Skip to Content


Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection: Comment Request

Document Details

Information about this document as published in the Federal Register.

Published Document

This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.

Start Preamble


Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), formerly known as the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR), HHS.




This notice announces the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) intention to request the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to allow a proposed information collection project: “Development and Implementation of National guideline Clearinghouse (NGC) Evaluation”. In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public law 104-13 (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)), AHRQ invites the public to comment on this proposed information collection.

This proposed information collection was previously published in the Federal Register on February 25, 2000 and allowed 60 days for public comment. No public comments were received.

The purpose of this notice is to allow an additional 30 days for public comment.


Comments on this notice must be received by June 5, 2000.


Written comments should be submitted to the OMB Desk Officer at following address: Allison Eydt, Human Resources and Housing Branch, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, New Executive Office Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503.

Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized and included in the request for OMB approval of the proposed information collection. All comments will become a matter of public record.

In accordance with the above cited legislation, comments on the AHRQ information collection proposal are requested with regard to any of the following: (a) whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of functions of the Agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Agency's estimate of the burden (including hours and costs) of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology.

Copies of the proposed collection plans, data collection instruments, and specific details on the estimated burden can be obtained from the AHRQ Reports Clearance Officer.

Start Further Info


Cynthia D. McMichael, AHRQ Reports Clearance Officer, (301) 594-3132.Start Printed Page 25927

End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information


Proposed Project

Development and Implementation of National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC) Evaluation

The NGC already reaches many individuals indicating its great potential to affect medical practice. In the nine months since it became available to the public, the NGC site has processed over 5 million requests guideline information with an average user visit lasting seven minutes. Over the last six months, the “hit volume” (e.g. connection to the Internet site) has been fairly constant with approximately 36,000 per day. The majority of users are within the United States, but the site is also utilized globally, indicating the potential for far reaching effects.

AS the NGC audience continues to grow and the field of best practices develops, the Web site will only be effective if it keeps pace with the needs of its users. A small study conducted by the American Medical Association (AMA) to gauge NGC awareness and satisfaction with the site among their members provides the only data to date on how the NGC is currently perceived by users. Although its conclusions were limited by a small sample size of physician respondents (e.g., n=44), the AMA survey suggested that several functions of the NGC could be improved. These findings support the need for a further, more comprehensive evaluation of the site's quality and usefulness in order for AHRQ to meet users' needs and to promote implementation of guidelines by health care professionals. The results of this type of evaluation will assist AHRQ and others to understand what users want and need to utilize clinical guidelines in the provision of care. The timeliness and need for this evaluation effort are further underscored by the development of a customer satisfaction survey by the NGC Web site developer pursuant to its original contract in accordance with widely accepted management practices. This electronic survey is designed to capture NGC audience satisfaction with the interface and format of the Web site and will complement this proposed evaluation of the content, quality, and usefulness of information.

The NGC is intended to serve the needs of a diverse population of users. Not only are the user groups different, their expectations and uses of the NGC are unique. Moreover, no single sampling or data collection technique is sufficient to capture the needed information from these groups. A survey that attempted to capture the perspectives of all groups would be long, complicated, and burdensome.

Therefore, we propose using a three-tiered data collection scheme designed to get distinct types of information in a manner most useful to helping evaluate how well the Web site is serving its intended populations. The three proposed approaches are survey questionnaire, focus group discussions, and unstructured, informational discussions. Each will be applied to a subset of all users, as appropriate, to capture their unique needs and complement the overall data collection effort.

Data Confidentiality Provisions

Although no information on race, income, sexual behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, or other matters commonly considered private will be requested, the contractor responsible for conducting the study will perform in accordance with the requirements of the Privacy Act, 5 USC 552a, and the Agency's confidentiality statute, 42 USC 299c-3(c), to protect respondents' privacy and the confidentiality of data collected. All results will be reported without attributing responses to any individual source. Information gained for the purposes of this data collection will only be used for the purposes of this project.

Data Products

The evaluation goals will be achieved through three types of data collection: (1) Written survey questionnaires, (2) focus groups, and (3) discussions with individuals working in health care who contribute to guideline development and use. Assignments of data collection modes to target audience groups are designed to reach the maximum number of respondents and the broadest range of groups. Participation will be minimally burdensome and is voluntary. Both qualitative and quantitative data will be collected to characterize the experiences and needs of users in a manner most likely to facilitate improvement activities by AHRQ.

The project will benefit AHRQ, the medical community, policymakers, health service researchers, and ultimately patients in the following ways:

  • AHRQ will be able to monitor how their current format and content are serving their intended audiences;
  • AHRQ will be able to assess how the Clearinghouse is affecting future development of guidelines and their implementation in clinical practices;
  • AHRQ will be able to use the evaluation results to refine the site, thereby making it more useful for the medical community and other professionals who use guidelines in care management;
  • Individual clinicians will be better able to obtain timely guidance about the management of complex clinical problems;
  • Federal, State, and private purchasers will be better able to encourage contracted or prospective plans and providers to adopt clinical practices that are consistent with the best available standards of care; and
  • Public policy experts will be better able to obtain unbiased, evidence-based guidelines and information for decisionmaking and policy purposes.

Method of Collection

Electronic mail will be used to transmit the written survey responses. The written survey will be also be linked to the NGC Website. Users can complete the survey on-line, and their responses will be automatically submitted. By using e-mail and the Web link to target our audience, we are ensuring that our respondents are Web-based users. This approach significantly reduces the burden to non-Web users who would be unable to contribute information useful to this data collection. Additionally, this use of information technology minimizes the burden on the targeted respondents by improving the ease with which they can submit their survey responses.

Estimated Annual Respondent Burden

Annual number of respondentsEstimated time per respondent (hours)Estimated total annual burden hoursEstimated annual cost to the government
Start Printed Page 25928

The survey instrument is short and poses minimal burden on the time of respondents. Estimates of time required to complete the survey during the pilot phase range from 7 to 20 minutes. The annual hour burden calculation assumes each survey will last 15 minutes, therefore the total of annualized hourly costs to participants is estimated to be $30,040.

Start Signature

John M. Eisenbert,


End Signature End Supplemental Information

[FR Doc. 00-10983 Filed 5-3-00; 8:45 am]