This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily
Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal
Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official
electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal
Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the
corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the
daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial
informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal
Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.
For complete information about, and access to, our official publications
and services, go to
About the Federal Register
on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable
regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of
establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned
publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that
the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with
the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for
legal research should verify their results against an official edition of
the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML
rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not
provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
Notice
Enter a search term or FR citation e.g.
88 FR 38230 FR 78782024-13208USDA09/05/24RULE0503-AA39SORN
Choosing an item from
full text search results
will bring you to those results. Pressing enter in the search box
will also bring you to search results.
Choosing an item from
suggestions
will bring you directly to the content.
This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the
headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents.
This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links
has no substantive legal effect.
Document page views are updated periodically throughout the day and are
cumulative counts for this document. Counts are subject to sampling,
reprocessing and revision (up or down) throughout the day.
Page views
204
as of
07/10/2026 at 12:15 pm EDT
Other Formats
Enhanced Content - Other Formats
This document is also available in the following formats:
This PDF is FR Doc. 2026-10111 as it appeared on Public Inspection on
05/19/2026 at 8:45 am.
It was viewed
16
times while on Public Inspection.
If you are using public inspection listings for legal research, you
should verify the contents of the documents against a final, official
edition of the Federal Register. Only official editions of the
Federal Register provide legal notice of publication to the public and judicial notice
to the courts under 44 U.S.C. 1503 & 1507.
Learn more here.
Published Document: 2026-10111 (91 FR 29453)
This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.
( printed page 29453)
AGENCY:
Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY:
The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) is rescinding the administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on certain freight rail couplers and parts thereof (freight rail couplers) from the People's Republic of China (China). The period of review (POR) is July 1, 2024, through June 30, 2025.
DATES:
Applicable May 20, 2026.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joseph Molokwu, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-8043.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 30, 2025, Commerce published in the
Federal Register
a notice of opportunity to request an administrative review of the
Order[1]
on freight rail couplers from China.[2]
Commerce received a timely request for review of the
Order
from the Coalition of Freight Coupler Producers (the petitioner) for certain producers/exporters of subject merchandise.[3]
On August 13, 2025, Commerce requested clarification on certain companies identified by the petitioner as producers and/or exporters of subject merchandise from China.[4]
On August 22, 2025, Commerce published the initiation notice in the
Federal Register
in accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).[5]
On September 3, 2025, Commerce placed on the record U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) entry data for the companies subject to the review, and invited interested parties to comment.[6]
On September 10, 2025, the petitioner submitted comments on the lack of entries in the CBP data, stating that there may be entries of subject merchandise that entered as a product other than an entry for consumption (such as entries of subject merchandise that entered mounted to railcars), the petitioner additionally clarified its request for review of certain companies.[7]
On December 8, 2025, Commerce republished the initiation notice in the
Federal Register
, clarifying the name of one entity and removing certain companies not subject to administrative review.[8]
On February 13, 2026, Commerce responded to the petitioner's CBP entry data comments and notified interested parties of its intent to rescind the 2024-2025 administrative review.[9]
Commerce additionally invited interested parties to comment on the absence of reviewable entries during the POR.[10]
We received comments from the petitioner and U.S. importer, Greenbrier Central LLC (Greenbrier) regarding our notice of intent to rescind.[11]
The petitioner requested Commerce to reconsider its intent to rescind and highlighted the ongoing CBP Enforce and Protect Act (EAPA) investigation into Greenbrier. Greenbrier rebutted and highlighted the absence of reviewable CBP entries and lack of an affirmative final EAPA determination by CBP.
Due to the lapse in appropriations and Federal Government shutdown, on November 14, 2025, Commerce tolled all deadlines in administrative proceedings by 47 days.[12]
Additionally, due to a backlog of documents that were electronically filed via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS) during the Federal Government shutdown, on November 24, 2025, Commerce tolled all deadlines in administrative proceedings by an additional 21 days.[13]
Rescission of Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), it is Commerce's practice to rescind an administrative review of an order when there are no reviewable entries of subject merchandise during the POR for which liquidation is suspended.[14]
Normally, upon completion of an administrative review, the suspended entries are liquidated at the AD assessment rate for the review period.[15]
Therefore, for an administrative review to be conducted, there must be a reviewable, suspended entry that Commerce can instruct CBP to liquidate at the calculated AD assessment rate for the review period.[16]
As noted above, there were no entries of subject merchandise for the companies subject to this review during the POR.[17]
Accordingly, in the absence of suspended entries of subject merchandise during the POR, we are hereby rescinding this administrative review, in its entirety, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3).
Assessment
Commerce will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. Antidumping duties shall be assessed at rates equal to the cash deposit of estimated antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, in the United States, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of this rescission notice in the
Federal Register
Cash Deposit Requirements
As Commerce has proceeded to a final rescission of this administrative review,
( printed page 29454)
no cash deposit rates will change. Accordingly, the current cash deposit requirements shall remain in effect until further notice.
Notification Regarding the Administrative Protective Order (APO)
This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to an APO of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR.351.305, which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of the APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with regulations and terms of an APO is a violation, which is subject to sanction.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Dated: May 18, 2026.
Scot Fullerton,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations.
Footnotes
1.
See Certain Freight Rail Couplers and Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Order,88 FR 45138 (July 14, 2023) (
Order).
2.
See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review and Join Annual Inquiry Service List,90 FR 27841 (June 30, 2025).
7.
See
Petitioner's Letter, “Comments on CBP Release of Data and Clarification of Companies,” dated September 10, 2025 (Petitioner CBP Comments and Name Clarification).
11.
See
Petitioner's Letter, “Petitioner's Comments on Intent to Rescind Administrative Review,” dated February 20, 2026;
see also
Greenbrier's Letter, “Rebuttal Comments On Intent To Rescind,” dated February 27, 2026.
14.
See, e.g., Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-to-Length Plate from the Federal Republic of Germany: Rescission of Antidumping Administrative Review; 2020-2021,88 FR 4154 (January 24, 2023).
17.
While the petitioner argues that there may be misclassified entries that could be subject to this review, there are nonetheless no suspended entries in the CBP data covering the POR for the companies under review to be liquidated as a result of this review.
See
CBP Data Memorandum. CBP, not Commerce, has the ability to address the issues the petitioner raises.