Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
Notice of availability and receipt of application.
The Weyerhaeuser Venture Company has applied to the Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) for an incidental take permit pursuant to section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). The Service proposes to issue a 2-year permit to the Weyerhaeuser Venture Company that would authorize take of the threatened valley elderberry longhorn beetle (Desmocerus californicus dimorphus) incidental to otherwise lawful activities. Such take would occur as a result of development on the Tributary Point Parcel 9 Project area in Sacramento County, California. Development would result in the loss of up to 2 elderberry plants with 6 stems that provide habitat for the valley elderberry longhorn beetle. Start Printed Page 10538
We request comments from the public on the permit application, which is available for review. The application includes a Habitat Conservation Plan (Plan). The Plan describes the proposed project and the measures that the Weyerhaeuser Venture Company would undertake to minimize and mitigate take of the valley elderberry longhorn beetle.
We also request comments on our preliminary determination that the Plan qualifies as a “low-effect” Habitat Conservation Plan, eligible for a categorical exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act. The basis for this determination is discussed in an Environmental Action Statement, which is also available for public review.
Written comments should be received on or before March 29, 2000.
Send written comments to Mr. Wayne White, Field Supervisor, Fish and Wildlife Service, 2800 Cottage Way, Suite W-2605, Sacramento, California 95825-1846. Comments may be sent by facsimile to 916-414-6714.Start Further Info
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ms. Vicki Campbell, Chief of Conservation Planning Division, at the above address or call (916) 414-6600.End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information
Availability of Documents
Please contact the above office if you would like copies of the application, Plan, and Environmental Action Statement. Documents also will be available for review by appointment, during normal business hours at the above address.
Section 9 of the Act and Federal regulation prohibit the “take” of fish or wildlife species listed as endangered or threatened, respectively. Take of listed fish or wildlife is defined under the Act to include kill, harm, or harass. The Service may, under limited circumstances, issue permits to authorize incidental take; i.e., take that is incidental to, and not the purpose of, the carrying out of an otherwise lawful activity. Regulations governing incidental take permits for threatened and endangered species are found in 50 CFR 17.32 and 17.22, respectively.
The proposed project area is Parcel 9 of the Tributary Point development, which corresponds to an unsectioned portion of Township 9 North, Range 7 East of the “Folsom, California” topographic quadrangle (United States Geological Survey, Photorevised 1980). The Tributary Point Parcel 9 development is located west of Hazel Avenue, south of Folsom South Canal, and north of U.S. Highway 50 in the unincorporated area of Rancho Cordova in Sacramento County, California.
Weyerhaeuser Venture Company, the owner of Parcel 9, is requesting an incidental take permit to authorize take for 2 years.
Parcel 9 is a 1.39-acre vacant lot which has been graded and supports utilities. The entire Tributary Point development consists of 14 improved lots. The applicant has sold all but two lots, and construction of retail, residential and office uses has occurred on eight lots. Current uses include a 216-unit apartment village, a 70,000 square foot, 3-story office building, 2 furniture stores, 2 fast-food restaurants and 2 gas station/convenience marts. Two additional lots have been sold to an extended stay hotel operator. A furniture store operator has expressed interest in Parcel 9.
Two elderberry shrubs, containing six stems greater than 1 inch in diameter at ground level, occur on the project site within the impact area as potential habitat for the federally-threatened valley elderberry longhorn beetle. The project site does not contain any other rare, threatened, or endangered species or habitat. No critical habitat for any listed species occurs on the project site. Construction of the proposed project would result in the removal of the two elderberry shrubs on site. No beetle exit holes were found in these two shrubs.
Under the Plan, mitigation for impacts to the valley elderberry longhorn beetle would conform to the Service's 1999 Mitigation Guidelines. The two elderberry shrubs affected by the proposed project would be transplanted to the Conservation Resources Laguna Creek Mitigation Bank, a Service-approved mitigation site, prior to or on March 31, 2000. Typically, a 1:1 ratio would be required as mitigation if transplantation occurs by February 15th, but because transplantation would occur past this deadline, a 2:1 ratio (or 12 elderberry plants to mitigate for impacts to six stems) is required. To fully comply with the Service's mitigation guidelines for the transplantation of elderberry shrubs past the typical February 15th deadline, the applicant has purchased 3 valley elderberry longhorn beetle mitigation units at the Laguna Creek Mitigation Bank. Purchase of these units will result in the planting of 15 elderberry plants to mitigate for impacts to six stems. The purchase of these mitigation units has been consummated with an agreement for sale of valley elderberry longhorn beetle units dated February 9, 2000, between Weyerhaeuser Venture Company and Conservation Resources, LLC.
The Proposed Action consists of the issuance of an incidental take permit and implementation of the Plan, which includes measures to minimize and mitigate impacts of the project on the valley elderberry longhorn beetle. Two alternatives to the Proposed Action were considered in the Plan. Under the No Action Alternative, no permit would be issued. However, the No Action Alternative is inconsistent with local development goals and would result in the undisturbed elderberry shrubs being left on the site in an isolated patch of open space with little habitat value. Another alternative would result in the development of another site instead of the described project site. The proposed project is an infill project and has minor or negligible environmental effects. The development of the present site is considered more desirable than the construction of the project on an open site in a less-developed area because the use of an alternative site may result in greater environmental effects.
The Service has made a preliminary determination that the Plan qualifies as a “low-effect” plan as defined by its Habitat Conservation Planning Handbook (November 1996). Determination of low-effect for a habitat conservation plan is based on the following three criteria: (1) implementation of the Plan would result in minor or negligible effects on federally listed, proposed, and candidate species and their habitats; (2) implementation of the Plan would result in minor or negligible effects on other environmental values or resources; and (3) impacts of the Plan, considered together with the impacts of other past, present and reasonably foreseeable similarly situated projects would not result, over time, in cumulative effects to environmental values or resources which would be considered significant. As more fully explained in the Service's Environmental Action Statement, the Tributary Point Parcel 9 Project Plan qualifies as a “low-effect” plan for the following reasons:
1. Approval of the Plan would result in minor or negligible effects on the valley elderberry longhorn beetle and its habitat. The Service does not anticipate significant direct or cumulative effects to the valley elderberry longhorn beetle resulting from development of the Parcel 9 Project area.
2. Approval of the Plan would not have adverse effects on unique geographic, historic or cultural sites, or involve unique or unknown environmental risks.
3. Approval of the Plan would not result in any cumulative or growth inducing impacts and, therefore, would Start Printed Page 10539not result in significant adverse effects on public health or safety.
4. The project does not require compliance with Executive Order 11988 (Floodplain Management), Executive Order 11990 (Protection of Wetlands), or the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, nor does it threaten to violate a Federal, State, local or tribal law or requirement imposed for the protection of the environment.
5. Approval of the Plan would not establish a precedent for future action or represent a decision in principle about future actions with potentially significant environmental effects.
The Service therefore has preliminarily determined that approval of the Plan qualifies as a categorical exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act, as provided by the Department of the Interior Manual (516 DM 2, Appendix 1 and 516 DM 6, Appendix 1). Based upon this preliminary determination, we do not intend to prepare further National Environmental Policy Act documentation. The Service will consider public comments in making its final determination on whether to prepare such additional documentation.
The Service provides this notice pursuant to section 10(c) of the Act. We will evaluate the permit application, the Plan, and comments submitted thereon to determine whether the application meets the requirements of section 10 (a) of the Act. If the requirements are met, the Service will issue a permit to the Weyerhaeuser Venture Company for the incidental take of the valley elderberry longhorn beetle from development of the Parcel 9 Project area. We will make the final permit decision no sooner than 30 days from the date of this notice.Start Signature
Dated: February 18, 2000.
Elizabeth H. Stevens,
Deputy Manager, California/Nevada Operations Office, Sacramento, California.
[FR Doc. 00-4564 Filed 2-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P