This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status. For complete information about, and access to, our official publications and services, go to About the Federal Register on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for legal research should verify their results against an official edition of the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
Notice of preliminary rescission of antidumping duty administrative review.
In response to a timely request from the petitioners, [1] on January 26, 2000, the Department of Commerce published a notice of initiation of an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain preserved mushrooms from Chile with respect to Nature's Farm Products (Chile) S.A. and Ravine Foods Inc. covering the period August 5, 1998, through November 30, 1999. See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews,65 FR 42280 (January 26, 2000). [2] The Department of Commerce is now preliminarily rescinding this review as a result of the absence of imports and entries into the United States of subject merchandise during the period of review.
May 26, 2000.
David J. Goldberger or Katherine Johnson, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4136 or (202) 482-4929, respectively.
Unless otherwise indicated, all citations to the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (“the Act”), are references to the provisions effective January 1, 1995, the effective date of the amendments made to the Act by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act. In addition, unless otherwise indicated, all citations to the Department of Commerce's regulations are to 19 CFR part 351 (1999).
On January 21, 2000, the Department (“the Department”) issued the antidumping questionnaire to Nature's Farm Products (Chile) S.A. (“NFP”) via its U.S. parent, Nature Farm Products, Inc., and Ravine Foods Inc. (“Ravine”), a Canadian company. On January 26, 2000, the Department published a notice of initiation of an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain preserved mushrooms from Chile with respect to NFP and Ravine (65 FR 4228). On February 28, 2000, Ravine advised the Department that the company did not export the subject merchandise to the United States during the period of review (“POR”).
To confirm the accuracy of Ravine's claim, the Department performed a customs query on entries of the subject merchandise exported from Chile and Canada. In so doing, the Department examined U.S. Customs import statistics, and found no imports of the subject merchandise by Ravine, NFP, or any other company from Chile to the United States during the period of review (“POR”). We also found no imports of the subject merchandise from Canada. Accordingly, there is no basis for applying facts available in this instance with regard to NFP, which did not respond to our questionnaire. See March 14, 2000, memorandum, “U.S. Customs Data on Imports of the Subject Merchandise,” from David J. Goldberger to Irene Darzenta Tzafolias. The petitioners did not comment on these findings.
The products covered by this review are certain preserved mushrooms whether imported whole, sliced, diced, or as stems and pieces. The preserved mushrooms covered under this review are the species Agaricus bisporus and Agaricus bitorquis. “Preserved mushrooms” refer to mushrooms that have been prepared or preserved by ( printed page 34148) cleaning, blanching, and sometimes slicing or cutting. These mushrooms are then packed and heated in containers including but not limited to cans or glass jars in a suitable liquid medium, including but not limited to water, brine, butter or butter sauce. Preserved mushrooms may be imported whole, sliced, diced, or as stems and pieces. Included within the scope of this review are “brined” mushrooms, which are presalted and packed in a heavy salt solution to provisionally preserve them for further processing.
Excluded from the scope of this review are the following: (1) All other species of mushroom, including straw mushrooms; (2) all fresh and chilled mushrooms, including “refrigerated” or “quick blanched mushrooms”; (3) dried mushrooms; (4) frozen mushrooms; and (5) “marinated,” “acidified” or “pickled” mushrooms, which are prepared or preserved by means of vinegar or acetic acid, but may contain oil or other additives.
The merchandise subject to this review is classifiable under subheadings 2003.1000.27, 2003.1000.31, 2003.1000.37, 2003.1000.43, 2003.1000.47, 2003.1000.53, and 0711.90.4000 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTS”). Although the HTS subheadings are provided for convenience and Customs purposes, our written description of the scope of this review is dispositive.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), the Department may rescind an administrative review, in whole or only with respect to a particular exporter or producer, if the Secretary concludes that, during the period covered by the review, there were no entries, exports, or sales of the subject merchandise. Since the evidence shows that there were no entries of certain preserved mushrooms made by any exporter or producer from Chile during the POR, we are preliminarily rescinding this review in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3). The cash-deposit rate for NFP and “All Other” producers/exporters of the subject merchandise will remain at 148.51 percent, the rate established in the most recent segment of this proceeding (63 FR 56613, October 22, 1998).
This notice is published in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Dated: May 19, 2000.
Richard W. Moreland,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
1. The petitioners are the Coalition for Fair Preserved Mushroom Trade which includes the American Mushroom Institute and the following domestic companies: L.K. Bowman, Inc., Nottingham, PA; Modern Mushrooms Farms, Inc., Toughkernamon, PA; Monterrey Mushrooms, Inc., Watsonville, CA; Mount Laurel Canning Corp., Temple, PA; Mushrooms Canning Company, Kennett Square, PA; Southwood Farms, Hockessin, DE; Sunny Dell Foods, Inc., Oxford, PA; United Canning Corp., North Lima, OH.
Back to Citation2. On December 14, 1999, the Department published a notice of “Opportunity To Request Administrative Review” which inadvertently omitted the antidumping duty order on preserved mushrooms from Chile. Therefore, on December 16, 1999, the Department informed interested parties that they could request an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain preserved mushrooms from Chile no later than January 3, 2000.
Back to Citation[FR Doc. 00-13319 Filed 3-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-M