Skip to Content
Notice

Consumer-Directed Promotion; Public Meeting

Action

Notice Of Public Meeting; Request For Comments.

Summary

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing a public meeting on consumer-directed promotion of prescription drugs. The purpose of the meeting is to enable the agency and other persons and organizations to present the results of their research on consumer-directed promotion of prescription drug products through print, broadcast, and other types of media. FDA is particularly interested in hearing about research by other persons and organizations that provides insight into the effects that consumer-directed promotion has on the public health. The agency is also interested in research on the groups most affected by consumer-directed promotion, including patients, caretakers, physicians, physician assistants, nurses, pharmacists, managed care organizations, and insurers.

 

Table of Contents Back to Top

Date and Time: The public meeting will be held on September 22, 2003, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., and on September 23, 2003, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Presenters must send final electronic presentations in Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Word, or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) to FDA by close of business on September 10, 2003.

Persons interested in presenting research should send requests and abstracts in writing to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, rm. 1061, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rockville MD, 20852, by close of business on August 29, 2003.

Location: The public hearing will be held at the National Transportation Safety Board Boardroom and Conference Center, 429 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 20594. (Phone: 202-314-6421; Metro: L'Enfant Plaza station on the green, yellow, blue, and orange lines). See: http://ntsb.gov/events/newlocation.htm. (FDA has verified the Web site address, but FDA is not responsible for any subsequent changes to the Web site after this document publishes in the Federal Register.)

Registration and Requests for Presentation: No registration is required to attend the meeting. Seating will be on a first-come, first-served basis. If you wish to present research during the public meeting, please submit your request and an abstract of your presentation to the Division of Dockets Management (see Date and Time). Requests should be identified with the docket number listed in the heading of this document. Transcripts of the meeting will be available for review at the Division of Dockets Management.

For Information Regarding This Notice: Rose Cunningham, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (HFD-006), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-594-5468, e-mail: cunninghamr@cder.fda.gov. If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please inform the contact person.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Back to Top

I. Background Back to Top

Part of FDA's Division of Drug Marketing, Advertising and Communication's (DDMAC) mission is to protect public health by helping to ensure that prescription drug promotion directed to professionals and consumers is truthful, contains balanced risk and benefit information, and is accurately communicated. Increased spending on consumer-directed (also called direct to consumer promotion or DTC promotion) promotion, particularly broadcast advertisements, has stimulated public debate about its value or harm to the public. Proponents argue that DTC promotion is of educational value, will improve the physician-patient relationship, will make consumers aware of conditions they have that could benefit from treatment, would potentially improve health care, and could lower long-term health care costs through early recognition and treatment. Opponents contend that: Consumers do not have the expertise to accurately evaluate and comprehend prescription drug advertising, DTC promotion is typically misleading because it fails to adequately communicate risk information, DTC promotion will damage the physician-patient relationship, it will increase drug prices, lead to over-medication and drug abuse, and it will lead to use of the most costly alternatives. FDA needs to consider all points of view in the public debate.

In the Federal Register of August 12, 1997 (62 FR 43171), FDA announced the availability of a draft guidance for industry concerning DTC broadcast advertisements. The draft guidance was intended to describe how advertisers could fulfill their obligations under the regulations to provide consumers with necessary risk information in connection with prescription-drug advertisements broadcast, through general public media such as radio, television, and telephone communications systems. The prescription drug advertising regulations under part 202.1 (21 CFR 202.1) distinguish between print and broadcast advertisements. In addition to presenting a fair balance between information relating to side effects and contraindications and information relating to the effectiveness of the drug, print advertisements must include a “brief summary,” that generally includes all risks cited in the product's approved package labeling. In contrast, advertisements broadcast through media such as television, radio, or telephone communications systems must disclose the product's major risks in either the audio or audio and visual parts of the presentation (this is sometimes called the “major statement”); but need not provide the brief summary, as this would generally be impractical in broadcast or telephone media. Instead these advertisements may make “adequate provision * * * for dissemination of the approved or permitted package labeling in connection with the broadcast presentation” (§ 202.1(e)(1)). The draft guidance described, and explained the rationale behind, one possible multifaceted approach that would fulfill the “adequate provision” requirement.

After considering comments received from the public, the agency revised the draft guidance and published it as a final guidance on August 9, 1999 (64 FR 43197). FDA noted that although the comments did not address the specific issue of telephone advertisements, the lack of a specific discussion concerning such advertisements may have led to the assumption that the same multifaceted approach for television and radio advertisements was also appropriate for telephone advertisements. Therefore, in the final guidance, FDA clarified its position with regard to fulfilling the “adequate provision” requirement for telephone advertisements. Aside from this clarification and the revision of introductory language to reinforce the importance in broadcast advertisements of complying with the more general requirements of the advertising regulations, there were no major revisions to the draft guidance. The final guidance and a document entitled “Consumer-Directed Broadcast Advertisements Guidance: Questions and Answers” is available on FDA's Web site at www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/index.htm.

The agency said in the August 9, 1999, Federal Register notice announcing availability of the final guidance, that the agency intended to evaluate the effects of the guidance and DTC promotion, in general, on the public health. FDA said it would determine whether this guidance should be withdrawn, continued, or modified to reflect the agency's current thinking. The public meeting being announced in this document is one component of the approach the agency is taking to fulfill its commitment to this evaluation.

Another component is the research FDA has conducted on DTC promotion, including surveys of consumers in 1999 and 2002, as well as a survey of physicians in 2002 that explored how DTC promotion affects the patient-physician relationship. FDA intends to present the results of those findings at the public meeting.

II. Scope of the Meeting Back to Top

In light of the many complex public health issues raised by DTC prescription drug promotion, the agency stated, in previous Federal Register notices that it needed rigorous studies to assess the actual effects of DTC promotion and to help guide future policy. The agency is soliciting feedback on the results of such research for presentation at this public meeting. The meeting will give parties who have conducted rigorous research an opportunity to present their findings to FDA and the public. The agency will consider its own research and the research of others to explore whether, and, if so, how, the agency's current regulatory approach should be modified, including whether the guidance on DTC broadcast advertisements should be withdrawn, continued, or modified to reflect the agency's current thinking.

FDA is interested in research related to the promotion and advertising of prescription drugs, both DTC advertising and the interaction of DTC and health care professional-oriented promotion. The research may be either broadly defined or specific, and narrowly focused, but it must meet accepted standards for rigorous research. Specific topics of interest include, but are not limited to, the following:

1. What is known about the effects of DTC promotion on patient and physician behavior, and what effects, if any, does DTC promotion have on public health? What measurements should be used as indicators of the influence of DTC promotion, and which are most important?

2. Drugs ads used in DTC promotion include full-product advertisements, which include risk and benefit information, and shorter “reminder” ads. These shorter advertisements do not provide contextual and risk information. In what ways do consumers differ in their processing of full product advertisements and drug promotions, such as reminder ads, that do not provide contextual and risk information?

3. Does DTC promotion oversimplify the safety and effectiveness of prescription drugs? If so, what effect does such oversimplification have on public health? Specifically, what effect does it have on consumer understanding of and use of prescription drugs?

4. What impact does DTC promotion have on how patients interact with their health care professionals? Does this interaction affect health care providers' prescribing decisions?

5. Can consumers understand and accurately assess claims regarding the efficacy of prescription drugs? Can consumers understand and accurately assess claims regarding the safety of prescription drugs? Do consumers understand the qualifiers in efficacy and safety claims that represent distinctions about the degree of scientific uncertainty and causality associated with a claim, such as “may cause,” “risk factors include,” “individual results may vary,” and other similar qualifiers? Given the fact that prescription drug use requires participation of a learned intermediary, how important is imperfect understanding?

6. What kind of additional information, if any, should be required in the presentation of comparative drug claims to help consumers understand and critically evaluate them? What kind of additional information, if any, should be required in the presentation of comparative cost claims? Should this information vary if prescription drugs are compared to other prescription drugs, over-the counter drugs, or other types of treatments?

7. Current regulations require inclusion of a “brief summary” of prescribing information (side effects, contraindications, and effectiveness) in print advertisements. Does this form of disclosure effectively communicate to consumers? Is it informative? Should there be alternate requirements for risk disclosure, and, if so, what should they be? Current regulations require that broadcast advertisements present a “brief summary” of prescribing information unless adequate provision is made for the dissemination of the approved product labeling. Also required is a statement of the major risks of the product. Are these disclosure requirements effective and informative for consumers? Are there alternate types of risk disclosures that would be more effective or informative? If so, what are the strengths and limitations of these alternative types of risk disclosures?

8. The agency issued final guidance in 1999 on how pharmaceutical companies could meet the regulatory requirements to disseminate approved labeling for a prescription product in lieu of a scrolling “brief summary” in broadcast advertisements. Are consumers making use of this method for obtaining brief summary information? What, if any, factors hinder effective use of this information, especially among consumer segments most needing it, such as those with limited knowledge of the brand and medical condition?

9. New technologies have spurred the growth of computer-based promotional vehicles, such as the Internet, electronic bulletin boards, and kiosks in pharmacies. These promotions are neither purely print nor broadcast. What kind and format of information is necessary to ensure that these vehicles appropriately communicate risks and benefits of the product.

10. ”Infomercials” are program-length television or radio programs that promote prescription drugs to consumers. How well do consumers understand the sponsorship of consumer-oriented “information” promotions that differ in character from traditional promotion formats (15-, 30-, and 60-second ads)? How well do consumers understand the difference between benefit and risk claims based upon anecdotal evidence, such as a series of testimonials and product claims based upon scientific evidence?

11. To help ensure that advertisements contain “fair balance,” FDA currently requests disclosure of key risk and/or limitations of efficacy information, i.e., critical messages, in DTC prescription drug promotion. In general, are such disclosures effective and informative for this audience? What kinds of information should be disclosed?

12. Promotional materials that are disseminated directly by or on behalf of a pharmaceutical company (promotional labeling) are required to include the approved product labeling instead of a brief summary. How do consumers use product labeling, whether it is written for professionals or patients, and how does consumer use of labeling compare to consumer use of the brief summary?

13. Some manufacturer-supported DTC promotion appears to be sponsored by independent, third-party services, such as mailings from, or Web sites posted by, disease-specific foundations or disease management support services. What kind of disclosures would help consumers understand the source of the communication?

14. What additional research is needed to examine the effect of DTC advertising on public health and other DTC advertising issues? Is there research that the agency should conduct, and if so, what should be the focus of that research?

FDA is planning this public meeting to present the findings of its surveys and to hear the results of DTC research conducted by individuals, associations, organizations, academia, and companies. The objective of the meeting is for FDA to gather information to help the agency explore whether, and, if so, how, the agency's current regulatory approach to DTC prescription drug promotion should be modified. The agency believes presentations of research results will be the best format. Therefore, the 2-day meeting will be conducted as a series of presentations. First, FDA will present the findings of its surveys, then others who have been scheduled will present their findings. A panel of FDA officials will listen to each presenter and ask questions. The audience will then have an opportunity to ask questions and provide comments on the research.

To ensure timely handling, the outer envelope should be clearly marked with the docket number listed in the heading in this document, along with the statement “DTC Meeting.” Groups should submit two copies. The request to participate should contain the following information:

  • Presenter's name;
  • Address;
  • Telephone number;
  • E-mail address;
  • Affiliation, if any;
  • Abstract of the presentation;
  • Approximate amount of time requested for the presentation.

The agency requests that persons who have collaborated on relevant research coordinate their comments and present them through a single representative. FDA will allocate the time available for the meeting among the persons who request to present research as described in this section II. Due to limited time, the agency will accept only one presenter from each company or organization. FDA reserves the right to turn down requests if the proposal is not research on an appropriate topic or is primarily qualitative. After reviewing the requests to present and the abstracts, the agency will schedule each appearance and notify each participant by e-mail or telephone of the time allotted to the person and the approximate time the person's presentation is scheduled to begin. Presenters must send final electronic presentations in Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Word, or PDF to FDA by close of business on September 10, 2003. Failure to meet the deadline will result in the presenter forfeiting his or her presentation slot.

The meeting schedule will be available both on the Internet at http://www.fda.gov/cder/ddmac/DTCmeeting2003.html and at the meeting. After the meeting, the schedule and presentations will be placed on file in the Division of Dockets Management under the docket number listed in the heading in the this document.

III. Comments Back to Top

Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852, written or electronic comments on or before December 1, 2003. You must submit two copies of comments, identified with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document. Submit electronic comments by December 1, 2003, to http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/oc/dockets/comments/commentdocket.cfm or fdadockets@oc.fda.gov. You should annotate and organize your comments to identify the specific questions to which they refer. Comments to the docket can be reviewed in the Division of Dockets Management, Monday through Friday between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.

IV. Transcripts Back to Top

You can request a copy of the transcript of the meeting in writing from the Freedom of Information Office (HFI-35), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, rm. 12A-16, Rockville, MD 20857, approximately 30 working days after the meeting, at a cost of 10 cents per page or on a compact disk at a cost of $14.25 each. You can also examine the transcript Monday through Friday between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m. in the Division of Dockets Management.

Dated: August 7, 2003.

Jeffrey Shuren,

Assistant Commissioner for Policy.

[FR Doc. 03-20522 Filed 8-7-03; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S

Site Feedback