This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily
Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal
Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official
electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal
Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the
corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the
daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial
informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal
Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.
For complete information about, and access to, our official publications
and services, go to
About the Federal Register
on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable
regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of
establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned
publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that
the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with
the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for
legal research should verify their results against an official edition of
the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML
rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not
provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
Rule
Enter a search term or FR citation e.g.
88 FR 38230 FR 78782024-13208USDA09/05/24RULE0503-AA39SORN
Choosing an item from
full text search results
will bring you to those results. Pressing enter in the search box
will also bring you to search results.
Choosing an item from
suggestions
will bring you directly to the content.
This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the
headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents.
This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links
has no substantive legal effect.
Document page views are updated periodically throughout the day and are
cumulative counts for this document. Counts are subject to sampling,
reprocessing and revision (up or down) throughout the day.
Page views
177
as of
08/14/2026 at 12:15 am EDT
Other Formats
Enhanced Content - Other Formats
This document is also available in the following formats:
This PDF is FR Doc. 2025-16990 as it appeared on Public Inspection on
09/04/2025 at 8:45 am.
It was viewed
15
times while on Public Inspection.
If you are using public inspection listings for legal research, you
should verify the contents of the documents against a final, official
edition of the Federal Register. Only official editions of the
Federal Register provide legal notice of publication to the public and judicial notice
to the courts under 44 U.S.C. 1503 & 1507.
Learn more here.
Published Document: 2025-16990 (90 FR 42853)
This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.
AGENCY:
Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION:
Final rule.
SUMMARY:
In this document, the Media Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC or Commission) released an Order that re-codifies
( printed page 42854)
language that was inadvertently eliminated from the Commission's rules relating to information that must be provided by Next Gen TV broadcast stations in “non-expedited” applications for ATSC 3.0 service. This Order does not change any regulatory obligations.
DATES:
Effective September 5, 2025.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Evan Baranoff,
Evan.Baranoff@fcc.gov,
of the Media Bureau, Policy Division, (202) 418-7142.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
This is a summary of the Commission's Order, DA 25-761, adopted and released on Aug. 27, 2025. The full text of this document is available electronically via the FCC's website at
https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-25-761A1.pdf
or via the FCC's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) website at
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs. (Documents will be available electronically in ASCII, Microsoft Word, and/or Adobe Acrobat.) Alternative formats are available for people with disabilities (Braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), by sending an email to
fcc504@fcc.gov
or calling the Commission's Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice), (202) 418-0432 (TTY).
Synopsis
I. Introduction
1. In this
Order,
we re-codify language that was inadvertently eliminated from §§ 73.3801(f)(6)(iii), 73.6029(f)(6)(iii), and 74.782(g)(6)(iii) of the Commission's rules (Rules) relating to information that must be provided in “non-expedited” applications for ATSC 3.0 service. This amendment to the Rules does not change any regulatory obligations.
II. Background
2. In the
Next Gen TV First Report and Order,83 FR 4998 (Feb. 2, 2018), the Commission authorized television broadcasters to use the Next Gen TV transmission standard, also called ATSC 3.0, on a voluntary, market-driven basis. The Commission established a process for considering applications to deploy ATSC 3.0 service, which includes coverage requirements for a Next Gen TV station's ATSC 1.0 simulcast signal. As part of that process, the Commission affords expedited processing and a presumption in favor of grant to applications that provide ATSC 1.0 simulcast service to at least 95 percent of the predicted population within the station's original noise limited service contour (NLSC), while applicants that do not satisfy this threshold must provide a more robust public interest showing with their application and will be considered on a case-by-case basis. The required information that must be contained in applications that do not qualify for expedited processing (
i.e.,
“non-expedited” applications) was set forth in §§ 73.3801(f)(6)(iii), 73.6029(f)(6)(iii), and 74.782(g)(6)(iii) of the Rules.
3. Subsequently, in the
Next Gen TV Third Report and Order,88 FR 45347 (Jul. 17, 2023), the Commission modified its ATSC 3.0 rules to, among other things, permit Next Gen TV stations to license multicast streams aired over an ATSC 1.0 multicast host. The Commission also made updates to the required information for ATSC 3.0 applications in §§ 73.3801(f)(6)(i) and (ii), 73.6029(f)(6)(i) and (ii), and 74.782(g)(6)(i) and (ii) of the Commission's rules in order to facilitate multicast licensing, but it did not make changes to the requirements for non-expedited applicants set forth in §§ 73.3801(f)(6)(iii), 73.6029(f)(6)(iii), and 74.782(g)(6)(iii). However, after
Federal Register
publication of the
Next Gen TV Third Report and Order,
these subsections were removed from the Code of Federal Regulations.
III. Discussion
4. We find that the deletion of §§ 73.3801(f)(6)(iii), 73.6029(f)(6)(iii), and 74.782(g)(6)(iii) of the Commission's rules from the Code of Federal Regulations was inadvertent, and, thus, re-codify this language. The
Next Gen TV First Report and Order
codified these provisions to provide clarity about the information that must be provided by non-expedited applicants for ATSC 3.0 service. The Commission never stated or implied in the
Next Gen TV Third Report and Order
that it intended to rescind these subsections. As noted above, the
Next Gen TV Third Report and Order
specifically referred to these provisions as remaining applicable. Accordingly, we amend the Rules as set out in the Appendix by including the inadvertently deleted subsections that set forth the required information non-expedited applications must include to show that such applications are in the public interest.
5. We find that notice and comment procedures are unnecessary under the “good cause” exception of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) because re-codifying the inadvertently deleted subsections merely restores the provisions setting forth the showing that must be made by non-expedited applicants that the Commission adopted in the
Next Gen TV First Report and Order. The Commission did not state or imply that it intended to change or eliminate §§ 73.3801(f)(6)(iii), 73.6029(f)(6)(iii), and 74.782(g)(6)(iii) in the
Next Gen TV Third Report and Order. Consequently, we find notice and comment procedures are unnecessary for this action.
6. We also conclude that good cause exists to make this change effective immediately upon publication in the
Federal Register
, pursuant to section 553(d)(3) of the Administrative Procedure Act. An expedited effective date is necessary to restore the rule in the Code of Federal Regulations as originally adopted by the Commission, which included codified provisions informing non-expedited applicants of the existing requirements for information that must be included in non-expedited applications and to allow the Bureau to promptly act upon such requests. Failure to make the rule change effective immediately may result in confusion among regulated entities as to the required showing and thereby impact the Bureau's ability to determine if applications are in the public interest, and thereby delay broadcasters' ability to commence ATSC 3.0 operation and provide new, innovative services to the public.
IV. Procedural Matters
7.
Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Because these rule changes are being adopted without notice and comment, the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601et seq.,
does not apply.
8.
Paperwork Reduction Act.
This document does not contain new or modified information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501-3521. In addition, therefore, it does not contain any new or modified information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees, pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4).
9.
Congressional Review Act.
The Bureau has determined, and the Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, concurs that this rule is non-major under the Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 804(2). The Bureau will send a copy of this Order to Congress and the Government Accountability Office pursuant to the Congressional Review Act.
V. Ordering Clauses
10.
It is ordered
that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 4, 5(c)(1), 7, 301, 303 of the
( printed page 42855)
Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 151, 154, 155(c)(1), 157, 301, 303, and 47 CFR 0.61, 0.283, this Order
is adopted
and
will become effective
immediately upon publication in the
Federal Register
.
11.
It is further ordered
that parts 73 and 74 of the Commission's rules
are hereby amended
as set forth in the Appendix, effective immediately upon publication in the
Federal Register
.
12.
It is further ordered
that the Bureau
shall send
a copy of this
Order
in a report to be sent to Congress and the Government Accountability Office pursuant to the Congressional Review Act,
see5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A).
Full power television simulcasting during the ATSC 3.0 (Next Gen TV) transition.
* * * * *
(f) * * *
(6) * * *
(iii) If an application in paragraph (f)(2) of this section includes a request to air an ATSC 1.0 signal on the facilities of a host station and does not meet the 95 percent standard in paragraph (f)(6)(ii) of this section, the application must contain, in addition to the information in paragraphs (f)(6)(i) and (ii) of this section, the following information:
(A) Whether there is another possible host station(s) in the market that would result in less service loss to existing viewers and, if so, why the Next Gen TV broadcaster chose to partner with a host station creating a larger service loss;
(B) What steps, if any, the station plans to take to minimize the impact of the service loss (
e.g.,
providing ATSC 3.0 dongles, set-top boxes, or gateway devices to viewers in the loss area); and
(C) The public interest benefits of the simulcasting arrangement and a showing of why the benefit(s) of granting the application would outweigh the harm(s). These applications will be considered on a case-by-case basis.
* * * * *
3. Section 73.6029 is amended by adding paragraph (f)(6)(iii) to read as follows:
Class A television simulcasting during the ATSC 3.0 (Next Gen TV) transition.
* * * * *
(f) * * *
(6) * * *
(iii) If an application in paragraph (f)(2) of this section includes a request to air an ATSC 1.0 signal on the facilities of a host station and does not meet the 95 percent standard in paragraph (f)(6)(ii) of this section, the application must contain, in addition to the information in paragraphs (f)(6)(i) and (ii) of this section, the following information:
(A) Whether there is another possible host station(s) in the market that would result in less service loss to existing viewers and, if so, why the Next Gen TV broadcaster chose to partner with a host station creating a larger service loss;
(B) What steps, if any, the station plans to take to minimize the impact of the service loss (
e.g.,
providing ATSC 3.0 dongles, set-top boxes, or gateway devices to viewers in the loss area); and
(C) The public interest benefits of the simulcasting arrangement and a showing of why the benefit(s) of granting the application would outweigh the harm(s). These applications will be considered on a case-by-case basis.
* * * * *
PART 74—EXPERIMENTAL RADIO, AUXILIARY, SPECIAL BROADCAST AND OTHER PROGRAM DISTRIBUTIONAL SERVICES
4. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows:
Low power television and TV translator simulcasting during the ATSC 3.0 (Next Gen TV) transition.
* * * * *
(g) * * *
(6) * * *
(iii) If an application in paragraph (g)(2) of this section includes a request to air an ATSC 1.0 signal on the facilities of a host station and does not meet the 95 percent standard in paragraph (g)(6)(ii) of this section, the application must contain, in addition to the information in paragraphs (g)(6)(i) and (ii) of this section, the following information:
(A) Whether there is another possible host station(s) in the market that would result in less service loss to existing viewers and, if so, why the Next Gen TV broadcaster chose to partner with a host station creating a larger service loss;
(B) What steps, if any, the station plans to take to minimize the impact of the service loss (
e.g.,
providing ATSC 3.0 dongles, set-top boxes, or gateway devices to viewers in the loss area); and
(C) The public interest benefits of the simulcasting arrangement and a showing of why the benefit(s) of granting the application would outweigh the harm(s). These applications will be considered on a case-by-case basis.