This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status. For complete information about, and access to, our official publications and services, go to About the Federal Register on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for legal research should verify their results against an official edition of the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
Notice is hereby given that, on May 9, 2000, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (“the Act”), Multi Protocol Label Switching Forum (“MPLS Forum”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the parties and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties are Advanced Internet Laboratory, Fairfax, VA; Agilent Technologies, West Lothian, Scotland, United Kingdom; Amber Networks, Santa Clara, CA; Bellsouth, Atlanta, GA; Charlotte's Web, Yokneam, Israel; Crescent Networks, Chelmsford, MA; Data Connection, Enfield, Middlesex, United Kingdom; Ennovate Networks, Inc., Boxborough, MA; GlobeSpan, Woodbridge, NJ; Gotham Networks, Acton, MA; Harris & Jeffries, Dedham, MA; Integral Access, Chelmsford, MA; Inverness Systems, Marlborough, MA; Jasmine Networks, San Jose, CA; Lucent Technologies, Westford, MA; Maple Networks, San Jose, CA; Marconi Communications, Warrendale, PA; Mayan Networks, Alameda, CA; Nokia Telecommunications, Burlington, MA; Orchestream, London, United Kingdom; Pluris, Cupertino, CA; Qwest Communications, Denver, CO; Riverstone Networks, Santa Clara, CA; Telcordia Technologies, Morristown, NJ; Tenor Networks, Acton, MA; Valiant Networks, San Jose, CA; and Vivace Networks, Oldsman, FL. The nature and objectives of the venture are to promote worldwide compatibility and interoperability between different implementations of MPLS. The MPLS Forum will also help users develop strategies and evaluation criteria for deploying MPLS in their networks.Start Signature
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 00-20310 Filed 8-10-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M