This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily
Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal
Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official
electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal
Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the
corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the
daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial
informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal
Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.
For complete information about, and access to, our official publications
and services, go to
About the Federal Register
on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable
regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of
establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned
publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that
the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with
the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for
legal research should verify their results against an official edition of
the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML
rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not
provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
Proposed Rule
Enter a search term or FR citation e.g.
88 FR 38230 FR 78782024-13208USDA09/05/24RULE0503-AA39SORN
Choosing an item from
full text search results
will bring you to those results. Pressing enter in the search box
will also bring you to search results.
Choosing an item from
suggestions
will bring you directly to the content.
Air Plan Approval; Pennsylvania; Proposed Revision to Philadelphia Gas Works, Richmond Plant Reasonably Available Control Technology Plan Under the 1997 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards
Written comments must be received on or before March 9, 2026.
Table of Contents
Enhanced Content - Table of Contents
This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the
headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents.
This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links
has no substantive legal effect.
Air Plan Approval; Pennsylvania; Proposed Revision to Philadelphia Gas Works, Richmond Plant Reasonably Available Control Technology Plan Under the 1997 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards
Public Comments
Enhanced Content - Public Comments
Comments are no longer being accepted.
See DATES for details.
1 comment has
been received at Regulations.gov.
Agencies review all submissions and may choose to redact, or withhold,
certain submissions (or portions thereof). Submitted comments may not be
available to be read until the agency has approved them.
Docket Title
Document ID
Comments
Air Plan Approval; Pennsylvania; Proposed Revision to Philadelphia Gas Works, Richmond Plant Reasonably Available Control Technology Plan Under the 1997 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards
FederalRegister.gov retrieves relevant information about this document
from Regulations.gov to provide users with additional context. This
information is not part of the official Federal Register document.
Air Plan Approval; Pennsylvania; Proposed Revision to Philadelphia Gas Works, Richmond Plant Reasonably Available Control Technology Plan Under the 1997 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards
Document page views are updated periodically throughout the day and are
cumulative counts for this document. Counts are subject to sampling,
reprocessing and revision (up or down) throughout the day.
Page views
175
as of
07/21/2026 at 8:15 am EDT
Other Formats
Enhanced Content - Other Formats
This document is also available in the following formats:
This PDF is FR Doc. 2026-02381 as it appeared on Public Inspection on
02/05/2026 at 8:45 am.
It was viewed
13
times while on Public Inspection.
If you are using public inspection listings for legal research, you
should verify the contents of the documents against a final, official
edition of the Federal Register. Only official editions of the
Federal Register provide legal notice of publication to the public and judicial notice
to the courts under 44 U.S.C. 1503 & 1507.
Learn more here.
Published Document: 2026-02381 (91 FR 5398)
This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.
AGENCY:
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION:
Proposed rule.
SUMMARY:
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or “the Agency”) is proposing to approve a State implementation plan (SIP) revision submitted by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. In this rulemaking, the EPA proposes to approve a revision to the reasonably available control technology (RACT) Plan for the Philadelphia Gas Works, Richmond Plant (PGW Richmond), a major source of nitrogen oxides (NOX). The proposed revision would remove a condition from the RACT Plan Approval, previously incorporated into Pennsylvania's SIP on October 7, 2016. The proposed revision results in no change of emission allowances under RACT. This action is being taken under the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES:
Written comments must be received on or before March 9, 2026.
ADDRESSES:
Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R03-OAR-2025-2831 at
www.regulations.gov,
or via email to
talley.david@epa.gov.
For comments submitted at
Regulations.gov,
follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from
Regulations.gov.
For either manner of submission, the EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be confidential business information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (
i.e.,
on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in the
For Further Information Contact
section. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit
www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Katharine Payne, Permits Branch (3AP10), Air & Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1600 John F. Kennedy Boulevard, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. The telephone number is (215) 814-2183. Ms. Katharine Payne can also be reached via electronic mail at
payne.katharine@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
On September 7, 2023, the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) submitted on behalf of the City of Philadelphia, Department of Public Health, Air Management Services (AMS) a proposed revision to the Pennsylvania SIP to satisfy the RACT requirements for the 1997 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for Philadelphia.
I. Background
A. General
Section 172(c)(1) of the CAA provides that SIPs for nonattainment areas must include reasonably available control measures (RACM) for attainment of the NAAQS, including emissions reductions from existing sources through adoption of RACT. Sections 182(b)(2) and (f)(1) of the CAA require States with moderate, or worse, ozone nonattainment areas to implement RACT controls on each category of stationary sources covered by a control technique guideline (CTG) document issued by the EPA and on all major stationary sources of volatile organic compounds (VOC) and NOX
emissions located in the nonattainment area.[1]
On July 18, 1997 (62 FR 38856), the EPA revised the NAAQS for ground-level ozone, setting the standard at 0.08 parts per million (ppm) averaged over an 8-hour time frame. On April 15, 2004, the EPA issued final designations for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS, which included Philadelphia County as part of the Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-MD-DE moderate ozone nonattainment area. See 69 FR 23858, at 23931 (April 30, 2004). The nonattainment designation for Philadelphia under the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS, and its location in the ozone transport region (OTR), triggered Pennsylvania's obligation to submit a SIP revision addressing how it meets the CAA RACT requirements in Philadelphia under this standard.
On March 27, 2008 (73 FR 16436), the EPA significantly strengthened the 8-hour ozone NAAQS by revising the primary 8-hour ozone standard to a level of 0.075 ppm. On March 6, 2015 (80 FR 12264), the EPA published a final rule for the implementation of the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS, while at the same time revoking the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS, effective on April 6, 2015.[2]
The EPA's previous approach, the 2008 8-hour ozone Implementation Rule established anti-backsliding principles to transition from implementing the revoked 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS to the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS, the EPA clarified that RACT under the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS, among other requirements, continues to apply to a nonattainment area, in accordance with its designation and classification for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS at the time of the revocation of the standard. Therefore, 1997 8-hour ozone RACT continues to be an applicable requirement for Philadelphia.
B. EPA's Requirements Under the 1997 8-Hour Ozone RACT
On November 29, 2005 (70 FR 71612), the EPA published the Phase 2 Ozone
( printed page 5399)
Implementation Rule to address nonattainment SIP requirements for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS.[3]
This rule addressed, among other things, control and planning obligations as they apply to nonattainment areas under the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS, including RACT and RACM. The EPA specifically required that States meet the RACT requirements, either through a certification that previously adopted RACT controls in their SIP revisions approved by the EPA under the 1-hour ozone NAAQS continue to represent adequate RACT control levels for 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS attainment purposes, or through the adoption of new or more stringent regulations that represent RACT control levels.[4]
II. Summary of Proposed SIP Revision
On October 7, 2016 (81 FR 69687), the EPA took final action to approve SIP revisions that were submitted by PADEP on behalf of AMS in order to satisfy RACT requirements of the 1997 ozone NAAQS applicable to sources located in Philadelphia. Included in that approval were source-specific requirements applicable to three 295 horsepower Caterpillar engines located at PGW Richmond. Specifically, Condition 1(B)(2) of AMS' July 9, 2015 RACT Plan Approval required that the timing of the engines be set and maintained at four degrees retarded relative to the standard timing.[5]
On September 7, 2023, PADEP submitted to the EPA for approval, a SIP package that contains a revision to Pennsylvania's SIP to amend the source-specific RACT requirements for PGW Richmond by removing condition 1(B)(2). In this submittal, PADEP indicated that Condition 1(B)(2) was mistakenly included in the RACT Plan Approval for PGW Richmond. 25 Pennsylvania Code (Pa. Code) 129.93(c) contains a list of source types that are required to meet RACT through the “. . . installation, maintenance and operation of the source in accordance with manufacturers specifications.” Condition 1(B)(2) appears to have been included in order to constrain the engines in such a way that they would be subject to the presumptive RACT requirements of 25 Pa. Code 129.93(c). However, the engines as installed did not have timing as described in 25 Pa. Code 129.93(c)(3). Modifying the timing to 4 degrees retarded relative to standard timing would damage the engines and would be contrary to the presumptive RACT requirement the condition was intended to meet (
i.e.,
installation in accordance with manufacturers specifications). Furthermore, based on the permitted use of the three Caterpillar Engines 135GU 295 horsepower Units at PGW Richmond, AMS determined that the three emission units meet the criteria of 25 Pa. Code 129.93(c)(5), and are therefore still subject to the presumptive RACT requirement to install, maintain and operate the engines in accordance with manufacturer's specifications.
Removing Condition 1(B)(2) from the PGW Richmond RACT Plan Approval results in no change of emission allowances under RACT because the RACT requirement of 25 Pa. Code section 129.93(c) is the same for source categories listed in 25 Pa. Code section129.93(c)(3) and (c)(5). Updating this source type will remove the source as a case-by-case RACT requirement from the Pennsylvania SIP.
III. Proposed Action
The EPA's review of the materials indicate that Condition 1(B)(2) should be removed from the Philadelphia RACT Plan Approval for PGW Richmond that was previously incorporated into the Pennsylvania SIP. The EPA proposes to approve the Pennsylvania SIP revision, which was submitted on September 7, 2023. The EPA is soliciting public comments on the issues discussed in this document. These comments will be considered before taking final action.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, the EPA proposes to include in a final EPA rule regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to incorporate by reference the revised RACT Plan Approval for PGW Richmond, as described in section II of this document. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these materials generally available through
www.regulations.gov
and at the EPA Region III Office (please contact the person identified in the
For Further Information Contact
section of this preamble for more information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Clean Air Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this action merely approves State law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by State law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act.
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian Tribe has demonstrated that a Tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have Tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on Tribal governments or preempt Tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
1.
A major source in an ozone nonattainment area is defined as any stationary source that emits or has the potential to emit NOX
and VOC emissions above a certain applicability threshold that is based on the classification of the ozone nonattainment area. See “major stationary source” in 40 CFR 51.165.
2.
“Implementation of the 2008 National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone: State Implementation Plan Requirements” Final Rule, (80 FR 12264, March 6, 2015).
4.
For more information, see the preamble of the final Phase 2 Ozone Implementation Rule for a discussion of the EPA's interpretation of the CAA RACT requirements for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS, in 70 FR 71652 through 71659 (November 29, 2005).
1 comment has been received at Regulations.gov.
Agencies review all submissions and may choose to redact, or withhold, certain submissions (or portions thereof). Submitted comments may not be available to be read until the agency has approved them.