Maritime Administration, Transportation.
Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
The Maritime Administration (MARAD, we, our, or us) is proposing to update Part 205—Audit Appeals; Policy and Procedure. Part 205 establishes appeal procedures for parties who contract with the Maritime Subsidy Board or MARAD. We propose to: Update these audit procedures to reflect current MARAD practices; and rewrite the regulations in plain language. The intended effect of this rulemaking is to improve our audit appeals process by updating and clarifying part 205.
You should submit your comments early enough to ensure that Docket Management receives them not later than January 16, 2001.
Your comments should refer to docket number [MARAD 2000-8284]. You may submit your comments in writing to: Docket Clerk, U.S. DOT Dockets, Room PL-401, 400 7th St., SW, Washington, DC 20590. You may also submit them electronically via the internet at http://dmses.dot.gov/submit/. You may call Docket Management at (202) 366-9324 and visit the Docket Room from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m., EST., Monday through Friday, except Federal Holidays. An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at http://dms.dot.gov.Start Further Info
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Fred A. Slaugh, Office of Financial Approvals and Rates, (202) 366-5866. You may send mail to Mr. Slaugh at Maritime Administration, Office of Financial and Rate Approvals, Room 8117, 400 Seventh Street, SW, Washington, DC 20590.End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information
How Do I Prepare and Submit Comments?
Your comments must be written and in English. To ensure that your comments are correctly filed in the Docket, please include the docket number of this document in your comments. We encourage you to write your primary comments in a concise fashion. However, you may attach necessary additional documents to your comments. There is no limit on the length of the attachments. Please submit two copies of your comments, including the attachments, to Docket Management at the address given above under ADDRESSES.
How Can I be Sure That my Comments Were Received?
If you wish Docket Management to notify you upon its receipt of your comments, enclose a self-addressed, stamped postcard in the envelope containing your comments. Docket Management will return the postcard by mail.
How do I Submit Confidential Business Information?
If you wish to submit any information under a claim of confidentiality, you should submit three copies of your complete submission, including the information you claim to be confidential business information, to the Chief Counsel, Maritime Administration, at the address given above under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. You should mark “CONFIDENTIAL” on each page of the original document that you would like to keep confidential. In addition, you should submit two copies, from which you have deleted the Start Printed Page 69280claimed confidential business information, to Docket Management at the address given above under ADDRESSES. When you send comments containing information claimed to be confidential business information, you should include a cover letter setting forth with specificity the basis for any such claim.
Will the Agency Consider Late Comments?
We will consider all comments that Docket Management receives before the close of business on the comment closing date indicated above under DATES. To the extent possible, we will also consider comments that Docket Management receives after that date.
How Can I Read the Comments Submitted by Other People?
You may read the comments received by Docket Management at the address given above under ADDRESSES. The hours of the Docket Room are indicated above in the same location. You may also see the comments on the Internet. To read the comments on the Internet, take the following steps: Go to the Docket Management System (DMS) Web page of the Department of Transportation (http://dms.dot.gov/). On that page, click on “search.” On the next page (http://dms.dot.gov/search/), type in the four-digit docket number shown at the beginning of this document. The docket number for this document is [xxxx]. After typing the docket number, click on “search.” On the next page, which contains docket summary information for the docket you selected, click on the desired comments. You may download the comments. Please note that even after the comment closing date, we will continue to file relevant information in the Docket as it becomes available. Further, some people may submit late comments. Accordingly, we recommend that you periodically check the Docket for new material.
Part 205—Audit Appeals; Policy and Procedure establishes the policy and procedure for parties to use when seeking redress and appeals of decisions involving contracts with the Maritime Subsidy Board or MARAD. Part 205 applies to all MARAD contracts including the Operating-Differential Subsidy, Construction-Differential Subsidy, Capital Construction Fund, Construction Reserve Fund, and Maritime Security Program.
According to the policy in part 205, any contractor who disagrees with audit findings or decisions of MARAD and who does not reach a negotiation with the appropriate Coast Director's office may appeal. Any contractor who appeals must do so in writing to the Maritime Administrator within six (6) months following the date of the document notifying the contractor of the audit findings. MARAD will then notify the appellant in writing if a hearing or additional facts are necessary. After the Maritime Administrator renders a decision, MARAD will notify the appellant in writing. When a contract contains a disputes article, the disputes article will govern the bases for dispute and any appeals.
We are proposing revisions to part 205 that reflect our current practices of making audit appeals decisions. Appellants no longer appeal to the appropriate Coast Director's office. In the past, auditors were assigned to regional offices. However, we no longer have these auditors. MARAD headquarters is responsible for overseeing audits as deemed appropriate. Such audits may be performed by the Office of Inspector General.
Executive Order 12866 and the President’s memorandum on plain language in government writing of June 1, 1998, require each agency to write all rules in plain language. The Department of Transportation and MARAD are committed to plain language in government writing; therefore, we propose to revise part 205 using plain language to provide easier understanding. Our goal is to improve the clarity of the regulation. We invite your comments on how to make this proposed rule easier to understand.
Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
Executive Order 12866 and DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
We have reviewed this notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) under Executive Order 12866 and have determined that this is not a significant regulatory action. Additionally, this NPRM is not likely to result in an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more. The purpose of this NPRM is to propose updates to MARAD’s audit procedures to reflect current MARAD practices and to rewrite the regulations in plain language.
This NPRM is also not significant under the Regulatory Policies and Procedures of the Department of Transportation (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979). The costs and benefits associated with this rulemaking are considered to be so minimal that no further analysis is necessary. Because the economic impact, if any, should be minimal, further regulatory evaluation is not necessary.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This NPRM will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This NPRM only updates procedures for appealing audit findings and decisions to the Maritime Administrator. Although the number of small entities who appeal audit findings may be substantial, the cost of filing an audit appeal with MARAD is minimal, if any. Therefore, I certify that this NPRM will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
We have analyzed this final rule in accordance with the principles and criteria contained in E.O. 13132 (“Federalism”) and have determined that it does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a federalism summary impact statement. These regulations have no substantial effects on the States, or on the current Federal-State relationship, or on the current distribution of power and responsibilities among the various local officials. Therefore, consultation with State and local officials was not necessary.
Environmental Impact Statement
We have analyzed this NPRM for purposes of compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and have concluded that under the categorical exclusions provision in section 4.05 of Maritime Administrative Order (“MAO”) 600-1, “Procedures for Considering Environmental Impacts,” 50 FR 11606 (March 22, 1985), the preparation of an Environmental Assessment, and an Environmental Impact Statement, or a Finding of No Significant Impact for this NPRM is not required. This NPRM involves administrative and procedural regulations that have no environmental impact.
MARAD does not believe that this NPRM will significantly or uniquely affect the communities of Indian tribal governments when analyzed under the principles and criteria contained in Executive Order 13084 (“Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments”). Therefore, the funding and consultation requirements of this Executive Order would not apply. Start Printed Page 69281
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This NPRM does not impose an unfunded mandate under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995. It does not result in costs of $100 million or more, in the aggregate, to any of the following: State, local, or Native American tribal governments, or the private sector. This NPRM is the least burdensome alternative that achieves the objective of the rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This NPRM does not contain information collection requirements covered by 5 CFR Part 1320 (specifically 5 CFR 1320.3(c)) in that appellants choose the information to be provided in their appeal and may choose to interpret the collection of information differently.
Regulation Identifier Number (RIN)
The Department of Transportation assigns a regulation identifier number (RIN) to each regulatory action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulations. The Regulatory Information Service Center publishes the Unified Agenda in April and October of each year. The RIN number is contained in the heading of this document to cross-reference this action with the Unified Agenda.Start List of Subjects
List of Subjects in 46 CFR Part 205
- Administrative practice and procedure
- Government contracts
Accordingly, 46 CFR part 205 is proposed to be revised to read as follows:Start Part
PART 205—AUDIT APPEALS; POLICY AND PROCEDURE
This part establishes the policy and procedure for parties to use when seeking redress and appeals of decisions involving contracts with the Maritime Subsidy Board or The Maritime Administration (MARAD, we, our, or us). A party to a contract (you or your) may appeal MARAD's findings, interpretations, or decisions of annual or special audits.
If you disagree with audit findings and fail to settle any differences with the appropriate Office Director, you may ask the appropriate office Associate Administrator to review the audit findings. If you disagree with the Associate Administrator, you may appeal to the Maritime Administrator (Administrator).
(a) You must submit your appeal in writing to the Administrator within 6 months following the date of the document notifying you of the audit findings, interpretations, or decisions. However, the Administrator may, at his discretion, extend this time limitation in the case of extenuating circumstances.
(b) We will notify you, in writing, if you must submit additional facts for our consideration of the appeal. We will notify you, in writing, once the Maritime Administrator has made a decision regarding your appeal.
The Administrator's decision will be final on all questions of fact involved in the appeal, unless:
(a) Otherwise determined by the Secretary of Transportation pursuant to 49 CFR 1.43(a); or
(b) A court of competent jurisdiction determines the findings to have been fraudulent, capricious, arbitrary, so grossly erroneous as necessarily to imply bad faith, or not supported by substantial evidence.
When a contract contains a disputes article, the disputes article will govern the bases for negotiating disputes regarding audit findings, interpretations, or decisions made by MARAD and any appeals.
Dated: November 13, 2000.
Joel C. Richard,
Secretary, Maritime Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-29386 Filed 11-15-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-81-P