Skip to Content


J&R Research Corp., et al.; Analysis To Aid Public Comment

Document Details

Information about this document as published in the Federal Register.

Published Document

This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.

Start Preamble


Federal Trade Commission.


Proposed consent agreement.


The consent agreement in this matter settles alleged violations of federal law prohibiting unfair or deceptive acts or practices or unfair methods of competition. The attached Analysis to Aid Public Comment describes both the allegations in the draft complaint that accomplishes the consent agreement and the terms of the consent order—embodied in the consent agreement—that would settle these allegations.


Comments must be received on or before July 12, 2000.


Comments should be directed to: FTC/Office of the Secretary, Room 159, 600 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20580.

Start Further Info


Matthew Gold or Linda Badger, Federal Trade Commission, 901 Market St., Suite 570, San Francisco, CA. 94103. (415) 356-5276 or 356-5275.

End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information


Pursuant to Section 6(f) of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 38 Stat. 721, 15 U.S.C. 46 and Section 2.34 of the Commission's Rules of Practice (16 CFR 2.34), notice Start Printed Page 31323is hereby given that the above-captioned consent agreement containing a consent order to cease and desist, having been filed with and accepted, subject to final approval, by the Commission, has been placed on the public record for a period of sixty (60) days. The following Analysis to Aid Public Comment describes the terms of the consent agreement, and the allegations in the complaint. An electronic copy of the full text of the consent agreement package can be obtained from the FTC Home Page (for May 11, 2000), on the World Wide Web, at “ /ftc/formal.htm.” A paper copy can be obtained from the FTC Public Reference Room, Room H-130, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20580, either in person or by calling (202) 326-3627.

Public comment is invited. Comments should be directed to: FTC/Office of the Secretary, Room 159, 600 Pennsylvania, Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20680. Two paper copies of each comment should be filed, and should be accompanied, if possible, by a 31/2 inch diskette containing an electronic copy of the comment. Such comments or views will be considered by the Commission and will be available for inspection and copying at its principal office in accordance with Section 4.9(b)(6)(ii) of the Commission's Rules of Practice (16 CFR 4.9(b)(6)(ii)).

Analysis of Proposed Consent Order To Aid Public Comment

The Federal Trade Commission has accepted an agreement, subject to final approval, to a proposed consent order from J & R Research, Inc., and its principal, Gerald G. McCarthy (“respondents”). Respondents were general partners in a distributorship of Kaire International, Inc., a multi-level marketing company. Respondents also created and marketed to Kaire distributors audio tapes and other promotional materials touting a Kaire product containing pycnogenol, a substance derived from the bark of the maritime pine tree.

The proposed consent order has been placed on the public record for sixty (60) days for the reception of comments by interested persons. Comments received during this period will become part of the public record. After sixty (60) days, the Commission will again review the agreement and any comments received and will decide whether it should withdraw from the agreement and take other appropriate action or make final the agreement's proposed order.

Respondents' advertisements claimed that pycnogenal could mitigate or cure the effects of numerous diseases or disorders. The proposed complaint alleges that respondents could not substantiate claims that pycnogenol: (1) Alleviates rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis and rheumatism; (2) reduces the amount of insulin needed to treat diabetes; (3) treats and/or improves health disorders associated with diabetes, including neuropathy, retinopathy, osteomyelitis, circulatory problems and heart problems; (4) helps treat lupus, Parkinson's Disease, multiple sclerosis and fibromyalgia; (5) treats or improves digestive disorders, including Crohnes Disease and irritable bowel syndrome; (6) helps prevent strokes and the reoccurrence of strokes; (7) dramatically improve physical disabilities caused by stroke; (8) dramatically helps prevent heart disease, inlcuding arterial sclerosis; (9) reduces blood pressure; (10) dramatically improves and helps prevent circulatory problems, including phlebitis, thrombophlebitis, blood clots, and varicose veins; (11) dramatically promotes the shrinkage of tumors and helps prevent tumor formation; (12) treats cancer and/or prolongs the life of cancer victims; (13) reduces or eliminates inflammation of the prostate; (14) eliminates or reduces the incidence of asthma attacks and symptoms caused by allergies; (15) improves eyesight and treats disorders of the retina; (16) helps rebuild joints and soft tissue; (17) greatly accelerates the healing time of injuries; (18) improves or cures skin conditions such as psoriasis and acne; (19) treats Attention Deficit Disorder and Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder; (20) reduces or eliminates the need for medication in individuals with Attention Deficit Disorder and Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder; and (21) is twenty times more protective as an antioxidant than Vitamin C, and fifty times more protective than Vitamin E.

The complaint further alleges that respondents falsely claimed that scientific research demonstrates that pycnogenol products can alleviate or cure many of these diseases or disorders. Finally, the complaint alleges that respondents could not substantiate its claim that testimonials from consumers appearing in the advertisements for pycnogenol products reflect the typical or ordinary experience of members of the public who use pycnogenol products.

Part I of the proposed consent order would require respondents, when advertising pycnogenol or any other food, drug, or dietary supplement, to possess competent and reliable scientific evidence before making any of the claims that were alleged as unsubstantiated in the complaint. Part II of the proposed order would require respondents to possess competent and reliable scientific evidence before making any claim regarding the benefits, performance, or efficacy of any food, drug, or dietary supplement. Part III of the proposed order would prevent respondents from misrepresenting the existence, contents, validity, results, conclusions, or interpretations of any test, study, or research in an advertisement for any product.

Part IV of the proposed order addresses claims made through endorsements or testimonials. Under Part IV, respondents may make such representations if they possess and rely upon competent and reliable evidence that substantiates the representations; or the respondents must disclose either what the generally expected results would be for users of the advertised products, or the limited applicability of the endorser's experience to what consumers may generally expect to achieve. The proposed order's treatment of testimonial claims is in accordance with the Commission's “Guides Concerning Use of the Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising,” 16 CFR 255.2(a).

Part V of the proposed order contains language permitting respondents to make drug claims that have been approved by the FDA pursuant to either a new drug application or a tentative final or final standard. Part VI states that respondents would be permitted to make claims that the FDA has approved pursuant to the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1990.

Part VII of the proposed order requires respondents to retain, and make available to the Commission upon request, all advertisements and promotional materials containing any representation covered by the order, as well as any material that it relied upon in disseminating the representation and any materials that contradict, qualify, or call into question the representation.

The remainder of the proposed order contains standard requirements that respondents distribute the order to relevant personnel, that the corporate respondent notify the Commission of any changes in corporate structure that might affect compliance with the order; that the individual respondent notify the Commission of changes in his employments status, and that respondents file one or more reports detailing their compliance with the order.

The purpose of this analysis is to facilitate public comment on the proposed order, and it is not intended to constitute an official interpretation of Start Printed Page 31324the agreement and proposed order, or to modify in any way their terms.

Start Signature

By direction of the Commission.

Donald S. Clark,


End Signature End Supplemental Information

[FR Doc. 00-12382 Filed 5-16-00; 8:45 am]