Medicare Program; State Health Insurance Assistance Program (SHIP)
This rule adopts as final the provisions in the interim final regulation that published June 1, 2000, which explain the terms and conditions that apply to State grants for counseling and assistance to Medicare beneficiaries, and makes several minor technical clarifications.
Table of Contents Back to Top
- FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
- SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
- I. Background
- A. Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990
- B. BBA and MMA
- II. Provisions of the Interim Final Regulation
- III. Analysis of and Responses to Public Comments
- IV. Provisions of the Final Regulations
- V. Collection of Information Requirements
- VI. Regulatory Impact Statement
- List of Subjects in 42 CFR Part 403
- PART 403—SPECIAL PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS
DATES: Back to Top
These regulations are effective June 26, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Back to Top
Eric Lang, 410-786-3199.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Back to Top
I. Background Back to Top
A. Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990
Section 4360 of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990 (OBRA '90), 101, as amended, requires us to make grants to States for health insurance advisory service programs for Medicare beneficiaries. (By regulation, we have defined the term “State” or “States” to include the 50 States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa.) Grants are available to provide information, counseling, and assistance relating to Medicare, Medicaid, Medicare supplemental policies, long-term care insurance, and other health insurance benefit information. This funding program is known as the State Health Insurance Assistance Program (SHIP).
For a detailed discussion of the regulatory background, please see the preamble section of the interim final rule with comment (65 FR 34983).
B. BBA and MMA
The preamble to the interim final regulation noted that amendments to the Social Security Act (the Act) provided an additional funding source for SHIP. On August 5, 1997, the Act was amended by the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (the BBA), which established a new Part C of the Medicare program, sections 1851 through 1859 of the Act. Part C was known at that time as the Medicare+Choice (M+C) program. The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (“Medicare Modernization Act,” or MMA) changed the name of Part C to the “Medicare Advantage program,” and added a new Part D of the Medicare program, section 1860D-1 through 1860D-42 of the Act, known as the Voluntary Prescription Drug Benefit Program.
Section 1851(d)(1) of the Act, “Providing information to promote informed choice,” requires us to provide for activities to broadly disseminate information to Medicare beneficiaries (and prospective Medicare beneficiaries) on available MA coverage options in order to promote an active, informed selection among these options. Section 1857(e)(2)(A) of the Act, “Cost-sharing in enrollment-related costs,” authorizes us to charge and collect an administration or user fee from MA organizations for the purpose of administering this information dissemination program.
Section 1860D-1(c) of the Act requires us to conduct similar activities to disseminate information about the Part D prescription drug benefit, in coordination with the activities under the Medicare Advantage program. Section 1860D-12(b)(3)(D) of the Act specifically incorporates section 1857(e)(2), giving us authority to charge user fees to sponsors of prescription drug plans under Part D.
Any amounts collected in accordance with section 1857(e)(2) of the Act are available for the purpose of carrying out section 1851 (relating to enrollment and dissemination of Medicare Advantage information), section 1860D-1(c) (Medicare prescription drug coverage), and section 4360 of OBRA '90 (SHIP).
II. Provisions of the Interim Final Regulation Back to Top
On June 1, 2000, we published an interim final rule with comment that amended our regulations at 42 CFR part 403 to provide for a two-tiered approach for making grants under SHIP. Section 403.504(a) was revised to provide that for aggregate annual expenditures of up to $10 million, grants would be made according to the existing procedures set forth in § 403.504. That is, each eligible State will receive a fixed as well as variable amount as set forth in § 403.504(b) and § 403.504(c) of that section. We stated that we plan to continue to fund this first tier of grants from our program management budget and through any congressional appropriations made for the purpose of implementing this program.
With respect to the second tier, the interim final rule provided that any grants that exceed a total of $10 million annually will be made at our discretion according to criteria that will be communicated to States through the grant solicitation process (see revised § 403.504(a)). For example, in prior periods, second tier grants have been based on criteria such as the number of managed care enrollees or the number of low-income beneficiaries in each State. We decided to notify States of the criteria for awarding the grants rather than publish specific criteria in our regulations to give us the flexibility required by the dynamic nature of the health care industry.
The original legislation that created the SHIP, section 4360 of OBRA '90, directed that beneficiaries be informed about their rights and options in regard to Medicare supplemental (Medigap) insurance. After that section was enacted, changes such as Medicare reform, the implementation of Part C of the Medicare Program (known at the time as the “Medicare+Choice” program and since renamed the “Medicare Advantage” program), and ongoing consolidation within the managed care industry had greatly increased beneficiaries' choices. This created a need for sources of accurate and unbiased information to allow beneficiaries to make informed choices. Greater choice for beneficiaries and specific statutory changes required SHIPs to modify, and in many instances expand, the size of their programs and the scope of services they provide.
The interim final rule revised § 403.502, Availability of grants, to clarify that we award grants to States subject to fund availability, and if applicable, subject to the satisfactory progress in the State's project during the preceding grant period.
We revised § 403.504(a) to specify that, for available grant funds, up to and including $10,000,000, grants will be apportioned to States according to the grant award process currently in place. In addition, we revised § 403.504(b) to highlight the availability of funds as a condition of award.
We revised § 403.508(a) to emphasize the fact that States receiving grants under this subpart must use the grant money in accordance with the terms and conditions specified in the notice of grant award.
III. Analysis of and Responses to Public Comments Back to Top
We received no public comments on the interim final rule. Therefore, we are adopting the provisions as final without change.
IV. Provisions of the Final Regulations Back to Top
This final rule incorporates all of the provisions of the interim final rule.
- We revised Secs. 403.502 and 403.504 to change “HCFA” to “CMS.”
V. Collection of Information Requirements Back to Top
This final rule does not impose any information collection and recordkeeping requirements that are subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
VI. Regulatory Impact Statement Back to Top
We have examined the impact of this rule as required by Executive Order 12866 (September 1993, Regulatory Planning and Review), the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (September 19, 1980, 96), section 1102(b) of the Social Security Act, the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4), and Executive Order 13132.
Executive Order 12866 directs agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). A regulatory impact analysis (RIA) must be prepared for major rules with economically significant effects ($100 million or more in any 1 year). This rule does not reach the economic threshold and thus is not considered a major rule.
The RFA requires agencies to analyze options for regulatory relief of small businesses. For purposes of the RFA, small entities include small businesses, nonprofit organizations, and small governmental jurisdictions. Most hospitals and most other providers and suppliers are small entities, either by nonprofit status or by having revenues of $6 million to $29 million in any 1 year. Individuals and States are not included in the definition of a small entity. We are not preparing an analysis for the RFA because we have determined that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
In addition, section 1102(b) of the Act requires us to prepare a regulatory impact analysis if a rule may have a significant impact on the operations of a substantial number of small rural hospitals. This analysis must conform to the provisions of section 604 of the RFA. For purposes of section 1102(b) of the Act, we define a small rural hospital as a hospital that is located outside of a Core-Based Statistical Area and has fewer than 100 beds. We are not preparing an analysis for section 1102(b) of the Act because we have determined that this rule will not have a significant impact on the operations of a substantial number of small rural hospitals.
Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 also requires that agencies assess anticipated costs and benefits before issuing any rule whose mandates require spending in any 1 year of $100 million in 1995 dollars, updated annually for inflation. That threshold level is currently approximately $120 million. This rule will have no consequential effect on State, local, or tribal governments or on the private sector.
Executive Order 13132 establishes certain requirements that an agency must meet when it promulgates a proposed rule (and subsequent final rule) that imposes substantial direct requirement costs on State and local governments, preempts State law, or otherwise has Federalism implications. Since this regulation does not impose any costs on State or local governments, the requirements of E.O. 13132 are not applicable.
In accordance with the provisions of Executive Order 12866, this regulation was reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Centers for Medicare Medicaid Services amends 42 CFR chapter IV as set forth below:
PART 403—SPECIAL PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS Back to Top
1.The authority citation for part 403 continues to read as follows:
2.Section 403.502 is revised to read as follows:
§ 403.502 Availability of grants.
CMS awards grants to States subject to availability of funds, and if applicable, subject to the satisfactory progress in the State's project during the preceding grant period. The criteria by which progress is evaluated and the performance standards for determining whether satisfactory progress has been made are specified in the terms and conditions included in the notice of grant award sent to each State. CMS advises each State as to when to make application, what to include in the application, and provides information as to the timing of the grant award and the duration of the grant award. CMS also provides an estimate of the amount of funds that may be available to the State.
3.Section 403.504 is amended by—
A. Revising paragraph (a); and
B. Revising paragraph (b) introductory text.
The revisions read as follows:
§ 403.504 Number and size of grants.
(a) General. For available grant funds, up to and including $10,000,000, grants will be made to States according to the terms and formula in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section. For any available grant funds in excess of $10,000,000, distribution of grants will be at the discretion of CMS, and will be made according to criteria that CMS will communicate to the States via grant solicitation. CMS will provide information to each State as to what must be included in the application for grant funds. CMS awards the following type of grants:
(1) New program grants.
(2) Existing program enhancement grants.
(b) Grant award. Subject to the availability of funds, each eligible State that submits an acceptable application receives a grant that includes a fixed amount (minimum funding level) and a variable amount.
* * * * *
4.Section 403.508(a) is revised to read as follows:
§ 403.508 Limitations.
(a) Use of grants. Except as specified in paragraph (b) of this section, and in the terms and conditions in the notice of grant award, a State that receives a grant under this subpart may use the grant for any reasonable expenses for planning, developing, implementing, and/or operating the program for which the grant is made as described in the solicitation for application for the grant.
* * * * *
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.773, Medicare—Hospital Insurance; and Program No. 93.774, Medicare—Supplementary Medical Insurance Program)
Dated: January 26, 2006.
Mark B. McClellan,
Administrator, Centers for Medicare Medicaid Services.
Approved: February 16, 2006.
Michael O. Leavitt,
[FR Doc. 06-4816 Filed 5-25-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P