This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily
Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal
Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official
electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal
Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the
corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the
daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial
informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal
Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.
For complete information about, and access to, our official publications
and services, go to
About the Federal Register
on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable
regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of
establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned
publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that
the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with
the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for
legal research should verify their results against an official edition of
the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML
rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not
provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
Rule
Enter a search term or FR citation e.g.
88 FR 38230 FR 78782024-13208USDA09/05/24RULE0503-AA39SORN
Choosing an item from
full text search results
will bring you to those results. Pressing enter in the search box
will also bring you to search results.
Choosing an item from
suggestions
will bring you directly to the content.
This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the
headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents.
This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links
has no substantive legal effect.
Document page views are updated periodically throughout the day and are
cumulative counts for this document. Counts are subject to sampling,
reprocessing and revision (up or down) throughout the day.
Page views
240
as of
10/08/2026 at 12:15 pm EDT
Other Formats
Enhanced Content - Other Formats
This document is also available in the following formats:
This PDF is FR Doc. 2026-17815 as it appeared on Public Inspection on
08/31/2026 at 8:45 am.
It was viewed
78
times while on Public Inspection.
If you are using public inspection listings for legal research, you
should verify the contents of the documents against a final, official
edition of the Federal Register. Only official editions of the
Federal Register provide legal notice of publication to the public and judicial notice
to the courts under 44 U.S.C. 1503 & 1507.
Learn more here.
Published Document: 2026-17815 (91 FR 56049)
This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.
AGENCY:
Department of Justice.
ACTION:
Final rule.
SUMMARY:
This rule makes technical amendments to relevant portions of 28 CFR part 27, the Department of Justice (Department) regulations on the protection of whistleblowers in the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), so that the provisions conform with organizational changes brought about by a restructuring of the Justice Management Division (JMD).
DATES:
Effective September 1, 2026.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
John E. Thompson, Deputy General Counsel, Justice Management Division; email:
John.E.Thompson@usdoj.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
This rule makes technical amendments to certain provisions in 28 CFR part 27 to reflect that “the Office of Attorney Recruitment and Management” has been renamed “the Office of Adjudication, Recruitment, and Management” (OARM) as part of a reorganization of JMD, which included the formal realignment of OARM to JMD.
Regulatory Analysis
In developing this rule, the Department considered numerous statutes and executive orders applicable to rulemaking. The Department's analysis of the applicability of those statutes and executive orders to this rule is summarized below.
A. Administrative Procedures Act
This rule relates to matters of agency personnel, organization, and procedure, and, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(2), it is exempt from the requirements of notice and comment and a 30-day delay in the effective date.
B. Executive Orders 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review), Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review), and Executive Order 14192 (Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation)
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, as supplemented by Executive Order 13563. This rule makes technical amendments to portions of the existing regulations that provide whistleblower protection for FBI employees and applicants to conform with organizational changes within JMD. The changes do not materially affect the number of claims or the time, cost, or resources required to address them.
Accordingly, this rule does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866. The Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed this rule under these Orders.
Further, as this rule relates to agency organization, management, or personnel, it is fully exempt from the numerical 10-for-1 and cost offset requirements of Executive Order 14192.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-12, as amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term “small entities” comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. 5 U.S.C. 601.
The Attorney General certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule does not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The rule makes technical amendments to the portions of the regulations governing the Department's internal process for addressing allegations of retaliation for protected whistleblowing by FBI employees and applicants. It has no application to small entities as defined above.
D. Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule does not call for a new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501-20.
A rule has federalism implications under Executive Order 13132 if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. E.O. 13132, sec. 1(a). The Department has analyzed this rule under that Order and determined that this rule does not have federalism implications.
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. 1531-38, requires Federal agencies to determine whether a rule, if promulgated, will result in the expenditure by State, local, or tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million (adjusted for inflation) or more in any one year. 2 U.S.C. 1532(a). This rule does not require or result in expenditures by any of the above-named entities.
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988.
( printed page 56050)
H. Executive Order 13175 (Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments)
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 13175 because it would not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
I. Congressional Review Act
The reporting requirements of the Congressional Review Act (Subtitle E of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996), 5 U.S.C. 801-08, do not apply to this rule. This rule relates primarily to agency management, personnel, and organization. 5 U.S.C. 804(3)(B). The rule makes technical amendments to 28 CFR part 27, as necessary to conform to recent Department organizational changes. This action is accordingly not a “rule” as that term is used by the Congressional Review Act,
see5 U.S.C. 804(3), and the reporting requirement of 5 U.S.C. 801 does not apply.
For the reasons stated above, the Department of Justice amends 28 CFR part 27 as follows:
PART 27—WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION FOR FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION EMPLOYEES
1. The authority citation for part 27 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 3151; 28 U.S.C. 509, 510, 515-519; 5 U.S.C. 2303; President's Memorandum to the Attorney General, Delegation of Responsibilities Concerning FBI Employees Under the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, 3 CFR p. 284 (1997); Presidential Policy Directive 19, “Protecting Whistleblowers with Access to Classified Information” (October 10, 2012).
2. Amend § 27.4 by revising the section heading and paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Corrective action and other relief; Director, Office of Adjudication, Recruitment and Management.
(a) If, in connection with any investigation, the Conducting Office determines that there are reasonable grounds to believe that a reprisal has been or will be taken, the Conducting Office shall report this conclusion, together with any findings and recommendations for corrective action, to the Director of the Office of Adjudication, Recruitment, and Management (the Director). If the Conducting Office's report to the Director includes a recommendation for corrective action, the Director shall provide an opportunity for comments on the report by the FBI and the Complainant. The Director, upon receipt of the Conducting Office's report, shall proceed in accordance with paragraphs (e) and (f) of this section. A determination by the Conducting Office that there are reasonable grounds to believe that a reprisal has been or will be taken shall not be cited or referred to in any proceeding under these regulations, without the Complainant's consent.