Office of Personnel Management.
The Office of Personnel Management is adopting as final an interim increase in the cost-of-living allowance (COLA) rate for Honolulu. The increase was the result of our 1997 cost-of-living surveys in certain nonforeign areas. We are also making a change in the Miscellaneous Expense category we use in the COLA methodology that will identify education as an expense. This increase is a result of cost-of-living surveys conducted in the summer of 1997 using our current methodology for calculating COLA rates. A settlement agreement that is currently awaiting court approval calls for OPM to use a new methodology in conducting future surveys and in calculating future COLA rates. Therefore, the survey results reflected in this rule are not an indication of what survey results or COLA rates would be under the new methodology.
Effective date: August 16, 2000.Start Further Info
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Donald L. Paquin, (202) 606-2838; fax: (202) 606-4264; or email: COLA@opm.gov.End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information
The Federal Government pays cost-of-living allowances (COLAs) to General Schedule, U.S. Postal Service, and certain other Federal employees in Alaska, Hawaii, Guam and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) conducts cost-of-living surveys in each allowance area to determine whether, and to what degree, local living costs are higher than those in Washington, DC. OPM sets the COLA rate for each area based on the results of these surveys.
On October 21, 1998, we published an interim rule for comment in the Federal Register (63 FR 56430) that—
—Increased the COLA rate for the Honolulu allowance area from 22.5 percent to 25 percent based on the 1997 survey results, and
—Broadened the composition of the Miscellaneous Expense category used in the COLA methodology.
We received one comment on the interim regulations. The commenter felt that the change in the Miscellaneous Expense category should identify education as an expense. Alternatively, the commenter thought we should emphasize that other expenses are possible or describe the kinds of expenses that may be included in the category. We agree that adding education to the listing would be helpful, and we have changed the wording as suggested.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
I certify that this regulation will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because the regulation will affect only Federal agencies and employees.Start List of Subjects
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 591
- Government employees
- Travel and transportation expenses
Office of Personnel Management.
Janice R. Lachance,
PART 591—ALLOWANCES AND DIFFERENTIALS
Subpart B—Cost-of-Living Allowance and Post Differential—Nonforeign AreasEnd Part Start Amendment Part
1. The authority citation for subpart B of part 591 continues to read as follows:End Amendment Part Start Amendment Part
2. In § 591.205, paragraph (b)(4) is revised to read as follows:End Amendment Part
(b) * * *
(4) Miscellaneous expenses. Miscellaneous expenses, including expenses for health care, gifts, contributions, savings and investments, retirement, life insurance, and education, are estimated from consumer expenditure surveys and other data appropriate for Federal employees for each income level.
[FR Doc. 00-17569 Filed 7-14-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-01-P