for Foreign Military Sales Acquisitions, currently approved under OMB Control Number 0704-0321, titled “DFARS Part 232, Contract Financing, and the Clause at 252.232-7002, Progress Payments for Foreign Military Sales Acquisition.” The impact, however, is negligible because the changed reporting requirement is not anticipated to increase the estimate of total burden hours; rather the requirement to submit separate payment requests by rate is merely replaced by a requirement to submit separate payment requests for FMS and U.S. line items in the contract.
(b) Use the clause at 252.204-7006, Billing Instructions—Cost Vouchers, in solicitations and contracts when a cost-reimbursement contract, a time-and-materials contract, or a labor-hour contract is contemplated.
PART 232—CONTRACT FINANCING
3. Amend section 232.502-4-70 by adding paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Progress Payments for Foreign Military Sales Acquisitions.
As prescribed in 232.502-4-70(a), use the following clause:
Progress Payments for Foreign Military Sales Acquisitions (May 2023)
If this contract includes foreign military sales (FMS) requirements, the Contractor shall—
(a) Submit separate progress payment requests for the FMS and U.S. line items in the contract;
(b) Submit a supporting schedule showing the amount of each request distributed to each country's requirements;
(c) Identify in each progress payment request the contract requirements to which it applies (
i.e.,
FMS or U.S.);
(d) Calculate each request on the basis of the prices, costs (including costs to complete), subcontract financing, and progress payment liquidations of the contract requirements to which it applies; and
(e) Distribute costs among the countries in a manner acceptable to the Administrative Contracting Officer.
As prescribed in 232.502-4-70(c), use the following clause:
Progress Payments—Multiple Lots (May 2023)
(a)
Definitions.
As used in this clause—
Lot
means one or more fixed-price deliverable line items or deliverable subline items representing a single, severable group where the sum of the costs for each group is segregated and a single progress payment rate is used.
Multiple lots
means more than one lot on a single contract where progress payment proration is performed on a lot-wide, versus contract-wide, basis.
(b) When submitting progress payment requests under the billing instructions in Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) clause 52.232-16, Progress Payments, or Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) clause 252.232-7002, Progress
( printed page 33834)
Payments for Foreign Military Sales Acquisitions, of this contract, the Contractor shall—
(1) Submit separate progress payment requests for each lot identified in the contract;
(2) Identify the contract price for the lot as the sum of all fixed-priced line items identified to the lot, in accordance with FAR 32.501-3;
(3) Identify the lot on each progress payment request to which the request applies;
(4) Calculate each request on the basis of the price, costs (including the cost to complete), subcontractor financing, and progress payment liquidations of the lot to which it applies; and
(5) Distribute costs among lots in a manner acceptable to the Administrative Contracting Officer.
(c) Submit a separate progress payment request for U.S. and FMS requirements in accordance with the DFARS clause 252.232-7002, Progress Payments for Foreign Military Sales Acquisitions, of this contract.