Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Treasury.
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) is amending its rules of practice and procedure to adjust the maximum amount, as set by statute, of each civil money penalty (CMP) within its jurisdiction to account for inflation. This action is required under the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990 (Inflation Adjustment Act), as amended by the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996.
This rule is effective December 11, 2000.Start Further Info
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jean Campbell, Attorney, or Mark Tenhundfeld, Assistant Director, Legislative and Regulatory Activities Division, (202) 874-5090, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, 250 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20219.End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information
The Inflation Adjustment Act  requires the OCC, as well as other Federal agencies with CMP authority, to publish regulations to adjust each CMP authorized by a law that the agency has jurisdiction to administer. The purpose of these adjustments is to maintain the deterrent effect of CMPs and to promote compliance with the law. The Inflation Adjustment Act requires adjustments to be made at least once every four years following the initial adjustment. The OCC's prior adjustment to each CMP was published in the Federal Register on January 22, 1997,  and became effective that same day.
The Inflation Adjustment Act requires that the adjustment reflect the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index between June of the calendar year preceding the adjustment and June of the calendar year in which the amount was last set or adjusted. The Inflation Adjustment Act defines the Consumer Price Index as the Consumer Price Index for all urban consumers published by the Department of Labor (“CPI-U”). In addition, the Inflation Adjustment Act provides rules for rounding off increases, and provides that any increase in a CMP applies only to violations that occur after the date of the adjustment.
Description of the Rule
This final rule adjusts the amount for each type of CMP that the OCC has jurisdiction to impose in accordance with these statutory requirements. It does so by revising the table contained in section 19.240 of our regulations. The table identifies the statutes that provide the OCC with CMP authority, describes the different tiers of penalties provided in each statute (as applicable), and sets out the inflation-adjusted maximum penalty that the OCC may impose pursuant to each statutory provision.
The inflation adjustment for the CMPs was calculated by comparing the CPI-U for June 1996 (156.7) with the CPI-U for June 1999 (166.2), resulting in an inflation adjustment of 6.1 percent. The amount of each CMP was multiplied by the appropriate percentage and the resulting dollar amount was rounded up or down according to the rounding requirements of the statute. In some cases, rounding resulted in no adjustment to the CMP. The table below shows both the present CMPs and inflation adjusted CMPs. The table as published in the rule includes only the CMPs as of the effective date of this rule.Start Printed Page 77251
|U.S. Code citation||Description||Maximum penalty||Amount of increase (6.1 percent)||Amount of increase after rounding||Adjusted maximum penalty|
|12 U.S.C. 93(b), 504, 1817(j)(16), 1818(i)(2), and 1972(2)(F)||Tier 1||5,500||336||5,500|
|12 U.S.C. 164 and 3110(c)||Tier 1||2,000||\a\ 678||200||2,200|
|12 U.S.C. 1832(c) and 3909(d)(1)||1,100||67||1,100|
|12 U.S.C. 1884||110||7||110|
|12 U.S.C. 3110(a)||27,500||1,678||27,500|
|15 U.S.C. 78u-2(b)||Tier 1 (natural person)||5,500||336||5,500|
|Tier 1 (other person)||55,000||3,355||5,000||60,000|
|Tier 2 (natural person)||55,000||3,355||5,000||60,000|
|Tier 2 (other person)||275,000||16,775||25,000||300,000|
|Tier 3 (natural person)||110,000||6,710||10,000||120,000|
|Tier 3 (other person)||550,000||33,550||25,000||575,000|
|42 U.S.C. 4012a(f)(5)||Per violation||350||\b\ 43||350|
|a This penalty was enacted as part of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989. Pub. L. 101-73, 103 Stat. 183 (August 9, 1989). The amount did not change when the OCC adjusted the CMPs for inflation in 1997. Therefore, the percentage increase was calculated by comparing the CPI-U for June 1989 (124.1) to the CPI-U for June 1999 (166.2), resulting in an inflation adjustment of 33.9 percent. The corresponding dollar amount is $678, which would be rounded to an increase of $1,000. However, according to the Inflation Adjustment Act, the initial adjustment of a CMP may not exceed 10 percent of such penalty. Thus, the amount of the increase is capped at $200.|
|b This penalty was enacted in the Riegle Community Development and Regulatory Improvement Act of 1994 (RCDRIA). Pub. L. 103-325, 108 Stat. 2160 (September 23, 1994). The amount did not change when the OCC adjusted the CMPs for inflation in 1997. Therefore, the percentage increase was calculated by comparing the CPI-U for June 1994 to the CPI-U for June 1999, resulting in an increase of 12.3 percent.|
Section 19.241 states that the adjustments made in section 19.240 apply only to violations that occur after December 11, 2000.
The OCC intends to readjust these amounts in the year 2004 and every four years thereafter, assuming there are no further changes to the mandate imposed by the Inflation Adjustment Act.
Public Notice and Comment and Delayed Effective Date Not Required
Under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), an agency may dispense with public notice and an opportunity for comment if the agency finds, for good cause, that these procedural requirements are “impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.”  As described earlier in the Supplementary Information, the Debt Collection Act provides the OCC no discretion in calculating the amount of the civil penalty adjustment. The OCC is, accordingly, unable to vary the amount of the adjustment to reflect any views or suggestions provided by commenters. In that case, notice and comment are unnecessary, and there is, in the opinion of the OCC, good cause to dispense with those procedures.
Both the APA and the RCDRIA require that the effective date of the OCC's regulations generally be delayed. Both statutes contain exceptions if the agency finds good cause to dispense with the delayed effective date. The amendment adopted in this regulation does not substantively affect the rights or obligations of national banks, nor does it impose any new compliance requirements upon them. It merely adjusts the maximum amounts of civil penalties according to a predetermined formula. Moreover, the timing of the adjustment is set by operation of the law that requires the OCC to publish regulations every four years following the initial adjustment. Under these circumstances, the OCC finds good cause to dispense with the APA and RCDRIA delayed effective date provisions. Accordingly, the adjustment to the OCC's civil penalty schedule is effective immediately upon publication in the Federal Register.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act applies only to rules for which an agency publishes a general notice of proposed rulemaking pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b). Because the OCC has determined for good cause that the APA does not require public notice and comment on this final rule, we are not publishing a general notice of proposed rulemaking. Thus, the Regulatory Flexibility Act does not apply to this final rule.
Executive Order 12866
The OCC has determined that this final rule is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
The OCC has determined that this final rule will not result in expenditures by state, local, and tribal governments, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more in any one year. Accordingly, a budgetary impact statement is not required under section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995.Start List of Subjects
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 19
- Administrative practice and procedure
- Equal access to justice
- National banks
Authority and IssuanceStart Amendment Part
For the reasons set out in the preamble, part 19 of chapter I of title 12 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:End Amendment Part Start Part
PART 19—RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDUREEnd Part Start Amendment Part
1. The authority citation for part 19 is revised to read as follows:End Amendment Part Start Amendment Part
2. Subpart O is revised to read as follows:End Amendment Part
Subpart O—Civil Money Penalty Inflation Adjustments
The maximum amount of each civil money penalty within the OCC's jurisdiction is adjusted in accordance with the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990 (28 U.S.C. 2461 note) as follows:
|U.S. Code citation||Description||Adjusted maximum penalty|
|12 U.S.C. 93(b), 504, 1817(j)(16), 1818(i)(2), and 1972(2)(F)||Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3||5,500 27,500 1,175,000|
|12 U.S.C. 164 and 3110(c)||Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3||2,200 22,000 1,175,000|
|12 U.S.C. 1832(c) and 3909(d)(1)||1,100|
|12 U.S.C. 1884||110|
|12 U.S.C. 3110(a)||27,500|
|15 U.S.C. 78u-2(b)||Tier 1 (natural person) Tier 1 (other person) Tier 2 (natural person) Tier 2 (other person) Tier 3 (natural person) Tier 3 (other person)||5,500 60,000 60,000 300,000 120,000 575,000|
|42 U.S.C. 4012a(f)(5)||Per violation Per year||350 115,000|
The adjustments in § 19.240 apply to violations that occur after December 11, 2000.Start Signature
Dated: December 1, 2000.
John D. Hawke, Jr.,
Comptroller of the Currency.
4. See id. The statute's rounding rules require that an increase be rounded to the nearest multiple of: $10 in the case of penalties less than or equal to $100; $100 in the case of penalties greater than $100 but less than or equal to $1,000; $1,000 in the case of penalties greater than $1,000 but less than or equal to $10,000; $5,000 in the case of penalties greater than $10,000 but less than or equal to $100,000; $10,000 in the case of penalties greater than $100,000 but less than or equal to $200,000; and $25,000 in the case of penalties greater than $200,000.Back to Citation
5. The Department of Labor (DOL) computes the CPI-U using two different base time periods, 1967 and 1982-1984, and the Inflation Adjustment Act does not specify which of these base periods should be used to calculate the inflation adjustment. The OCC has used the DOL's CPI-U with 1982-84 as the base period because it reflects the most current method of computing the CPI-U.Back to Citation
6. According to the statute, the inflation adjustment is computed by comparing the CPI-U for June of the year in which the CMPs were “last set or adjusted” with CPI-U for June “of the calendar year preceding [sic] the adjustment.” 28 U.S.C. 2461 note. Therefore, a different formula is required for three CMPs that did not increase when the OCC made its initial inflation adjustment in 1997. These CMPs—the $2,000 penalties under 12 U.S.C. 164 and 12 U.S.C. 3110(c) and the 4350 [penalty under 42 U.S.C. 4012a(f)(5)—did not increase as a result to application of the rounding rules. For those penalties that were not adjusted in 1997, we have used the year in which the CMP was last set by enactment. See footnotes a and b to the table.Back to Citation
9. The Inflation Adjustment Act required the initial adjustment to be made within 180 days following enactment of the statute, that is, by October 23, 1996.Back to Citation
[FR Doc. 00-31165 Filed 12-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-33-P