Immigration and Naturalization Service, Justice.
Proposed rule.
This rule proposes to amend the Immigration and Naturalization Service (Service) regulations governing the retention and reporting of information regarding F, J, and M nonimmigrants. This rule will implement the Student and Exchange Visitor Information System (SEVIS), and establish a process for electronic reporting by designated school officials (DSO) of information required to be reported to the Service. This is necessary to improve and streamline the reporting and record keeping of F, J, and M nonimmigrants. This rule also proposes to amend the existing regulations relating to F and M students to improve accountability and to implement reasonable and clear standards governing the maintenance, extension and reinstatement of student status.
Written comments must be submitted on or before June 17, 2002.
Please submit written comments to the Director, Regulations and Forms Services Division, Immigration and Naturalization Service, 425 I Street, NW., Room 4034, Washington, DC 20536. To ensure proper handling, please reference INS No. 2185–02 on your correspondence. Comments may also be submitted electronically to the Service at
Maura Deadrick, Assistant Director, Adjudications Division, Immigration and Naturalization Service, 425 I Street NW., Room 3040, Washington, DC 20536, telephone (202) 514–3228.
The Immigration and Nationality Act (Act) provides for the admission of various classification of nonimmigrants, who are foreign nationals having a residence in a foreign country which they have no intention of abandoning, and who are seeking temporary admission to the United States. The purpose of the nonimmigrant's intended stay in the United State determines his or her proper nonimmigrant classification.
F–1 nonimmigrants, as defined in section 101(a)(15)(F) of the Act, are foreign students pursuing a full course of study in a college, university, seminary, conservatory, academic high school, private elementary school, other academic institution, or language training program in the United States that has been approved by the Service to enroll foreign students. For the purposes of this rule, the term “school” refers to all of these types of Service-approved institutions. An F–2 nonimmigrant is a foreign national who is the spouse or qualifying child (under the age of 21) of an F–1 nonimmigrant.
J–1 nonimmigrants, as defined in section 101(a)(15)(J) of the Act, are foreign nationals who have been selected by a sponsor designated by the United States Department of State (DOS) (formerly the United States Information Agency (USIA)) to participate in an exchange visitor program in the United States. The J–1 classification includes, among others, aliens participating in programs under which they will receive graduate medical education or training. For purposes of this rule, “exchange visitor program” refers to all organizations or institutions designated by the Department of State to conduct an exchange program. A J–2 nonimmigrant is a foreign national who is the spouse or qualifying child (under the age of 21) of a J–1 nonimmigrant.
M–1 nonimmigrants, as defined in section 101(a)(15)(M) of the Act, are foreign nationals pursuing a full course of study at a Service-approved vocational school or other recognized nonacademic institution (other than in language training programs) in the United States. The term “school” for the purposes of this proposed rule also encompasses all institutions approved for attendance by M–1 students. An M–2 nonimmigrant is a foreign national who is the spouse or qualifying child (under the age of 21) of an M–1 nonimmigrant.
(Among the kinds of schools approved for attendance by M–1 students are flight training schools. The Service notes that section 113 of the Aviation and Transportation Security Act, Public Law 107–71 (Nov. 19, 2001), imposes new restrictions on providing flight training to aliens and requires a prior notification to the Attorney General before such training can begin. The requirements of that law are separate from, and in addition to, the law and regulations governing M–1 students. The Department of Justice has already published public notices pertaining to section 113 at 67 FR 2238 (Jan. 16, 2002) and 67 FR 6051 (Feb. 8, 2002), and the Department will be promulgating implementing rules in a separate proceeding.)
Section 641 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA), Public Law 104–208, Div. C (Sept. 30, 1996), directs the Attorney General to develop and conduct a program to collect current information, on an ongoing basis, from schools and exchange programs relating to nonimmigrant foreign students and exchange aliens during the course of their stay in the United States, using electronic reporting technology to the fullest extent practicable.
SEVIS implements this requirement. SEVIS is an internet-based system that provides users with access to accurate and current information on nonimmigrant foreign students, exchange aliens, and their dependents. SEVIS will enable schools and exchange programs to transmit electronic information and event notifications, via the Internet, to the Service and the Department of State throughout a
Currently, for F–1 and M–1 students, schools are required to maintain local records on each nonimmigrant student, and to produce such information upon request by the Service. In order to enroll a nonimmigrant student, a school, at the time of offering acceptance, must complete and send a multi-copy paper Form I–20A–B, Certificate of Eligibility for Nonimmigrant (F–1) Student Status for Academic and Language Students, or Form I–20M–N, Certificate of Eligibility for Nonimmigrant (M–1) Student Status For Vocational Students. A copy of the Form I–20 is maintained by the school, a copy is provided to the nonimmigrant, and a copy is routed to the Service for data-entry into a mainframe database, processed, and then returned to the school for inclusion in its local record. Other than entry into a mainframe database, which is not accessible for use by the school, the current process is entirely manual and paper-based.
SEVIS creates a means for information collection and reporting via the Internet and a reduction in data latency and paper record maintenance and routing. In order to create a Form I–20, the school will now access SEVIS and enter the information electronically, thus instantly collecting the data in a central database before the form is ever printed. There will no longer be a need for multiple copies of the forms, since the Service will not need a copy to be routed for data-entry. Likewise, the school will no longer be required to maintain its own paper copy of the record, since it will be accessible to the school through SEVIS. Once it is fully operational and all affected schools are mandated to utilize the system, SEVIS will completely replace and aggregate the Service's existing mainframe database, the Student/School system (STSC).
Similarly, at present, an exchange visitor program admitting J–1 exchange aliens currently must complete a Form DS–2019 (previously Form IAP–66). Under SEVIS, exchange programs will use SEVIS to enter information electronically and generate a Form DS–2019 for their participating exchange aliens. For clarification purposes, sections of this text that refer specifically to a Form I–20 or DS–2019 issued from SEVIS will refer to the forms as a SEVIS Form I–20 or SEVIS Form DS–2019.
Currently, SEVIS is anticipated to begin implementation for participation on a voluntary basis on July 1, 2002. Participation in SEVIS at first will be voluntary, but will become required on January 30, 2003. The Department of State will issue separate regulations establishing a compliance date for all exchange visitor programs.
Once use of SEVIS is mandatory, all schools approved by the Service must be using SEVIS in order to continue accepting foreign students and all exchange visitor programs must be using SEVIS to enroll exchange aliens. Thereafter, only SEVIS Forms I–20 for F–1 or M–1 students or SEVIS Form DS–2019 for J–1 exchange aliens can be used for entry into the United States, change of nonimmigrant classification, reinstatement, transfer, extension, or any other immigration benefit.
The Service recognizes that the compulsory date of January 30, 2003, may pose challenges for schools as there may be changes to existing systems and processes required of schools in order to be in compliance. Therefore, the Service is soliciting comments from the schools regarding the amount of time the schools believe will be necessary to convert to the SEVIS system. Commenters should state specifically the steps that must be taken before being able to fully convert to SEVIS and indicate particular problems or obstacles that may be faced in trying to meet the proposed deadline. The Service will consider the information provided in the comments in the drafting of the final rule.
In the meantime, there will be schools and exchange visitor programs that continue to use the existing paper-based processes and others that begin to use SEVIS, as they choose. This phased-in approach will allow schools and exchange visitor programs sufficient time to conform their internal processes to a system that will successfully interface with SEVIS.
Accordingly, this proposed rule amends § 214.2(f) and (m) of the Service's regulations to allow for different reporting processes for schools prior to the final SEVIS implementation date, depending upon whether or not they have been enrolled in SEVIS. These alternative processes are clearly distinguished in the text of this proposed rule. The Service will publish a rule when SEVIS becomes mandatory to remove all references in the regulations to paper-based processes.
The Department of State's separate rule will provide the appropriate processes for exchange visitor programs to follow with respect to J nonimmigrants, depending on whether or not those programs have been enrolled in SEVIS during the time before use of SEVIS becomes mandatory.
Although IIRIRA section 641 mandates the development of a new information collection program, the Service is also pursuing this system as a result of its recognition that the current reporting process for foreign student and exchange aliens is not an effective means to maintain timely information on F, J, and M nonimmigrants. Under the current paper-based system, the Service is unable to provide expedient responses to benefit requests, such as for employment authorizations and reinstatements. By reengineering the information reporting program from a paper-based process to one that is automated, the Service anticipates an improved system for the Service and DOS, for the schools and exchange visitor programs subject to their authority, and for the foreign students and exchange aliens coming to the United States to attend them.
The Service believes that SEVIS will have a positive impact on schools and will make the oversight of foreign students on their campuses and administration of international student programs easier for most DSOs. Schools using SEVIS will no longer have to print out, file, and mail as many paper forms. However, each institution is different and will have processes and systems that are unique. For schools that do not require or desire the use of batch capability, there should be little to no additional cost, and in fact, some savings may result from the efficiencies that SEVIS will provide. These schools will access SEVIS through the Internet and in all likelihood will have to make no changes or upgrades to their existing systems. As long as the school has an Internet browser, MS Internet Explorer 5.0 or better, or Netscape 4.7 or better, they can access SEVIS.
The monetary impact on schools that desire to use batch capability may be greater. These schools may need to pay the cost of whatever modifications are necessary to make their existing systems compatible with that of SEVIS. However, that one-time start-up cost might be highly cost-effective in the long run because, once the electronic interface is complete, the process of maintaining student records for purpose of SEVIS will be highly automated, thereby reducing the future personnel costs. Moreover, these decisions as to cost/benefit tradeoffs will be made by each school in light of their own circumstances. The use of the batch
In order for the Service to better gauge what monetary impact, if any, there will be on schools, the Service is soliciting comments specifically related to this issue. Schools are requested to comment on what they believe will be the cost to bring their existing equipment and systems into compliance with SEVIS and or any increases or decreases necessary for staff.
In order to maintain the integrity of the data that is initially being entered into SEVIS, all schools will need to be recertified by the Service. The Service will be publishing a separate notice in the
This rule proposes a process by which a school may use SEVIS to maintain its authorization for attendance at that school by F–1 and M–1 nonimmigrant students. To gain access to SEVIS, the school must first contact the SEVIS system administrator to receive a temporary User ID and password by logging onto the SEVIS Web site. The temporary ID and password will be valid for 30 days from issuance by the system administrator.
After receiving the temporary ID and password, the school will complete the Form I–17 petition in SEVIS and print it for submission by mail to the appropriate Service office with supporting documentation. Upon making a decision, the Service will update SEVIS to show the status of the application as approved or denied and an email notification will be sent to the school. Every school using SEVIS must immediately update SEVIS to reflect any material modification to its name, address or curriculum for a determination of continued eligibility for approval.
As stated earlier, the Service will be promulgating a separate rule to implement the recertification process that a school needs to complete prior to being given authorization to use SEVIS. With these future rulemakings it is the Service's intention to move toward a paperless process for institutions to submit petitions for approval to the Service. In drafting these subsequent rules, the Service will consider streamlined electronic processes in use at other agencies. Where possible, the Service will make efforts to share information electronically with the Department of Education to refine the approval criteria and supporting documentation to allow for this paperless submission process.
The Department of State's separate rule will describe the process for exchange visitor programs to enroll in SEVIS.
This rule proposes that schools that enroll in SEVIS prior to the final SEVIS compliance date may utilize SEVIS initially only for newly-enrolled students; they will not be required to enter all data for their current students into the SEVIS system at the same time, but may do so. However, if a current student needs a new Form I–20, the school must enter the student into SEVIS at that time in order to issue a SEVIS Form I–20 to the alien. The current student is entered into SEVIS as a “continuing” student to transition from a paper to a SEVIS record and is thereafter under SEVIS processes. Such a “continuing” indicator will eventually be deactivated in SEVIS since all students will be included in SEVIS within the next academic cycle after the compliance date and there will not be any non-SEVIS students that would require a “continuing” functionality for the DSO to convert. Moreover, once a school is utilizing SEVIS, the school will be required to report the enrollment of any F–1 or M–1 nonimmigrant every semester, term or session thereafter. In addition, the school will be required to report, in SEVIS, the current students that fail to enroll, maintain status, or complete his or her program.
The substantive regulations governing the approval of exchange visitor programs and the granting of J nonimmigrant visas are promulgated by the Department of State, and will be addressed in a separate rule. Accordingly, much of the following discussion in this preamble focuses specifically on the F and M nonimmigrants who are subject to the Service's authority, and the Service-approved schools authorized to enroll them.
Section 214.3(g) requires that the school maintain records of the student's name, date and place of birth, country of citizenship, address, status, date of commencement of studies, degree program and field of study, practical training, termination date and reason, documents related to the student's admission, the number of credits completed per semester, and a photocopy of the student's Form I–20. A school is responsible for maintaining this information on every student to whom it has issued a Form I–20 while the student is attending the school and until the Designated School Official (DSO) notifies the Service that the student is no longer attending the school. Schools are also required to furnish the information to the Service upon request. Under the current process, a DSO is only required to notify the Service if a student is no longer attending the school when the Service sends a list of all F–1 and M–1 students who, according to Service records, and attending the school.
SEVIS, as implemented by this rule, will alleviate some of the problems faced by the DSO by facilitating the process of notifying the Service of a change in information in a timely way. It will also assist the Service by providing access to current data. All of the information that the DSO is currently required to maintain will still be required. However, the information will now also reside in SEVIS rather than at each individual school.
The maintenance of the information in SEVIS begins with the creation of the student's SEVIS Form I–20. Any subsequent updates to the SEVIS Form I–20, or other changes of information pertaining to the student, will also be captured in SEVIS. This will reduce the DSO's workload and the need for a Service officer to contact the school for access to these records.
The Service has incorporated the requirements of Section 641 of IIRIRA, which mandates collecting the current address and current academic status of the student, as well as any disciplinary action taken by the school against the student as a result of the student being convicted of a crime. Schools will use
• A student's enrollment at the school;
• The start date of the student's next term or session;
• A student's failure to enroll;
• A student dropping below a full course of study without prior authorization by the DSO;
• Any other failure to maintain status or complete the program;
• A change of the student's or dependent's legal name or address;
• Any disciplinary action taken by the school against the student as a result of the student being convicted of a crime; and
• A student's graduation prior to the program end date listed on the Form I–20.
Additionally, within 21 days of a change in the name, address, or curriculum of a school, this rule requires that a DSO update SEVIS with the current information. In certain instances SEVIS will send a “tickler” to a DSO when a student's record has not received any action for an extended length of time. When a DSO receives such a notification request by SEVIS with regard to the current status of the student, the DSO must review the student's record and update SEVIS to indicate that the student is enrolled or take other appropriate action.
The Service also notes that legislation currently pending before the Congress, section 501 of H.R. 1885 (as passed by the House of Representatives on March 12, 2002), would impose a requirement for schools and exchange visitor programs to report additional items of information with respect to students and exchange aliens, namely:
• Within a thirty-day period, the failure of the student or exchange visitor to enroll or commence participation;
• Date of entry and port-of-entry;
• The date of the alien's enrollment in an approved institution or exchange program;
• Degree program and field of study; and
• The date of the termination of enrollment and the reason for termination.
Although not identical, all of these data elements are reflected in the current SEVIS requirements. If this legislation is enacted, the Service will review it to determine what, if any new statutory reporting requirements are created. If necessary, the Service will impose any such additional requirements after this proposed rule is published by incorporating those statutory requirements (without further rulemaking notice) into any interim or final rule implementing SEVIS.
Currently, 8 CFR 214.3 allows a school (or each campus of the school) to have up to five Designated School Officials. This rule proposes to create a new category of Designated School Official, the Principal Designated School Official (PDSO), and a new support position, the Administrative School Official (ASO). Each school may have five DSOs, one of which is the PDSO, and up to five ASOs. In a multi-campus school, each campus may have up to five designated officials at any one time, one of which is the PDSO, and up to five ASOs. In an elementary or secondary school system, however, the entire school system is limited to five designated officials at any one time, one of which is the PDSO, and up to five ASOs.
Another alternative that the Service is considering is to correlate the number of DSOs allowed to the size of the school's F–1 and M–1 student population. Comment is invited on the general feasibility of such an approach, particularly with respect to the proportion of DSOs to international students currently existing and the proportion that would be optimal for schools.
In SEVIS, the PDSO will be the contact person for the original submission of the Form I–17. The PDSO will also be the responsible party for any updates to the PDSO, DSO or ASO information. In all other respects, the PDSO will have the same responsibilities as the other DSOs.
The functions of the ASO will be limited to clerical duties and data entry. The ASO may not sign or issue either a current or SEVIS Form I–20, authorize curricular practical training, or provide any update to SEVIS. The access of the ASO will be limited in SEVIS to purely data entry of SEVIS Form I–20 information which must then be reviewed and submitted to SEVIS by a PDSO or DSO.
This rule also proposes a new requirement that any DSO, including the PDSO, must be a United States citizen or Lawful Permanent Resident (LPR) of the United States.
This rule proposes to require that an approved school update SEVIS for any changes in PDSO, DSO or ASO within 21 days of such change. The update of the new official must include the name and title of the new official, as well as the official's certification of compliance with the regulations. This update can be made only by the PDSO.
This rule also proposes to clarify that, as part of the Service's authority over a school's ability to enroll foreign students, the Service has authority to reject the submission of a particular individual as a DSO, PDSO, or ASO as well as to withdraw an individual's designation as a DSO, PDSO, or ASO. Examples of when the Service would exercise this authority include situations in which a DSO is not a U.S. citizen or LPR, or in which a PDSO, DSO or ASO is not complying with the relevant regulations and program requirements as attested to on Form I–17A, Designated School Officials.
Finally, although the Service is not making a specific proposal at this time, the Service is seeking public suggestions and input on how a program for educating and certifying DSOs might be structured, and whether such certification should be a requirement for all PDSOs, DSOs, and/or ASOs. DSOs are the link between the Service and the nonimmigrant student population for which the Service is responsible. It is not practical or feasible for the Service to have a presence at all schools. These factors, along with the Service's desire to preserve the integrity of data submitted through the SEVIS system, have highlighted the need for a process that can certify DSOs.
This proposed rule discusses the differences in the Form I–20ID, Form I–20A–B, and Form I–20M–N that are currently in use and the Form I–20 that will be issued by SEVIS. The current Form I–20 has two copies, one for the student, and one for the school. Currently, the entire Form I–20A–B/I–20ID or Form I–20M–N/I–20ID is referred to as the Form I–20A–B or Form I–20M–N, and the student copy is referred to as the Form I–20ID.
The SEVIS Form I–20 will eliminate the need for the school copy, as the information will be retained in SEVIS and easily accessible by the school or by the Service for updating and record keeping purposes. The student will retain his or her copy in the same manner as the process currently in use for travel and employment purposes. The SEVIS Form I–20 will also maintain the distinction between the Form I–20A–B that is issued to F–1 students and the Form I–20M–N that is issued to M–1 students. The SEVIS Form I–20 can be further identified by the word SEVIS
Each SEVIS Form I–20 that is issued by a school to a student will contain a system-generated identification number. This number is referred to as the SEVIS ID number. The SEVIS ID number will remain the same as long as the student maintains his or her valid, original nonimmigrant status. This number will remain the same regardless of any changes or updates made by the DSO to the student's record.
When a student is inspected for admission, he or she will show the SEVIS Form I–20 to the inspecting officer. Once SEVIS is fully operational, the inspecting officer will record the number for transition to SEVIS. The inspector will then return the student's copy to the student with the appropriate entry stamp. The officer will have not to forward a copy on to the Service's data processing center for data entry, as the information will already be transmitted to SEVIS.
SEVIS will decrease the potential for the fraudulent misuse of the SEVIS Form I–20. Prior to issuance of a student visa to a prospective student, it is not uncommon for an alien to have been accepted at more than one school, and therefore to have been issued a Form I–20 from each of those schools offering acceptance. However, a student can obtain an F–1 or M–1 student visa, and be admitted to the United States, under only one Form I–20. The alien must present one Form I–20 to the consular officer, reflecting the student's decision as to which school to attend.
To help avoid the risk of having the remaining Forms I–20 fall into the hands of someone who might use them fraudulently, SEVIS will be able to track the issuance of multiple SEVIS Forms I–20 based upon numerous data elements in order to link the multiple forms to the same individual. SEVIS will then cancel the other SEVIS Forms I–20 issued by other schools with respect to the same individual once the student uses one of the forms to obtain student status.
As an additional deterrent to misuse, once a Form I–20 is used to a prospective student for initial eligibility, the DSO may not modify the Form I–20 until the DSO updates SEVIS to verify that the student's registration has been completed. However, a DSO may cancel or terminate a Form I–20 at any time. Furthermore, the Form I–20 is issued for a specific program start date. SEVIS will automatically terminate any Form I–20 that has not been used as the basis for issuance of a student visa, or for change of status to F or M status, by the program start date.
While on-line and distance education programs can be highly innovative means to augment or even conduct an educational program, the entry of a foreign student into the United States becomes unnecessary if the bulk of the program does not require the student's physical presence. Therefore, this rule proposes to limit the enrollment of F–1 and M–1 students in courses that are on-line or through distance education programs and do not require the student's actual presence. The rule also provides a definition of on-line courses and distance education programs that is similar to the definition provided by the Department of Education for telecommunications courses.
Under proposed § 214.2(f)(6)(i)(F), those students for whom on-line or distance education credits can be counted toward the obligation to maintain a full course of study will be limited to counting one class or three credits per semester toward the obligation, provided that the class is accepted for credit at the school that the student is currently attending. No on-line or distance education classes taken by an M–1 student, or by an F–1 student in a language program or elementary or secondary school program, can be counted as being part of the student's full course of study, given the limited duration or focus of those programs.
This rule proposes to limit the amount of time during which an F–1 or M–1 student who is authorized to drop below a full course of study because of illness or medical condition, the current requirement is only that the student resume a full course of study when he or she recovers. Such an open-ended standard can invite abuse.
Therefore, this proposed rule allows a DSO to authorize an F–1 student, who is currently in status, to drop below a full course of study only for the periods of time set forth in proposed § 214.2(f)(6)(iii) and (M)(6)(vi). Except for students experiencing illness or other medical condition, the DSO cannot authorize an F–1 student to drop below a full course of study for more than one semester or term (excluding a summer session). A DSO may not authorize a reduced course load for an M–1 student for more than 5 months. In any event, a DSO may not authorize a student, other than one experiencing illness or other medical condition, to completely withdraw from all classes; the student's reduced course load must include at least some classes in order for the DSO to grant authorization.
A student who is unable to resume a full course of study within the allowable time period will not be able to continue that status and will either have to leave the United States or apply for a change of nonimmigrant status to a more appropriate category.
This rule will create an interim reporting requirement for non-SEVIS schools to report to the Service for cases in which the DSO has authorized an F–1 or M–1 student to drop below a full course of study. Within 21 days of the authorization, the DSO must send to the STSC a photocopy of the student's Form I–20 with Form I–538, indicating the reason for the drop to STSC. DSOs are further required to report to the STSC not more than 21 days after the student has resumed his or her full course of study with Form I–20, reflecting the new program completion date, if applicable, and Form I–538 certifying that the student has resumed a full course of study.
For schools enrolled in SEVIS, this rule requires the electronic updating of SEVIS whenever a student is authorized to drop below a full course of study or has resumed a full course of study. A DSO must immediately update SEVIS when a student has been authorized to drop below a full course of study with the current date, the start date of the next term or session, and the reason for the authorization. The DSO must also update SEVIS within 21 days of the student's re-commencement of a full course of study in accordance with the new registration reporting requirement of 8 CFR 214.3(g)(3). If an extension is necessary, the DSO must also use SEVIS to update the SEVIS Form I–20 with the new completion date.
This rule makes clear that, prior to issuance of any Form I–20, the DSO at the school to which the student is transferring is responsible for determining that the student has been maintaining status at his or her previous school and is eligible for transfer to the new school. This includes cases in which the student graduates from one
The student must notify his or her current school of the intent to transfer and indicate the school to which he or she intends to transfer. Upon notification by the student, the current school's DSO will update the student as a “transfer out” to the intended new school in SEVIS. The DSO will indicate in SEVIS a release date, which would usually be the current semester or session completion date, or the date of expected transfer if earlier than the established academic cycle. The current school will retain access to and will remain responsible for the student in SEVIS until the release date. The student must then notify the school to which the student intends to transfer of the student's intent to enroll in the transfer school. Upon reaching the release date, the new school will be granted full access to the student's SEVIS record and may then issue a new SEVIS Form I–20, becoming responsible for that student's record. The current school conveys authority and responsibility over that student to the new school, and will no longer have full SEVIS access to that student's record. The new school may not issue a new SEVIS Form I–20 until after the release date, thus managing the issuance of multiple SEVIS Form I–20 within the United States. The student is then required to report his or her presence to the new school within 15 days of the program start date indicated on SEVIS Form I–20, so that the DSO at the transfer school can acknowledge the student's attendance, obtain the student's current address, and confirm that the student has completed the transfer process. The transfer is effected when the transfer school notifies SEVIS, within 30 days, in accordance with 8 CFR 214.3(g)(3)(iii), that the student has enrolled in classes.
This rule proposes to amend the current regulations in several ways:
• An M–1 student must be currently in status in order to apply for a transfer;
• The M–1 student must file Form I–539, Application to Change/Extend Nonimmigrant Status, with the Service Center having jurisdiction over the school he or she is currently authorized to attend;
• The date of approval of an M–1 transfer will be determined as of the program start date listed on the Form I–20, rather than the date of filing the application; and
• An M–1 transfer student will be allowed to enroll in classes at the transfer school at the next available term or session.
This rule proposes a process for the electronic update of SEVIS for the transfer of an M–1 student that is generally similar to the process for F–1 student transfer. The process differs, however, because the Service must approve all M–1 student transfers, based on the recommendation of the DSO.
After the transfer school issues a SEVIS Form I–20 to the student, the M–1 student must then submit Form I–539 to the Service Center with jurisdiction over the school which the student is currently authorized to attend. Upon submission to the Service of the application for transfer, the student may enroll in the transfer school at the next available term or session, but must notify the transfer school within 15 days of beginning attendance so that the school can obtain the necessary information for its records. The transfer school will then update SEVIS to indicate that the student has enrolled in classes in accordance with the new reporting requirement.
Once SEVIS is fully operational and interfaced with INS' CLAIMS 3 benefit processing system, the Service officer will transmit to SEVIS the approval of the transfer and endorse the name of the school to which transfer is authorized on the student's SEVIS Form I–20 and return it to the student. As a transitional process until that time, the student is required to notify the DSO at the transfer school of Service's decision within 15 days of the receipt of the adjudication by the Service. Upon notification by the student, the DSO must immediately update the student's record in SEVIS to reflect the proper decision of the Service Center. If approved, the DSO will update SEVIS to indicate the approval and print an updated SEVIS Form I–20 for the student indicating that the transfer has been completed. If denied, the DSO shall terminate the student's status in SEVIS indicating the transfer denial as the termination reason.
Finally, the Service notes that current § 214.2(m)(6), (7), and (8) relate to students who converted form F–1 status to M–1 status, prior to June 1, 1982, and are therefore no longer applicable to any current M–1 student. Accordingly, this rule proposes to remove these provisions as well as the reference to the school code suffix in § 214.2(m).
This rule proposes to clarify several issues with regard to practical training. First, this rule clarifies that practical training is available to F–1 students who were involved in a study abroad program during their course of study at an approved school. Although part of the alien's study in such a case was conducted outside the United States, these students remain enrolled at their school and have earned credits toward their degree. The Service believes that the time spent abroad, after the student has begun attendance at the school, should count towards the 9 consecutive months required to apply for practical training under 8 CFR 214.2(f)(10).
The rule also proposes to amend § 214.2(f)(10) to clarify that an F–1 student may be authorized for up to 12 months of practical training for each program level that he or she undertakes. For example, a student who has engaged in 12 months of practical training during study for an undergraduate degree becomes eligible for another 12 months of practical training when he or she changes to a higher educational level, such as a master's degree.
Under this rule, the DSO will recommend the student for optional practical training in SEVIS and print the SEVIS Form I–20 with the recommendation to be sent to the appropriate Service Center in conjunction with a completed Form I–765. A DSO using SEVIS will no longer need to submit a copy of Form I–538 to STSC in cases where optional practical training is recommended, since the SEVIS update will accomplish the necessary notification.
This rule also proposes to amend the period of time in which an F–1 may apply for optional practical training. Under the current rules, an F–1 student must apply for post-completion optional practical training no later than 60 days after completion of their full course of study, with the training to be completed within 14 months following completion of study. The requirement that the training be completed in a 14-month period often is problematic for students who wait to apply for optional practical training until close to the end of the 60-day period, since they must then wait for receipt of the Form I–766, Employment Authorization Document (EAD), before they can begin work. This process often results in the student not being able to receive the full 12 months of training.
The current rules also provide, in some cases, that an F–1 student may receive an extra 60 days of authorized stay in the United States. For example, a student can wait to apply for optional practical training until the 60th day after completion of studies, and, at the end of the training period, the student is entitled to a second period of 60 days to prepare to depart the United States. This rule proposes to amend § 214.2(f)(10)(ii) to require that F–1 students must apply for optional practical training prior to completion of all course requirements or completion of studies, thereby allowing only one 60-day period for departure. The students have only a limited period of time after the program end date in which to complete their training, and cannot begin the training until they have received an EAD from the Service Center. The student must apply before the program end date to ensure that the student will have received his or her EAD in time to commence optional practical training immediately after completion of study. This requirement will ensure that the students can continue to pursue the purpose for which they were admitted, without a gap, for the entire amount of time for which they are eligible.
Similarly, this rule will require that an M–1 student must apply for practical training prior to the completion date of his or her program. However, the request cannot be made more than 90 days prior to the program completion date shown on the Form I–20.
Finally, this rule provides that authorization to engage in practical training is terminated when the student changes to another educational level. The current regulations provide for automatic termination of such authorization for an F–1 or M–1 student only when the student transfers schools.
This rule proposes to amend § 214.2(f)(9)(iii) to specify that an F–1 student who has been offered employment by a recognized international organization submit must apply for employment authorization to the Service Center having jurisdiction over his or her place of residence, rather than applying in person at a local Service office. Also, to make this provision consistent with the other practical training processes, the requirement for DSO endorsement of the Form I–20 ID within the last 30 days is being removed.
This rule also deletes obsolete references in § 214.2(f)(9)(ii) for filing a wage-and-labor attestation with the Department of Labor for off-campus employment, since the pilot program sunset on September 30, 1996. Under the current rules, F–1 students seeking off-campus employment (other than an internship with an international organization as discussed above) must satisfy the requirements for demonstrating severe economic hardship caused by unforeseen circumstsances beyond the student's control.
This proposed rule amends the existing regulations to state explicitly the requirement that an F–1 or M–1 student must currently be in lawful status at an approved school in order to apply for an extension of status. A student who is no longer in current status—for example, a student who has dropped out of the school during a current term without authorization, or who remains in the United States after completion of his or her educational program—would not be eligible for an extension of status (although, in some limited circumstances, the student may be eligible for reinstatemennt of status, as discussed below).
Under SEVIS, the DSO will update SEVIS any time the DSO grants an extension for an F–1 nonimmigrant, and will then enter the new program end date. The DSO will then print the new SEVIS Form I–20 for the F–1 nonimmigrant reflecting the new program end date. SEVIS will eliminate the need for the DSO to submit Form I–538 to STSC.
Unlike extensions of status for F–1 students of status for M–1 students are adjudicated by the Service based on the recommendation of the DSO. This rule also provides for the electronic updating of SEVIS in the event of an M–1 program extension request and requires the DSO to update SEVIS to recommend that a student be approved for extensions. The SEVIS Form I–20 must be printed with the recommendation and new program end date for submission by mail to the Service Center, with Forms I–94 and I–539. Once the Service grants an extension the DSO will print out a new Form I–20 for the student.
First, the rule would eliminate the existing limitation that the student must file for an extension of status during the 30-day period prior to the program end date. Instead, an F–1 student would be allowed to apply for a program extension at any point prior to the program end date listed on the Form I–20.
Second, this rule would eliminate the provision in § 214.2(f)(7)(ii) which allows a DSO to add up to a one-year grace period in addition to the period of time the DSO estimates will be needed for each F–1 student to complete his or her program of study. Instead, the DSO will issue a Form I–20 to each F–1 student for the period of time reasonably necessary to complete the particular program of study. If additional time is needed, then the DSO will be able to authorize an extension of status through the regular process, which does not
Third, the rule will make clear that an F–1 student attending a public high school cannot apply for an extension with his or her DSO for continued attendance at his or her current school or to transfer to another public high school. Section 214(m) of the Act prohibits an F–1 student from attending a public high school for more than 12 months in the aggregate, and requires that the alien, prior to being issued the F–1 visa, demonstrate that he or she has reimbursed the local school district for the full, unsubsidized per capita cost of providing the education for the period of the alien's attendance. Because of the statutory limitation, an F–1 student at a public high school can only be admitted for an aggregate of 12 months of study and is not admitted for duration of status, as is the case for other F–1 students.
Fourth, the rule provides that such a public high school student
Finally, the Service proposes to place a limit on the extensions that may be granted to an M–1 student. There is currently no limit on the number of extensions for which an M–1 is eligible, nor a limit on the cumulative amount of time that can be granted under extensions.
This rule proposes to limit the cumulative time that extensions can be granted to an M–1 student to a period of 3 years from the Social Security student's original start date, plus 30 days. Thus, no extension could be granted to an M–1 student if he or she is unable to complete the course of study within 3 years of the original program start date, plus 30 days. This limit includes extensions that have been granted due to a drop below full course of study, a transfer of schools, or reinstatement.
Under the current rules, § 214.2(f)(15) and (m)(16), upon demonstrating eligibility for attendance at an approved school, and F–1 or M–1 student who is out of status may apply to the Service for reinstatement, with no specified limit on the length of time the student has remained in the United States out of status. A student can lose current student status in several ways, for example, by remaining in the United States beyond the authorized period after completion of his or her course of study, engaging in employment without authorization, or dropping out of school.
It is important that nonimmigrant students in the United States remain cognizant of their obligations to maintain their status. Past rules, designed to maintain flexibility for the academic community and to make allowance for the youth of some of the individuals in question, appear to have resulted in an atmosphere that could have led some to believe that they could violate their status with impunity. In fact, such violations can and do have serious consequences.
Accordingly, this rule proposes to amend the regulations to provide that an F–1 or M–1 student will not be eligible to apply for reinstatement unless he or she applies for reinstatement within five months of being out of status.
Moreover, the rule also proposes to limit the circumstances under which reinstatement is available. Unless the violation of status relates to a reduction in the student's course load that would have been within a DSO's power to authorize, and the student can demonstrate that failure to receive reinstatement would result in extreme hardship, the student must establish that the need for reinstatement resulted from circumstances beyond the student's control. Such circumstances may include circumstances such as serious injury or illness, closure of the institution, or a natural disaster. Circumstances beyond the student's control would NOT include cases where inadvertence, oversight, neglect, or a willful failure on the part of the student or the DSO resulted in the need for reinstatement.
The Service has drawn the general timeframe from § 214.2(f)(4), which allows an F–1 student who has been temporarily absent from the United States for no more than five months to be readmitted in F–1 status to continue his or her course of study. Of course, the situation of an alien who has violated his or her student status and remains in the United States is not the same as a student in lawful F–1 status who is temporarily absent from the United States. On the other hand, the Service recognizes that there may be reasons why a student may violate nonimmigrant student status without necessarily abandoning his or her educational plans.
Reinstatement of student status is distinct from processes for a current student to transfer from one school to another, or for an F–1 student to temporarily maintain a reduced course load, while remaining in status. Since transfers or reduced course loads will only be available for students who obtain approval from their school's DSO, the reinstatement rule will cover those students who have recently lost their student status but desire to continue their education (either at their prior school or another school) in the immediate future.
An F–1 or M–1 student who is ineligible for reinstatement cannot remain in the United States unless he or she has some other lawful immigration status. Such an alien would be free, if eligible to do so, to apply for a new nonimmigrant student visa at a consular office abroad to resume his or her studies in the United States. The Service wishes to emphasize the importance of complying with academic requirements and wishes to emphasize that reasons for reinstatement will be closely scrutinized. Reinstatement is intended to be a rare benefit for exceptional cases and is not intended to remedy situations within the student's control.
In the case of a student seeking reinstatement at a SEVIS school, the school that the student most recently attended will update the student's record in SEVIS and print out a new SEVIS Form I–20 which indicates that the student is requesting to be reinstated. The student should then submit the new SEVIS Form I–20 and Form I–539, by mail, to the district director. Once the request has been adjudicated, the student will receive his or her SEVIS Form I–20 with the decision of the district director. The district office will also update SEVIS to indicate the decision on the request for reinstatement. SEVIS will provide notification to the school of the reinstatement decision.
This rule also makes technical corrections in the regulations governing F–1 and M–1 reinstatement to reflect the redesignation of section 241 of the Act as section 237 of the Act.
Section 214(m) of the Act, as amended by sections 625 and 107(e)(2) of IIRIRA, Public Law 106–386, Div. C (Sept. 30, 1996), states that a nonimmigrant may not be accorded status as an F–1 student to pursue a course of study at a public elementary school or a publicly funded adult education program.
Accordingly, 8 CFR 214.3 is proposed to be amended to clarify that in no case will a public elementary school, a publicly funded adult education program, or a home school be approved for attendance by a nonimmigrant student. The proposed rule would also amend 8 CFR 214.2(f)(6) to make clear that an alien may not be admitted as an F–1 student to enroll in a course of study at a school or program that is not approved by the Service as provided in § 214.3.
Section 214(m) of the Act does not define “a publicly funded adult education program.” The proposed rule adopts a definition based on section 203(f) of the Adult Education and Family Literacy Act, Public Law 105–220, 20 U.S.C. 9202(l) Section 203(l) of Public Law 105–200 defines an adult education program as:
“services or instruction below the postsecondary level for individuals—
“(A) who have attained 16 years of age;
“(B) who are not enrolled or required to be enrolled in secondary school under State law; and
“(C) who—
“(i) lack sufficient mastery of basic educational skills to enable the individuals to function effectively in society;
“(ii) do not have a secondary school diploma or its recognized equivalent, and have not achieved an equivalent level of education; or
“(iii) are unable to speak, read, or write the English language.”
Under the proposed rule, an F–1 nonimmigrant may not enroll in such a program if the program is funded in whole or in part by a grant under the Adult Education and Family Literacy Act, or by any other Federal, State, county or municipal funding.
This rule proposes to remove the fee for the Form I–538, Certification by Designated School Official, from 8 CFR 103.7(b)(1). the Form I–538 is currently used by DSOs to notify the Service of updates to the student's record in the case of approved curricular practical training or extensions for F–1 students. The Form I–538 is also used in conjunction with applications for Form I–765, Employment Authorization Document (EAD). As the form is used simply for the purpose of certification by the DSO as to the current record of the student, a fee should not be required to accompany the form. Form I–538 will continue to be used until all schools enrolling foreign students are enrolled in SEVIS.
IIRIRA mandates collection of the current name and address of the students in the United States. Moreover, section 265(a) of the Act requires that all aliens who are subject to registration requirements (including all students and exchange aliens and their dependents who remain in the United States for 30 days or more) are required to provide a current name and address to the Attorney General within 10 days. The obligation to notify the Service of each change of address applies to all F, M or J nonimmigrants (indeed, all nonimmigrants other than those in A or G status) who remain in the United States for more than 30 days, regardless of whether their continue stay is pursuant to their initial admission or as a result of change or extension of status.
Although the change of address requirements are already set forth in 8 CFR 265.1, the Service is amending the rules relating to F, J, and M nonimmigrants regarding the relationship with SEVIS. This rule requires that each student must inform the Service and the DSO of any legal changes to his or her name or of any change of address, within 10 days of the change. The address provided by the student or dependent must be the actual physical location where the student or dependent resides. In no case may the address of the DSO at the school be used as the address of the student. Similar rules are provided for exchange alien to provide notice to the Service and the responsible officer at the exchange visitor program.
A student enrolled at a SEVIS school will satisfy the requirement of section 265(a) of the Act by providing a notice of a change of address within 10 days to the DSO. As with other changes the DSO is required to report under § 214.3(g)(3), the DSO must then update SEVIS to reflect the change in the student's or dependent's address within 21 days of notification by the student. For schools enrolled in SEVIS, the students will not need to provide a separate notice of change of address to the Service. Similarly, a J–1 exchange alien can satisfy the legal requirements by providing a change of address within 10 days to the responsible officer at an exchange visitor program that is enrolled in SEVIS.
An F, M, or J nonimmigrant enrolled at a non-SEVIS institution must submit Form AR–11, Alien's Change of Address Card, to the Service within 10 days of the change. Moreover, any nonimmigrant student or exchange alien, or a dependent, who fails to report a change of address within 10 days to the DSO or to the responsible officer, in the case of a J–1 nonimmigrant, is obligated to file Form AR–11 with the Service within 10 days.
The present Service regulations, § 214.2(f)(3) and (m)(3), suggest that an F–1 or M–1 student with a valid Form I–20, and his or her F–2 or M–2 dependents, may be admitted to the United States up to 60 days prior to the beginning of the course of study, as noted on the Form I–20. The rules governing J nonimmigrants do not specify a maximum period of advance admission.
The Service believes that a long period of admission, prior to the beginning of the approved course of studies or program for an F, J, or M nonimmigrant, and his or her dependents, is not consistent with the national interest, is not necessary to meet the needs of such aliens in coming to the United States, and is subject to abuse. However, some advance period is necessary so that the student or exchange alien has time to find a place to live and prepare for the studies or program ahead. Accordingly, this rule proposes to limit the period of advance admission to an “advance grace period” of 30 days.
This rule will clarify that an F–1 student's duration of status only includes an additional 60 days to depart the country when the F–1 student has completed his or her course of study or after completion of authorized practical training after completion of studies. The 60–day “grace period” does not apply to an F–1 student who does not complete
Similarly, the authorization for an M–1 or a J–1 to remain in the United States only includes an additional 30 days to depart the country when the M–1 or J–1 student has successfully completed his or her course of study or authorized practical training following completion of studies. The 30-day “grace period” does not apply to an M–1 student or J–1 exchange alien who does not complete his or her program, who fails to maintain a full course of study, or who falls out of status for any other reason.
Note that allowing a 60-day grace period for F–1 students, but only 30 days for M–1 students, is consistent with the current regulations at 8 CFR 214.2(f)(5)(i) and 214.2(m)(5). Allowing a longer grace period for F–1 students recognizes the fact that, in most cases, F–1 students remain in the United States longer than most M–1 students. A longer sojourn makes it reasonable to assume that F–1 students, generally, would need a longer period at the conclusion of their program to wind up their affairs and leave the United States in an orderly manner.
The Service notes that an existing law, section 222(g) of the Act, provides for the automatic voidance of a nonimmigrant visa at the conclusion of an authorized period of stay if the alien remains in the United States longer than the period of authorized admission. All F, J and M nonimmigrants should be aware of this provision of the law and are responsible for remaining in lawful nonimmigrant status while within the United States.
Any nonimmigrant admitted to the United States bears the burden of maintaining legal status during the period of admission that has been granted by the inspecting Service officer. The Service cannot emphasize enough the importance of maintaining lawful status while in the United States. See section 212(a)(9)(B) of the Act for more information on the important and far-reaching implications of unlawful presence and the impact that unlawful presence may have on an alien's future ability to reapply for a nonimmigrant visa, for admission to the United States, or for adjustment of status to that of a lawful permanent resident.
Under SEVIS, the DSO will enter all required dependent information in a record that is linked to the principal alien's. A dependent record can be created at the same time that the principal record is initially created, or as an update to an active principal's record.
Each dependent of an F–1 or M–1 nonimmigrant will receive his or her own SEVIS Form I–20, with a unique identification number, that specifies that they are a dependent. The information on the SEVIS Form I–20 relating to the dependent will be: the first and last name of the dependent, date and country of birth, and relationship to the student. The dependent SEVIS Form I–20 will also contain all of the information contained on the principal's SEVIS Form I–20 with the exception of the principal's unique SEVIS identification number. Additional information that will also be collected in SEVIS as part of the dependent record includes: the dependent's country of citizenship, gender and physical address, since this information can differ from the principal's. All active dependent records can be updated by the DSO to reflect changes in address or other dependent information.
Currently, there is no restriction on the classes or course of study that can be undertaken by the F–2 spouse and child. As such, an F–2 alien can take a full course of study at any school without the school having to meet any of the reporting requirements that are required for an F–1 nonimmigrant.
This rule proposes to prohibit full-time study by F–2 and M–2 spouses and to restrict such study by F–2 and M–2 children. The restriction is necessary to prevent an alien who should be properly classified as an F–1 student, and so subject to IIRIRA section 641 and other F–1 laws and regulations, from coming to the United States as an F–2 and, yet, attending school full time.
Under the proposed rule, an F–2 or M–2 spouse or child can enroll in avocational or recreational courses. If an F–2 or M–2 spouse, however, wants to enroll in a full course of study, the proposed rule would require the spouse to apply for and obtain a change of his or her nonimmigrant classification to that of an F–1, J–1, or M–1. Which classification is appropriate will depend upon the program the alien seeks to enroll in.
A similar rule would apply to F–2 or M–2 children. As noted, however, section 214(m) of the Act prohibits the enrollment of F–1 students in public elementary schools, and sets strict requirements on the enrollment of an F–1 student in a public high school.
The Service notes that section 101(a)(15)(f)(ii) of the Act permits an F–1 student to bring his or her children to the United States, and education is one of the chief tasks of childhood. It would be unreasonable to assume that Congress would intend that a bona fide F–1 student could bring his or her children to the United States, but not be able to provide for their education. Section 214(m) of the Act, moreover, only applies to F–1 status, and does not preclude an F–2 nonimmigrant's enrollment.
The proposed rule will, for this reason, allow the F–2 and M–2 child to be enrolled full-time in an elementary or secondary school (kindergarten through twelfth grade). An F–2 or M–2 child who wants to enroll in a full course of study, other than an elementary or secondary school, must change status to that of an F–1, J–1, or M–1 nonimmigrant, as appropriate based upon the child's educational program.
The Commissioner, in accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605(b)), has reviewed this regulation and, by approving it, certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Although some schools may be considered small entities, the use of SEVIS as a means for record keeping and reporting will streamline the processes currently in existence.
SEVIS uses technology already in place at most schools, and has been designed for use over the INTERNET. Institutions need only have access to a web-browser to gain access to the INTERNET and will not require any software to download. The Service will not charge a subscriber or user fee in order to use SEVIS. However, while there is no charge for access to SEVIS, there might be undetermined, individual, organizational costs to upgrade vendor software or campus information technology systems to use the batch-method interface with SEVIS.
The Service has taken this cost into account and has developed SEVIS to utilize common standards. As discussed above in the supplementary information, schools using SEVIS will no longer have to print out, file, and
The Service, however, welcomes comments related to the monetary impact of this electronic reporting process. In particular, schools are requested to comment on the costs they will incur to bring their existing equipment and systems into compliance with SEVIS and any resulting changes in personnel.
This rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, or $100 million or more in any one year, and it will not significantly or uniquely effect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
This rule is not a major rule as defined by section 804 of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Act of 1996. This rule will not result in an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more; a major increase in costs of prices; or significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or on the ability of United States-based companies to compete with foreign-based companies in domestic and export markets.
This rule is considered by the Department of Justice, Immigration and Naturalization Service, to be a “significant regulatory action” under Executive Order 12866, section 3(f), Regulatory Planning and Review. Accordingly, this regulation has been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review.
This rule will not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of Government. Therefore, in accordance with section 6 of Executive Order 13132, it is determined that this rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a federalism summary impact statement.
This rule meets the applicable standards set forth in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988.
The information required by this rule is considered an information collection and subject to review and clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act procedures. The Service is adding new electronic reporting requirements using SEVIS which is a new collection. Accordingly, the information collection requirements contained in this rule will be submitted to the Office of Management and Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act for review and approval.
Administrative practice and procedure, Authority delegations (Government agencies), Freedom of Information, Privacy, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Administrative practice and procedure, Aliens, Employment, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Students.
1. The authority citation for part 103 continues to read as follows:
5 U.S.C. 552, 552(a); 8 U.S.C. 1101, 1103, 1304, 1356; 31 U.S.C. 9701; E.O. 12356, 47 FR 14874, 15557; 3 CFR, 1982 Comp., p. 166; 8 CFR part 2.
2. Section 103.7(b)(1) is amended by removing the entry for “Form I–538” from the listing of fees.
3. The authority citation for part 214 continues to read as follows:
8 U.S.C. 1101, 1102, 1103, 1182, 1184, 1187, 1282; sec. 643, Pub. L. 104–208, 110 Stat. 3009–708; sect. 141 of the Compacts of Free Association with the Federated States of Micronesia and the Republic of the Marshall Islands, and with the Government of Palau, 48 U.S.C. 1901, note, and 1931 note, respectively; 8 CFR part 2.
4. Section 214.2 is amended by:
a. Removing “and” at the end of paragraph (f)(1)(i)(B), and by removing the period at the end of paragraph (f)(1)(i)(C) and adding in its place “; and”, and by adding a new paragraph (f)(1)(i)(D);
b. Adding new paragraphs (f)(1)(iii) and (iv);
c. Revising the term “sixty days,” in paragraph (f)(3) to read “30 days,”;
d. Revising paragraph (f)(5)(i);
e. Removing and reserving paragraph (f)(5)(iv).
f. Revising paragraph (f)(6)(i) introductory text and paragraph (f)(6)(i)(E);
g. Adding new paragraphs (f)(6)(i)(G) and (H);
h. Revising paragraph (f)(6)(iii), and by adding a new paragraph (f)(6)(iv);
i. Revising paragraphs (f)(7) and (f)(8)(ii);
j. Removing and reserving paragraphs (f)(9)(ii)(B) and (E), and;
k. Revising paragraphs (f)(9)(ii)(D)(
l. Revising paragraph (f)(10) introductory text;
m. Revising the last two sentences of paragraph (f)(10)(i) introductory text, and by revising paragraphs (f)(10)(i)(A) and (B);
n. Revising paragraph (f)(10)(ii)(A) introductory text, and paragraph (f)(10)(ii)(A)(
o. Removing paragraph (f)(10)(ii)(A)(
p. Revising the heading for paragraph (f)(10)(ii)(B);
q. Revising the heading for paragraph (f)(10)(ii)(D)
r. Adding a new paragraph (f)(10)(ii)(E);
s. Revising paragraph (f)(11)(ii);
t. Revising paragraphs (f)(15) and (f)(16); and by
u. Adding a new paragraph (f)(17).
The additions and revisions read as follows:
(f) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) * * *
(D) In the case of a student who intends to study at a public secondary school, the student has demonstrated
(iii)
(iv)
(5) * * *
(i)
(iv) [Reserved]
(6) * * *
(i)
(E) Study in a curriculum at an approved elementary school or academic high school which is certified by a designated school official to consist of class attendance for not less than the minimum number of hours a week prescribed by the school for normal progress toward graduation.
(G) For F–1 students enrolled in classes for credit or classroom hours, no more than the equivalent of one class or three credits per session, term, semester, trimester, or quarter may be counted if taken on-line or through distance education in a course that does not require the student's physical attendance for classes, examination or other purposes integral to completion of the class. An on-line or distance education course is a course that is offered principally through the use of television audio, or computer transmission including open broadcast, closed circuit, cable, microwave, or satellite, audio conferencing or computer conferencing. If the F–1 student's course of study is in a language study program, or elementary or secondary school, no on-line or distance education classes may be considered to count toward classroom hours or credit.
(H) On-campus employment pursuant to the terms of a scholarship, fellowship, or assistantship is deemed to be part of the academic program of a student otherwise taking a full course of study.
(iii)
(A)
(B)
(C)
(D)
(E)
(iv)
(7)
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
(8) ***
(ii)
(A)
(B)
(C)
(D)
(9) * * *
(ii) * * *
(B) [Reserved]
(D) * * *
(
(E) [Reserved]
(F) * * *
(
(iii)
(10)
(i) * * * A request for authorization for curricular practical training must be made to the DSO. A student may begin curricular practical training only after receiving his or her I–20 ID with the DSO endorsement.
(A)
(B)
(ii) * * *
(A)
(
(
(
(
(B)
(D)
(E)
(11) * * *
(ii) A DSO's recommendation for optional practical training on Form I–20 ID, or, for a SEVIS school, on an updated SEVIS Form I–20.
(15)
(i)
(ii)
(B) An F–2 spouse or F–2 child desiring to engage in full time study, other than that allowed for a child in paragraph (f)(15)(ii)(A) of this section, must apply for and obtain a change of nonimmigrant classification to F–1, J–1, or M–1 status.
(C) An F–2 spouse or F–2 child violates his or her nonimmigrant status by engaging in full time study except as provided in paragraph (f)(15)(ii)(A) or (B) of this section.
(16)
(i)
(A) Has not been out of status for more than 5 months;
(B) Establishes to the satisfaction of the Service, by a detailed showing, either that:
(
(
(C) Is currently pursuing, or intending to pursue, a full course of study in the immediate future at the school which issued the Form I–20 A–B;
(D) Has not engaged in unauthorized employment; and
(E) Is not deportable on any ground other than section 237(a)(1)(B) or (C)(i) of the Act.
(ii)
(17)
5. Section 214.2 is further amended by revising paragraph (j)(1)(ii), and adding new paragraphs (j)(1)(vii), (j)(1)(viii), and (j)(1)(ix) to read as follows:
(j) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii)
(vii)
(viii)
(ix)
6. Section 214.2 is further amended by:
a. Adding new paragraphs (m)(l)(iii) and (m)(l)(iv);
b. Revising the term “sixty days,” in paragraph (m)(3) to read “30 days,”
c. Revising paragraph (m)(5);
d. Removing and reserving paragraphs (m)(6), (m)(7), and (m)(8);
e. Adding new paragraphs (m)(9)(v) and (vi);
f. Revising paragraphs (m)(10), (m)(11)(ii), and (m)(14)(ii) introductory text;
g. Adding a new paragraph (m)(14)(vi);
h. Revising paragraphs (m)(16) and (m)(17); and by
i. Adding new paragraph (m)(18).
The additions and revisions read as follows:
(m) * * *
(l) * * *
(iii)
(iv)
(5)
(6) [Reserved]
(7) [Reserved]
(8) [Reserved]
(9) * * *
(v)
(vi)
(A)
(B)
(10)
(i)
(A) He or she is a bona fide nonimmigrant currently maintaining student status;
(B) Compelling educational or medical reasons have resulted in a delay to his or her course of study. Delays caused by academic probation or suspension are not acceptable reasons for program extension; and
(C) He or she is able to, and in good faith intends to, continue to maintain that status for the period for which the extension is granted.
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
(11) * * *
(ii)
(A)
(B)
(C) Once SEVIS is fully operational and interfaced with INS' CLAIMS 3 benefit processing system, the Service officer will transmit the approval of the transfer of SEVIS and endorse the name of the school to which transfer is authorized on the student's SEVIS Form I–20 and return it to the student. As part of the transitional process until that time, the student is required to notify the DSO at the transfer school of the decision of the Service within 15 days of the receipt of the adjudication by the Service. Upon notification by the student of the approval of the Service, the DSO must immediately update SEVIS to show that approval of the transfer has been granted. The DSO must then print an updated SEVIS From I–20 for the student indicating that the transfer has been completed. If the application for transfer is denied, the student is out of status and the DSO must terminate the student's record in SEVIS.
(14) * * *
(ii)
(vi)
(16)
(i)
(A) Has not been out of status for more than 5 months;
(B) Establishes to the satisfaction of the Service, by a detailed showing, either that:
(
(
(C) Is currently pursuing or intends to pursue, a full course of study at the school which issued the Form I–20A–B or SEVIS Form I–20;
(D) Has not engaged in unlawful employment; and
(E) Is not deportable on any ground other than section 237(a)(1)(B), (C)(i) of the Act.
(ii)
(17)
(i) The M–2 spouse of an M–1 student may not engage in full time study, and the M–2 child may only engage in full time study if the study is in an elementary or secondary school (kindergarten through twelfth grade). The spouse and child may engage in study that is avocational or recreational in nature.
(ii) An M–2 spouse or M–2 child desiring to engage in full time study, other than that allowed for a child in paragraph (m)(17)(i) of this section, must apply for and obtain a change of nonimmigrant classification to F–1, J–1, or M–1 status.
(iii) An M–2 spouse or M–2 child violates his or her nonimmigrant status by engaging in full time study except as provided in paragraph (m)(17)(i) and (ii) of this section.
(18)
7. Section 214.3 is amended by:
a. Redesignating paragraph (a)(2) as paragraph (a)(3);
b. Adding a new paragraph (a)(2);
c. Revising newly redesignated paragraph (a)(3)(i)(F);
d. Adding in newly redesignated paragraph (a)(3), a new paragraph (a)(3)(v);
e. Adding a new paragraph (e)(3);
f. Revising paragraphs (g)(1)(iv) and (g)(1)(v);
g. Adding a new paragraph (g)(3);
h. Revising paragraph (
i. Adding three sentences to the end of paragraph (
j. Revising the heading in paragraph (
k. Adding a new paragraph (
The additions and revisions read as follows:
(a) * * *
(2)
(3) * * *
(i) * * *
(F) A private elementary school.
(v) The following may not be approved for attendance by foreign students:
(A) A home school,
(B) A public elementary school, or
(C) An adult education program, as defined by section 203(l) of the Adult Education and Family Literacy Act, Public Law 105–220, as amended, 20 U.S.C. 9202(l), if the adult education program is funded in whole or in part by a grant under the Adult Education and Family Literacy Act, or by any other Federal, State, county or municipal funding.
(e) * * *
(3)
(g) * * *
(1) * * *
(iv) Current address where the student and any dependents physically reside (not a P.O. Box or an office address).
(v) The student's current academic status.
(3)
(i) Within 21 days of a change in any of the information contained in paragraph (e)(3) of this section, schools using the SEVIS system must update SEVIS with the current information.
(ii) Schools are also required to report within 21 days of the occurrence the following events:
(A) Any student who has failed to maintain status or complete his or her program;
(B) A change of the student or dependent's legal name or U.S. address;
(C) Any student who has graduated early or prior to the program end date listed on SEVIS Form I–20;
(D) Any disciplinary action taken by the school against the student as a result of the student being convicted of a crime; and
(E) Any other notification request made by SEVIS to the DSO with regard to the current status of the student.
(iii) Each term or session and no later than 30 days after the deadline for registering for classes, schools are required to report the following registration information:
(A) Whether the student has enrolled at the school, dropped below a full course of study without prior authorization by the DSO, or failed to enroll;
(B) The current address of each enrolled student; and
(C) The start date of the student's next session, term, semester, trimester, or quarter.
(l) * * *
(1) Meaning of term
(i)
(ii)
(2) * * * An approved school must update SEVIS upon any changes to the persons who are principal or designated officials, and furnish the name and title of the new official within 21 days of the change. Any changes to the PDSO, DSO or ASO must be made by the PDSO. In its discretion the Service may reject the submission of any individual as a DSO or withdraw a previous submission by a school of an individual.
(3)
(4)