On February 14, 2000, the American Stock Exchange LLC (“Exchange” or “Amex”), submitted to the Securities and exchange Commission (“Commission”), pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”)  and Rule 19b-4 thereunder, a proposed rule change amending the Amex Company Guide to adopt a peer review requirement for auditors of listed companies. The proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register on May 26, 2000. The Commission received one comment letter in favor of the proposal. This order approves the proposal.
II. Description of the Proposal
The Exchange proposes to amend the Amex Company Guide to require all independent public accountants auditing Exchange listed companies to have received an internal quality control review by an independent public accountant (“peer review”), or be enrolled in a peer review program that meets acceptable guidelines. According to the Exchange, acceptable guidelines would include comparability to AICPA standards included in the Standards for Performing on Peer Reviews, as codified in the AICPA's SEC Practice Section Reference Manual, and oversight of the peer review program by an independent body comparable to the organizational structure of the Public Oversight Board, as codified in the AICPA's SEC Practice Section Reference Manual. Further, the proposal would require copies of peer review reports, accompanied by any letters of comment and letters of Start Printed Page 48033response, to be maintained by the administering entity of the peer review program and be made available to the Exchange upon request. Similarly, working papers of the administering entity and the independent oversight body would also be required to be retained for 90 days after the report is filed, and be made available to the Exchange upon request.
In addition, the Exchange believes that auditors of listed companies should be subject to a practice monitoring program under which the auditor's quality control system is reviewed by an independent peer auditor on a periodic basis. Consequently, after the initial peer review required by proposed Section 605(a) of the Amex Company Guide, independent auditors of listed companies would be required to receive a peer review that meets the guidelines of proposed Section 605(b) every three years pursuant to AICPA guidelines.
The Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act  and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange, in that it is designed to facilitate securities transactions and to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market. The Commission believes that the proposed rule change will protect investors by improving the reliability and effectiveness of audit committees of companies listed on the Exchange and by helping to ensure that an auditing firm's quality control systems are subject to a level of review that satisfies standards established by the accounting industry. In addition, the Commission believes that by requiring auditors to receive a peer review on a periodic basis, the proposal will help to ensure that auditors will continue to have quality control systems in place and follow independently established policies, procedures, and auditing standards. Finally, by requiring the administering entity and the independent oversight body of the peer review program to retain peer review records and to allow the Exchange access to these records, the Commission believes that the proposed rule change will help enable the Exchange to enforce the peer review requirement.
It Is Therefore Ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, that the proposed rule change (SR-Amex-00-04) is approved.Start Signature
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority.
Margaret H. McFarland,
4. Letter from Ronald Walton, Chair, American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (“AICPA”) SEC Practice Section Peer Review Committee, to Jonathan G. Katz, Office of the Secretary, Commission, dated June 16, 2000. This commenter supported the proposed rule change.Back to Citation
5. The Exchange has noted that the Nasdaq Stock Market and certain banking agencies, such as the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, have implemented a peer review requirement.Back to Citation
6. The administering entity would be required to maintain the reports until the completion of the next peer review report. Telephone call between Sonia Patton, Attorney, Commission, and John Nachmann, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, The Nasdaq-Amex Market Group, on March 28, 2000.Back to Citation
7. Telephone call between Sonia Patton, Attorney, Commission, and John Nachmann, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, The Nasdaq-Amex Market Group, on March 28, 2000.Back to Citation
9. In approving this rule change, the Commission has considered the proposal's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation, consistent with Section 3 of the Act. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).Back to Citation
[FR Doc. 00-19735 Filed 8-3-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M