This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily
Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal
Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official
electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal
Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the
corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the
daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial
informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal
Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.
For complete information about, and access to, our official publications
and services, go to
About the Federal Register
on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable
regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of
establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned
publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that
the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with
the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for
legal research should verify their results against an official edition of
the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML
rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not
provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
Notice
Enter a search term or FR citation e.g.
88 FR 38230 FR 78782024-13208USDA09/05/24RULE0503-AA39SORN
Choosing an item from
full text search results
will bring you to those results. Pressing enter in the search box
will also bring you to search results.
Choosing an item from
suggestions
will bring you directly to the content.
This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the
headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents.
This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links
has no substantive legal effect.
Document page views are updated periodically throughout the day and are
cumulative counts for this document. Counts are subject to sampling,
reprocessing and revision (up or down) throughout the day.
Page views
167
as of
10/10/2026 at 4:15 pm EDT
Other Formats
Enhanced Content - Other Formats
This document is also available in the following formats:
This PDF is FR Doc. 2026-17915 as it appeared on Public Inspection on
09/01/2026 at 8:45 am.
It was viewed
11
times while on Public Inspection.
If you are using public inspection listings for legal research, you
should verify the contents of the documents against a final, official
edition of the Federal Register. Only official editions of the
Federal Register provide legal notice of publication to the public and judicial notice
to the courts under 44 U.S.C. 1503 & 1507.
Learn more here.
Published Document: 2026-17915 (91 FR 56529)
This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.
August 28, 2026.
I. Introduction
On June 5, 2026, Cboe BYX Exchange, Inc. (“Exchange”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”) [1]
and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,[2]
a proposed rule change (a) to amend Exchange Rule 11.9(d) to: (i) permit an Intermarket Sweep Order (“ISO”) to be entered as a non-displayed order and (ii) to establish the price level at which the System [3]
will consider an ISO available for other orders to be entered and (b) to amend Exchange Rule 11.9(g)(4) to permit non-displayed orders to re-price to more aggressive prices. The proposed rule change was published for comment in the
Federal Register
on June 23, 2026.[4]
On July 23, 2026, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,[5]
the Commission designated a longer period within which to determine whether to disapprove the proposed rule change.[6]
This order approves the proposed rule change.
II. Description of the Proposal
As part of its suite of order types, the Exchange currently offers Users the ability to enter ISOs, which are limit orders for a National Market System stock (“NMS stock”) that meet the following requirements: (i) when routed to a trading center, the limit order is identified as an ISO; (ii) simultaneously with the routing of the limit order identified as an ISO, one or more additional limit orders, as necessary, are routed to execute against the full displayed size of any protected bid, in the case of a limit order to sell, or the full displayed size of any protected offer, in the case of a limit order to buy, for the NMS stock with a price that is superior to the limit price of the limit order as identified as an ISO (and these additional routed orders also must be marked as ISOs).[7]
Currently, the Exchange does not permit an ISO to be entered as a Non-Displayed Order.[8]
The Exchange proposes to amend Exchange Rule 11.9(d) to: (i) permit an Intermarket Sweep Order to be entered as a Non-Displayed Order and (ii) to establish when the System will consider the limit price of an ISO to be available for other orders to be entered or to re-price to that price level. The Exchange also proposes to amend Exchange Rule 11.9(g)(4) to permit Non-Displayed Orders to re-price to more aggressive prices.[9]
Intermarket Sweep Orders
The Exchange proposes to amend Exchange Rule 11.9(d) to permit an ISO to be entered as a displayed order or as a Non-Displayed Order (a “Non-Displayed ISO”).[10]
Additionally, the Exchange proposes to introduce Exchange Rules 11.9(d)(1)-(3) that establish when the System will consider the limit price of an ISO to be available for other orders to be entered or to re-price to that price level. Proposed Exchange Rule 11.9(d)(1) would provide that upon receipt of an ISO during Regular Trading Hours,[11]
the System will consider the limit price of the ISO to be available for new orders to be entered at that price level.[12]
Resting orders would re-price to the limit price of the ISO based on User instruction, unless the ISO is not itself accepted at that price level or the ISO contains a Non-Displayed instruction.[13]
Proposed Exchange Rule 11.9(d)(2) would provide that upon receipt of an ISO during the Early Trading Session,[14]
Pre-Opening Session,[15]
or After Hours
( printed page 56530)
Trading Session,[16]
the System will not consider the limit price of an ISO to be available for new orders to be entered at that price, and resting orders will not re-price based on the limit price of the ISO.[17]
Proposed Exchange Rule 11.9(d)(3) would provide that notwithstanding subparagraphs (1) and (2), the System will consider the limit price of an ISO entered during Regular Trading Hours to remain available for new orders to be entered or resting orders to re-price based on User instruction if such order remains eligible for execution during the After Hours Trading Session.[18]
The System will not consider the limit price of an ISO entered during the Early Trading Session or Pre-Opening Session to be available for new orders to be entered or resting orders to re-price based on User instruction if such order remains eligible for execution during Regular Trading Hours or during the After Hours Trading Session.[19]
Non-Displayed Order Sliding
The Exchange also proposes to amend Exchange Rule 11.9(g)(4) (“Non-Displayed Order Sliding”) to permit Users to elect multiple price sliding for Non-Displayed Orders. Currently, a Non-Displayed Order containing a price slide instruction that crosses the Protected Quotation of an away market will receive a new timestamp and will be ranked by the System at the locking price and would not be re-priced by the System unless it is again crossing a Protected Quotation of an away market.[20]
The Exchange proposes to amend Exchange Rule 11.9(g)(4) to allow a User to elect to have a Non-Displayed Order re-price each time the NBBO changes and receive a new timestamp, permitting the order to be ranked at a more aggressive price without crossing a Protected Quotation of an external market. The proposal would also clarify that a Non-Displayed Order will retain its original limit price irrespective of the price at which such Non-Displayed Order is ranked.[21]
III. Discussion and Commission Findings
After careful review, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act and rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange.[22]
In particular, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,[23]
which requires, among other things, that the Exchange's rules be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest and are not designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
Permitting ISOs to be submitted with a Non-Displayed instruction will provide market participants with more flexibility in accomplishing their trading strategies and will enable Users to more effectively implement their trading strategies across market centers. Other national securities exchanges currently offer this function.[24]
The Exchange's proposed introduction of Rules 11.9(d)(1)-(3) would provide clarity regarding the System's consideration of the limit price of an ISO in different trading sessions. The Exchange's proposal to permit orders with a Non-Displayed instruction to re-price multiple times based on User instruction may allow more execution opportunities and increased liquidity at prices consistent with prevailing market conditions, which may promote more efficient price discovery.
For these reasons, the Commission finds the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act [25]
and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange.
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered,
pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act,[26]
that the proposed rule change (SR-CboeBYX-2026-026) be, and hereby is, approved.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.[27]
3.
See
Exchange Rule 1.5(aa). The term “System” means the electronic communications and trading facility designated by the Board through which securities orders of Users are consolidated for ranking, execution and, when applicable, routing away.
See
Exchange Rule 1.5(cc). The term “User” means any Member or Sponsored Participant who is authorized to obtain access to the System pursuant to Exchange Rule 11.3.
4.
See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 105710 (June 17, 2026), 91 FR 37451 (“Notice”). The Commission has not received any comment letters on the proposed rule change.
24.
See
Notice,
supra
note 4, 91 FR at 37452 (citing The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC's Equity Rule 4, Rule 4702(b)(3)(C), which states that a Non-Displayed Order may be designated as an ISO).
See also
Nasdaq Texas, LLC's Equity Rule 4, Rule 4702(3)(C); Nasdaq PHLX LLC's Equity Rule 4, Rule 3301A(b)(3)(C).