This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily
Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal
Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official
electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal
Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the
corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the
daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial
informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal
Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.
For complete information about, and access to, our official publications
and services, go to
About the Federal Register
on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable
regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of
establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned
publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that
the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with
the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for
legal research should verify their results against an official edition of
the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML
rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not
provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
Notice
Enter a search term or FR citation e.g.
88 FR 38230 FR 78782024-13208USDA09/05/24RULE0503-AA39SORN
Choosing an item from
full text search results
will bring you to those results. Pressing enter in the search box
will also bring you to search results.
Choosing an item from
suggestions
will bring you directly to the content.
This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the
headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents.
This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links
has no substantive legal effect.
Document page views are updated periodically throughout the day and are
cumulative counts for this document. Counts are subject to sampling,
reprocessing and revision (up or down) throughout the day.
Page views
180
as of
09/06/2026 at 4:15 am EDT
Other Formats
Enhanced Content - Other Formats
This document is also available in the following formats:
This PDF is FR Doc. 2024-28150 as it appeared on Public Inspection on
11/29/2024 at 8:45 am.
It was viewed
0
times while on Public Inspection.
If you are using public inspection listings for legal research, you
should verify the contents of the documents against a final, official
edition of the Federal Register. Only official editions of the
Federal Register provide legal notice of publication to the public and judicial notice
to the courts under 44 U.S.C. 1503 & 1507.
Learn more here.
Published Document: 2024-28150 (89 FR 95180)
This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.
AGENCY:
Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY:
The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that countervailable subsidies were provided to Kumar Industries, India (Kumar), a producer and exporter of glycine from India during the period of review (POR) January 1, 2022, through December 31, 2022.
DATES:
Applicable December 2, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Scarlet Jaldin or Amber Hodak AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4275 or (202) 482-8034, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 5, 2024, Commerce published the
Preliminary Results
of this administrative review.[1]
On July 22, 2024, Commerce tolled certain deadlines in this administrative proceeding by seven days.[2]
On November 12, 2024, Commerce extended the deadline for these final results to November 19, 2024.[3]
On November 18, 2024, Commerce further extended the deadline for these final results by an additional three days, to November 22, 2024.[4]
We received timely filed case and rebuttal briefs from Deer Park Glycine, LLC (the petitioner) and Kumar.[5]
For a complete description of the events that occurred since the
Preliminary Results, see
the Issues and Decision Memorandum.[6]
The merchandise covered by the
Order
is glycine from India. For a complete description of the scope of the
Order, see
the Issues and Decision Memorandum.[8]
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the parties' briefs are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues addressed is attached as an appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at
https://access.trade.gov.
In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at
https://access/trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on the arguments raised and a review of the record and all supporting documentation, we made certain changes to the
Preliminary Results.
For a full description of these revisions,
see
the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
Methodology
Commerce conducted this administrative review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For each of the subsidy programs found to be countervailable, Commerce finds that there is a subsidy,
i.e.,
a financial contribution by an “authority” that gives rise to a benefit to the recipient, and that the subsidy is specific.[9]
For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, including any determination that relied upon the use of adverse facts available pursuant to section 776(a) and (b) of the Act,
see
the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum.
Final Results of Review
Commerce determines that the following countervailable subsidy rate exists for the period January 1, 2022, through December 31, 2022:[10]
Commerce intends to disclose its calculations and analysis performed to
( printed page 95181)
interested parties for these final results within five days of any public announcement or, if there is no public announcement, within five days of the date of publication of the notice of final results in the
Federal Register,
in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to sections 751(a)(1) and (a)(2)(C) of the act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2), Commerce has determined, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, countervailing duties on all appropriate entries for the above-listed companies at the applicable
ad valorem
assessment rates. Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the publication of the final results of this review in the
Federal Register
. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request for statutory injunction has expired (
i.e.,
within 90 days of publication).
Cash Deposit Requirements
In accordance with section 751(a)(1) of the Act, Commerce intends to instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties for each of the companies listed above on shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of the final results of this administrative review. For all non-reviewed firms, we will instruct CBP to continue to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties at the all-others rate or the most recent company-specific rate applicable to the company, as appropriate. These cash deposit instructions, effective upon publication of these final results, shall remain in effect until further notice.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to an administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
Commerce is issuing the final results and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).
Dated: November 22, 2024.
Abdelali Elouaradia,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the
Order
IV. Subsidies Valuation Information
V. Analysis of Programs
VI. Changes Since the
Preliminary Results
VII. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Whether Commerce Should Apply Adverse Facts Available (AFA) to Kumar
5.
See
Petitioner's Letter, “Case Brief of Deer Park Glycine, LLC,” dated August 5, 2024;
see also
Kumar's Letter, “Rebuttal Brief,” dated August 12, 2024.
6.
See
Memorandum, “Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Countervailing Duty Administrative Review of Glycine from India; 2022,” dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
9.
See
sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding financial contribution;
see also
section 771(5)(E) of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity.
10.
As discussed in the
Preliminary Results
and Issues and Decision Memorandum, Commerce has found the following companies to be cross-owned with Kumar Industries, India: Advance Chemical Corporation, Rexisize Rasayan Industries, and Reliance Corporation.