This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily
Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal
Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official
electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal
Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the
corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the
daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial
informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal
Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.
For complete information about, and access to, our official publications
and services, go to
About the Federal Register
on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable
regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of
establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned
publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that
the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with
the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for
legal research should verify their results against an official edition of
the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML
rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not
provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
Presidential Document
Enter a search term or FR citation e.g.
88 FR 38230 FR 78782024-13208USDA09/05/24RULE0503-AA39SORN
Choosing an item from
full text search results
will bring you to those results. Pressing enter in the search box
will also bring you to search results.
Choosing an item from
suggestions
will bring you directly to the content.
This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the
headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents.
This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links
has no substantive legal effect.
Document page views are updated periodically throughout the day and are
cumulative counts for this document. Counts are subject to sampling,
reprocessing and revision (up or down) throughout the day.
Page views
940
as of
10/11/2026 at 10:15 am EDT
Other Formats
Enhanced Content - Other Formats
This document is also available in the following formats:
This PDF is FR Doc. 2026-19335 as it appeared on Public Inspection on
09/18/2026 at 11:15 am.
It was viewed
32
times while on Public Inspection.
If you are using public inspection listings for legal research, you
should verify the contents of the documents against a final, official
edition of the Federal Register. Only official editions of the
Federal Register provide legal notice of publication to the public and judicial notice
to the courts under 44 U.S.C. 1503 & 1507.
Learn more here.
Published Document: 2026-19335 (91 FR 59975)
This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.
Providing Meaningful Water Quality Improvements Through Collaboration and Oversight of Federal Support
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and in furtherance of the purposes of the Clean Water Act of 1972, as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251et seq.), it is hereby ordered:
Section 1
.
Purpose and Policy.
The Chesapeake Bay is the largest estuary in the United States and serves a critically important economic purpose to the communities it directly and indirectly touches. In managing the Chesapeake Bay, as with other resources, governmental actors should prioritize environmental protection and economic objectives. Executive Order 13508 of May 12, 2009 (Chesapeake Bay Protection and Restoration), which has been in effect for 17 years, instituted a broad mandate for States and municipalities to contribute to improving the environmental health of the Chesapeake Bay, without providing clarity on how to implement that order's requirements.
In some instances, this lack of clarity has led to harmful economic impacts on affected Americans. For example, many localities have implemented stormwater management fees, commonly referred to as “rain taxes,” that impose hundreds of dollars in annual financial burdens on residents and small businesses in the name of implementing Executive Order 13508, though nothing in that order required or explicitly justified such measures, with little to no measurable benefits to Chesapeake Bay or to those residents. States use these rain taxes to pay for their stormwater infrastructure, whether or not it contributes to the environmental health of the Chesapeake Bay.
Since Executive Order 13508 was signed, a number of other Federal, State, and local government initiatives and programs have resulted in significant improvements in water quality in the Chesapeake Bay. As of 2025, the jurisdictions of the Chesapeake Bay watershed—New York, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Virginia, the District of Columbia, Delaware, and West Virginia—have collectively met 100 percent of their goal for sediment reduction, 90 percent of their goal for phosphorus reduction, and 57 percent of their goal for nitrogen reduction. These pollution reductions are improving Chesapeake Bay health and have resulted in thousands of acres of restored reefs and remain consistent with commitments made in the 2025 revised Chesapeake Bay Watershed Agreement, to which the Federal Government and the executive departments and agencies (agencies) mentioned in section 3 of this order are signatories. In 2026, scientists from the College of William & Mary, the Virginia Institute of Marine Science, FlowWest, and the University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science reported that the Chesapeake Bay's annual dead zone is projected to be among the smallest since 1985, about 31 percent below the long-term average.
Given this significant progress, and the need to provide clarity on how to continue improving the environmental health of the Chesapeake Bay, it is appropriate to revoke Executive Order 13508, which relevant jurisdictions have erroneously relied on to impose rain taxes, and to implement new actions and best practices that promote the economic health and wellbeing of the communities the Chesapeake Bay serves.
Sec. 2
.
Revocation of Order.Executive Order 13508 is hereby revoked.
( printed page 59976)
Sec. 3
.
Prioritization of Programs Directly Benefiting and Protecting Bay Health.
(a) The Secretary of War, the Secretary of the Interior, the Secretary of Agriculture, the Secretary of Commerce, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency shall assess the current support that their respective agencies provide for the health of the Chesapeake Bay and focus any resources—fiscal or personnel—on more direct, on-the-ground projects, in areas of highest need, that would result in the most impactful water quality improvements. All agencies that provide funding to support the health of the Chesapeake Bay shall prioritize funding in a manner that addresses water quality goals directly, redirecting funding away from activities that do not generate measurable progress towards stated goals, to implementation of projects that will directly reduce nutrient and sediment run-off into the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries.
(b) The Environmental Protection Agency shall coordinate with the States of Maryland, Virginia, Pennsylvania, Delaware, New York, and West Virginia, and the District of Columbia, to:
(i) assess the additional financial burdens placed on residents of these jurisdictions through the imposition of stormwater management fees;
(ii) explore initiatives and opportunities to effectuate this order and promote the environmental health of the Chesapeake Bay that do not increase costs on individual residents of these jurisdictions; and
(iii) take measures to encourage the repeal or rescission of stormwater management fees imposed by States or localities and funded by their respective residents.
(c) Actions taken pursuant to this section shall prioritize strategies that are grounded in objective metrics and proven water management practices, supported by empirical data and scientific analysis, and measurable in impact. Strategies shall use and rigorously document performance indicators and outcomes, such as reductions in sediment, phosphorus, and nitrogen loads, and improvements in water quality.
Sec. 4
.
General Provisions.
(a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:
(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or
(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.
( printed page 59977)
(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
(d) The costs of publication of this order shall be borne by the Environmental Protection Agency.