This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily
Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal
Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official
electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal
Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the
corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the
daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial
informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal
Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.
For complete information about, and access to, our official publications
and services, go to
About the Federal Register
on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable
regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of
establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned
publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that
the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with
the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for
legal research should verify their results against an official edition of
the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML
rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not
provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
Rule
Enter a search term or FR citation e.g.
88 FR 38230 FR 78782024-13208USDA09/05/24RULE0503-AA39SORN
Choosing an item from
full text search results
will bring you to those results. Pressing enter in the search box
will also bring you to search results.
Choosing an item from
suggestions
will bring you directly to the content.
This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the
headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents.
This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links
has no substantive legal effect.
Document page views are updated periodically throughout the day and are
cumulative counts for this document. Counts are subject to sampling,
reprocessing and revision (up or down) throughout the day.
Page views
143
as of
10/11/2026 at 2:15 am EDT
Other Formats
Enhanced Content - Other Formats
This document is also available in the following formats:
This PDF is FR Doc. 2024-22907 as it appeared on Public Inspection on
10/03/2024 at 8:45 am.
It was viewed
0
times while on Public Inspection.
If you are using public inspection listings for legal research, you
should verify the contents of the documents against a final, official
edition of the Federal Register. Only official editions of the
Federal Register provide legal notice of publication to the public and judicial notice
to the courts under 44 U.S.C. 1503 & 1507.
Learn more here.
Published Document: 2024-22907 (89 FR 80743)
This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.
AGENCY:
U.S. Copyright Office, Library of Congress.
ACTION:
Final rule.
SUMMARY:
The U.S. Copyright Office is issuing a final rule adjusting the process and fee to obtain a certified final determination from the Copyright Claims Board.
DATES:
This rule is effective October 4, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rhea Efthimiadis, Assistant to the General Counsel, by email at
meft@copyright.gov
or telephone at 202-707-8350.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Copyright Alternative in Small-Claims Enforcement Act of 2020 (the “CASE Act”) directed the Copyright Office to establish the Copyright Claims Board (the “CCB”), an alternative and voluntary forum for parties seeking to
( printed page 80744)
resolve certain copyright-related disputes that have a total monetary value of $30,000 or less. On May 17, 2022, the Copyright Office published a final rule addressing various topics governing the CCB, including how to obtain a certified official record of a CCB proceeding (the “May 17 Rule”).[1]
The Office needed to promulgate a rule governing such requests due to the CASE Act's requirements for Federal court enforcement of the CCB's final determinations. Under the CASE Act, in situations where the non-prevailing party fails to comply with the final determination issued by the CCB in a proceeding, the prevailing party may “apply to [an appropriate U.S. district court] for an order confirming the relief awarded in the final determination and reducing such award to judgment.” [2]
Any such application to a Federal district court must include a “certified copy of the final or amended final determination of the [CCB], as reflected in the records of the [CCB].” [3]
The May 17 Rule stated that the CCB will certify the official record of a proceeding “[u]pon a written request to the Records Research and Certification Section [(“RRC”)] of the U.S. Copyright Office . . . and payment of the appropriate fee.” [4]
Pursuant to this rule, the Office's general process and fees for the retrieval, copying, and certification of Office records are applied to requests for a certified official record of a final CCB determination. The Office's combined fees for retrieval, copying, and certification, however, are likely to result in an amount that is more than the cost of initiating a proceeding before the CCB.[5]
This final rule creates a different process and fee for retrieving, copying, and certifying CCB determinations. Instead of making such certification requests to RRC, the final rule makes the CCB itself responsible for handling these requests.[6]
Further, to better reflect the statutory requirement that the “final determination” is the required documentation that must be submitted to a Federal district court to confirm the CCB award,[7]
the rule reflects that only the final or amended final determination must be certified and not the entire record. Finally, the Office believes that until it engages in a fee study,[8]
it is reasonable to set the new fee at $15—a fee very similar to what it charges for copying records.[9]
This lower fee is reasonable because, in contrast to the challenges of locating and certifying other Office records, the CCB's records are located on a dedicated electronic filing and case management platform (known as “eCCB”) where they can be quickly retrieved for certification.
The Office is aware that there already may be circumstances where the CCB has issued a final determination, and a non-prevailing party has failed to pay damages (or has failed otherwise to comply with the relief awarded in the Board's final determination) in a timely manner. While prevailing parties could pay the currently applicable fee for records retrieval and certification, consistent with the goals of a small-claims tribunal to be affordable and efficient, it is appropriate to provide such parties immediate relief from paying these higher costs and streamlining the process to make such requests. For these reasons, the Office finds good cause to issue a direct final rule in this proceeding without first engaging in a public notice and comment process.[10]
Similarly, the Office finds that engaging in a notice and comment procedure would effectively unduly delay relief to prevailing parties in CCB proceedings and therefore finds good cause exists to issue these regulations as a final rule with an immediate effective date.[11]
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the U.S. Copyright Office amends chapter II, subchapters A and B, of title 37 Code of Federal Regulations, to read as follows:
Subchapter A—Copyright Office and Procedures
PART 201—GENERAL PROVISIONS
1. The general authority citation for part 201 continues to read as follows:
Fees for registration, recordation, and related services, special services, and services performed by the Licensing Section and the Copyright Claims Board.
* * * * *
(g) * * *
Table 4 to Paragraph (
g
)
Copyright Claims Board fees
Fees
($)
* * * * * * *
(4) Filing fee for the Copyright Claims Board to retrieve, copy, and certify the official final determination or amended final determination of a proceeding (per record item)
15
( printed page 80745)
Subchapter B—Copyright Claims Board and Procedures
PART 229—RECORDS AND PUBLICATION
3. The authority citation for part 229 continues to read as follows:
Upon a party's written request to the Board and payment of the appropriate fee pursuant to 37 CFR 201.3, the Board will provide a certified copy of a proceeding's final or amended final determination. A party who wishes to engage in this service should contact the Board for further instructions on how to make this request.
Dated: September 26, 2024.
Shira Perlmutter,
Register of Copyrights and Director of the U.S. Copyright Office.
5.
See 37 CFR 201.3(c)(19) (identifying certification fee as $200 per hour);
id.
at 201.3(c)(22)(ii) (identifying retrieval of digital records fee as $200 per hour, with a half hour minimum);
id.
at 201.3(d)(6) (identifying copying of Office records fee as $12);
see also id.
at 201.3(g)(1) (identifying $100 fee to initiate a Board proceeding).
6.
The Board is comprised of three Copyright Claims Officers, whose duties include “certify[ing] official records of [the Board's] proceedings.” 17 U.S.C. 1502(b)(1), 1503(a)(1)(I).
8.
The Register periodically engages in a statutorily required study of the costs incurred by the Office for providing various services and provides the public notice of any proposed changes in the Office's fees and the opportunity for public comment.
See id.
at 708(b).