[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 175 (Friday, September 12, 2025)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 44151-44153]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-17700]


========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of 
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these 
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in 
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 175 / Friday, September 12, 2025 / 
Proposed Rules

[[Page 44151]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Marketing Service

7 CFR Part 987

[Doc. No. AMS-SC-24-0049]


Domestic Dates Produced or Packed in Riverside County, 
California; Decreased Assessment Rate

AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This proposed rule would implement a recommendation from the 
California Date Administrative Committee (Committee) to decrease the 
assessment rate established for the 2024-2025 and subsequent crop years 
from $0.15 to $0.05 per hundredweight for domestic dates produced or 
packed in Riverside County, California. The proposed assessment rate 
would remain in effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or 
terminated.

DATES: Comments must be received by October 14, 2025.

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments 
concerning this proposed rule. Comments can be sent to the Docket 
Clerk, Market Development Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 
1400 Independence Avenue SW, STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237. 
Comments can also be sent to the Docket Clerk electronically by Email: 
[email protected] or via the internet at: https://www.regulations.gov. Comments should reference the document number and 
the date and page number of this issue of the Federal Register. 
Comments submitted in response to this proposed rule will be included 
in the record, will be made available to the public, and can be viewed 
at: https://www.regulations.gov. Please be advised that the identity of 
the individuals or entities submitting the comments will be made public 
on the internet at the address provided above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bianca Bertrand, Marketing Specialist, 
or Abigail Maharaj, Chief, West Region Branch, Market Development 
Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487-
5901, or Email: [email protected] or [email protected].
    Small businesses may request information on complying with this 
regulation by contacting Antoinette Carter, Market Development 
Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue 
SW, STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-8085, or 
Email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This action, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, 
proposes to amend regulations issued to carry out a marketing order as 
defined in 7 CFR 900.2(j). This proposed rule is issued under Marketing 
Order No. 987, as amended (7 CFR part 987), regulating the handling of 
domestic dates produced or packed in Riverside County, California. Part 
987 (referred to as the ``Order'') is effective under the Agricultural 
Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), 
hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.'' The Committee locally 
administers the Order and is comprised of producers and handlers of 
dates operating within the area of production.
    The Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) is issuing this rule in 
conformance with Executive Order 12866, as amended by Executive Order 
13563. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public 
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive 
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and 
benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility. 
This action falls within a category of regulatory actions that the 
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) exempted from Executive Order 
12866 review.
    This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 13175--
Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, which 
requires federal agencies to consider whether their rulemaking actions 
would have tribal implications. AMS has determined that this rule is 
unlikely to have substantial direct effects on one or more Indian 
tribes, on the relationship between the federal government and Indian 
tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between 
the federal government and Indian tribes.
    This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988--
Civil Justice Reform. Under the Order now in effect, California date 
handlers are subject to assessments. Funds to administer the Order are 
derived from such assessments. It is intended that the assessment rate 
would be applicable to all assessable dates for the 2024-2025 crop 
year, and continue until amended, suspended, or terminated.
    The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted 
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the 
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with the U.S. Department 
of Agriculture (USDA) a petition stating that the order, any provision 
of the order, or any obligation imposed in connection with the order, 
is not in accordance with law and request a modification of the order 
or to be exempted therefrom. Such handler is afforded the opportunity 
for a hearing on the petition. After the hearing, USDA would rule on 
the petition. The Act provides that the district court of the United 
States in any district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has 
his or her principal place of business, has jurisdiction to review 
USDA's ruling on the petition, provided an action is filed not later 
than 20 days after the date of the entry of the ruling.
    This proposed rule would decrease the assessment rate for 
California dates handled under the Order from $0.15 per hundredweight, 
the rate that was established for the 2023-2024 and subsequent crop 
years, to $0.05 per hundredweight for the 2024-2025 and subsequent crop 
years.
    Sections 987.71 and 987.72 of the Order authorize the Committee, 
with the approval of AMS, to formulate an annual budget of expenses and 
collect assessments from handlers to administer the program. The 
members of the Committee are familiar with the Committee's needs and 
with the costs of goods and services in their local area and can 
formulate an appropriate

[[Page 44152]]

budget and assessment rate. The assessment rate is formulated and 
discussed in a public meeting, and all directly affected persons have 
an opportunity to participate and provide input.
    For the 2023-2024 and subsequent crop years, the Committee 
recommended, and AMS approved, an assessment rate of $0.15 per 
hundredweight of California dates within the production area. That rate 
continues in effect from crop year to crop year until modified, 
suspended, or terminated by AMS upon recommendation and information 
submitted by the Committee or other information available to AMS.
    The Committee met on June 27, 2024, and unanimously recommended 
2024-2025 crop year expenditures of $89,410 and an assessment rate of 
$0.05 per hundredweight of California dates handled for the 2024-2025 
and subsequent crop years. In comparison, last crop year's budgeted 
expenditures were $75,800. The proposed assessment rate of $0.05 per 
hundredweight is $0.10 lower than the rate currently in effect. The 
Committee recommended decreasing the assessment rate to draw down its 
reserve funds to within a level authorized under the marketing order. 
The Committee projects 300,000 hundredweight of assessable California 
dates for the 2024-2025 crop year, down from the 426,000 hundredweight 
that the Committee initially projected for the 2023-2024 crop year.
    The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2024-
2025 crop year include $58,500 for management services, $19,410 for 
office administration, and $11,500 for the financial audit. For 
comparison, budgeted expenses for these items during the 2023-2024 crop 
year were $48,000; $16,800; and $11,000, respectively.
    The Committee derived the recommended assessment rate by 
considering anticipated crop year expenses, expected volume of 
assessable dates, and the amount of funds available in the authorized 
reserve. The expected 300,000 hundredweight of assessable California 
dates would generate $15,000 in assessment revenue at the proposed rate 
(300,000 hundredweight multiplied by the $0.05 assessment rate). The 
income generated from handler assessments, along with approximately 
$68,310 in reserve funds and $6,100 of surplus allocation income from 
the date cull program would be sufficient to meet the Committee's 
estimated program expenditures of $89,410 for the 2024-2025 crop year. 
Funds available in the financial reserve (currently about $129,000) 
would be kept within the maximum permitted by the Order (not to exceed 
the average of annual expenses for the preceding five years, as 
authorized in Sec.  987.72).
    The proposed assessment rate would continue in effect indefinitely 
unless modified, suspended, or terminated by AMS upon recommendation 
and information submitted by the Committee or other available 
information. Although this assessment rate would be in effect for an 
indefinite period, the Committee will continue to meet prior to or 
during each crop year to recommend a budget of expenses and consider 
recommendations for modification of the assessment rate. The dates and 
times of Committee meetings are available from the Committee or AMS. 
Committee meetings are open to the public and interested persons may 
express their views at these meetings. AMS will evaluate Committee 
recommendations and other available information to determine whether 
modification of the assessment rate is needed. Further rulemaking would 
be undertaken as necessary. The Committee's 2024-2025 crop year budget, 
and those for subsequent crop years, will be reviewed and, as 
appropriate, approved by AMS.

Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

    Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility 
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), AMS has considered the economic impact of 
this proposed rule on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has prepared 
this initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
    The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of 
businesses subject to such actions in order that small businesses will 
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued 
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in 
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small 
entities acting on their own behalf.
    There are approximately 11 handlers of California dates subject to 
regulation under the Order and 70 producers of California dates in the 
production area. At the time this analysis was prepared, the Small 
Business Administration (SBA) defined small agricultural service firms 
as those having annual receipts of equal to or less than $34,000,000 
(North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 115114, 
Postharvest Crop Activities), and small agricultural producers of dates 
are defined as those having annual receipts equal to or less than 
$3,500,000 (NAICS code 111339, Other Noncitrus Fruit Farming) (13 CFR 
121.201).
    According to the USDA's National Agricultural Statistics Service 
(NASS), data for the most-recently completed crop year (2023) shows 
that the average price producers received for California dates was 
$2,630 per ton, with an estimated production of 35,300 tons. Using the 
average price producers received, production information, and the 
number of producers, the majority of producers have estimated annual 
receipts of less than $3,500,000 ($2,630 multiplied by 35,300 tons 
equals $92,839,000, divided by 70 producers equals $1,326,271 per 
producer). Thus, the majority of California date producers may be 
classified as small entities according to the SBA definition.
    In addition, USDA Market News reported an average terminal market 
price of $43.09 per 11-pound carton for the 2023 calendar year 
(California origin, Medjool variety, non-organic, all terminal markets, 
all grades and sizes). With approximately 70,600,000 pounds handled, 
the industry would have shipped an estimated 6,418,182, 11-pound 
cartons (70,600,000 divided by 11-pound carton) of packaged dates for a 
total value of $276,559,462 (6,418,182 multiplied by $43.09). With 11 
date handlers within the production area, the 2023 average revenue per 
handler is estimated to be $25,141,769 ($276,559,462 divided by 11), 
which is below the $34.5 million SBA size threshold for handlers. Thus, 
assuming a normal distribution, most California date handlers may be 
classified as small entities.
    This proposal would decrease the assessment rate collected from 
handlers for the 2024-2025 and subsequent crop years from $0.15 to 
$0.05 per hundredweight of assessable California dates. The Committee 
unanimously recommended 2024-2025 crop year expenditures of $89,410 and 
an assessment rate of $0.05 per hundredweight of California dates. The 
proposed assessment rate of $0.05 is $0.10 lower than the rate 
currently in effect. The Committee expects the industry to handle 
300,000 hundredweight of assessable California dates during the 2024-
2025 crop year. Thus, the $0.05 per hundredweight rate should provide 
$15,000 in assessment income (300,000 hundredweight multiplied by $0.05 
per hundredweight). Income derived from handler assessments along with 
reserve funds should be sufficient to meet budgeted expenditures for 
the 2024-2025 crop year.
    The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the

[[Page 44153]]

2024-2025 crop year include $58,500 for management services, $19,410 
for office administration, and $11,500 for the financial audit. In 
comparison, budgeted expenses for these items during the 2023-2024 crop 
year were $48,000; $16,800; and $11,000, respectively.
    The Committee recommended decreasing the assessment rate to utilize 
funds from its reserve to meet necessary expenses for the 2024-2025 
crop year, and ensure the reserve is maintained at a level in 
compliance with order requirements.
    Prior to arriving at this budget and assessment rate 
recommendation, the Committee discussed various alternatives, including 
reducing the assessment rate more and/or less than the rate proposed 
herein. However, the Committee determined that the recommended 
assessment rate would achieve its goals of both adequately funding 
Committee operations and reducing the reserve to an appropriate level. 
Consequently, those alternatives were rejected.
    A review of historical and preliminary information pertaining to 
the upcoming crop year indicates the average producer price for the 
2024-2025 crop year should be approximately $2,847 per ton ($142.35 per 
hundredweight) of California dates. Therefore, the estimated assessment 
revenue for the 2024-2025 crop year as a percentage of total producer 
revenue would be about 0.04 percent ($0.05 per hundredweight assessment 
rate divided by $142.35 and multiplied by 100).
    This proposed action would decrease the assessment obligation 
imposed on California date handlers. Assessments are applied uniformly 
on all handlers, and some of the costs may be passed on to producers. 
However, these costs are expected to be offset by the benefits derived 
by the operation of the Order.
    The Committee's meetings are widely publicized throughout the 
California date industry and all interested persons are invited to 
attend the meetings and participate in Committee deliberations on all 
issues. Like all Committee meetings, the June 27, 2024, meeting was a 
public meeting and all entities, both large and small, were able to 
express views on this issue. Finally, interested persons are invited to 
submit comments on this proposed rule, including the regulatory and 
information collection impacts of this action on small businesses.
    In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, (44 U.S.C. 
Chapter 35), the Order's information collection requirements have been 
previously approved by OMB and assigned OMB No. 0581-0178, Vegetable 
and Specialty Crops. No changes in those requirements would be 
necessary as a result of this proposed rule. Should any changes become 
necessary, they would be submitted to OMB for approval.
    This proposed rule would not impose any additional reporting or 
recordkeeping requirements on either small or large California date 
handlers. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and 
forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and 
duplication by industry and public sector agencies.
    AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote 
the use of the internet and other information technologies to provide 
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information 
and services, and for other purposes.
    AMS has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, 
overlap, or conflict with this proposed rule.
    A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and 
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: 
https://www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses. Any 
questions about the compliance guide should be sent to Antoinette 
Carter at the previously mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
    After consideration of all relevant material presented, including 
the information and recommendations submitted by the Committee and 
other available information, AMS has determined that this proposed rule 
is consistent with and would effectuate the purposes of the Act.
    A 30-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons to 
respond to this proposed rule. All written comments timely received 
will be considered before a final determination is made on this 
rulemaking.

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 987

    Dates, Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements.

    For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Agricultural 
Marketing Service proposes to amend 7 CFR part 987 as follows:

PART 987--DOMESTIC DATES PRODUCED OR PACKED IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY, 
CALIFORNIA

0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 987 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.

0
2. Revise Sec.  987.339 to read as follows:


Sec.  987.339  Assessment rate.

    On and after October 1, 2024, an assessment rate of $0.05 per 
hundredweight is established for dates produced or packed in Riverside 
County, California.

Erin Morris,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2025-17700 Filed 9-11-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P