Office of the Secretary, Department of Defense.
Final rule.
The Department of Defense is publishing this final rule to clarify TRICARE coverage for diabetic education. This rule introduces new definitions and addresses revisions or
Joy Saly, Medical Benefits and Reimbursement Branch, TRICARE Management Activity, telephone (303) 676–3742. Questions regarding payment of specific claims should be addressed to the appropriate TRICARE contractor.
This final rule introduces new definitions and addresses revisions or omissions in policy or procedure inadvertently missed in previous regulatory changes pertaining to diabetic education.
Diabetes self-management training (DSMT) is an interactive, collaborative process involving beneficiaries with diabetes, their physician(s), and their educators. The educational process should provide the beneficiary with the knowledge and skills needed to perform self-care, manage crises, and make lifestyle changes required to manage the diabetes successfully.
TRICARE had previously classified DSMT as a counseling service that was not medically necessary. Since all services provided under the TRICARE program must be medically necessary and appropriate, DSMT was excluded from coverage. In developing the TRICARE policy on self-management, however, it was determined that diabetes educational services are consistent with the medically necessary and appropriate provision and it was decided to conform with Medicare's policy on DSMT. As such, TRICARE removed “diabetic self-management training” programs as an excluded benefit effective July 1, 1998. Although the policy change conflicted with existing regulation language, TRICARE determined to move forward with the policy change because TRICARE was expanding and not restricting a benefit, and the change was in line with Medicare's benefit. This final rule corrects the failure to amend the language of the regulation and brings the regulation into conformance with the current policy.
Section 199.4(d)(3)(ix) Diabetic self-management training (DSMT) is added as a benefit under other covered services and supplies. This addition brings the regulation into conformance with the current policy.
Section 199.4(g)(39) is revised to remove diabetic self-education programs as an exclusion.
Section 199.6(c)(3)(iii)(L) adds Nutritionist to the list of individual professional providers of medical care authorized to provide services to CHAMPUS beneficiaries.
Section 199.6(c)(3)(iii)(M) adds Registered Dietitian to the list of individual professional providers of medical care authorized to provide services to CHAMPUS beneficiaries.
A proposed rule (74 FR 44798–44800) was published on August 31, 2009, and provided a 60-day comment period. No comments were received.
Section 801 of Title 5, United States Code (U.S.C.), and Executive Order (E.O.) 12866, require certain regulatory assessments and procedures for any major rule or significant regulatory action, defined as one that would result in an annual effect of $100 million or more on the national economy or which would have other substantial impacts. It has been certified that this rule is not a significant regulatory action.
Public Law (Pub. L.) 96–354, “Regulatory Flexibility Act” (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601), requires that each Federal agency prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis when the agency issues a regulation which would have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. This final rule will not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. Therefore, this final rule is not subject to the requirements of the RFA.
This rule does not contain a “collection of information” requirement, and will not impose additional information collection requirements on the public under Pub. L. 96–511, “Paperwork Reduction Act” (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
Section 202 of Public Law 104–4, “Unfunded Mandates Reform Act,” requires that an analysis be performed to determine whether any Federal mandate may result in the expenditure by State, local and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100 million in any one year. It has been certified that this final rule does not contain a Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by State, local and tribal governments, in aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more in any one year, and thus, this final rule is not subject to this requirement.
E.O. 13132, “Federalism,” requires that an impact analysis be performed to determine whether the rule has federalism implications that would have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of Government. It has been certified that this final rule does not have federalism implications, as set forth in E.O. 13132.
Claims, Dental health, Health care, Health insurance, Individuals with disabilities, Military personnel.
5 U.S.C. 301; 10 U.S.C. Chapter 55.
(d) * * *
(3) * * *
(ix)
Coverage limitations on the provision of this benefit will be as determined by the Director, TRICARE Management Activity, or designee.
(g) * * *
(39)
(c) * * *
(3) * * *
(iii) * * *
(L)
(M)