Skip to Content

Notice

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Order Granting Approval of Proposed Rule Change by the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. To Allow In-Firm Delivery of the Regulatory Element of the Continuing Education Requirements

Document Details

Information about this document as published in the Federal Register.

Published Document

This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.

Start Preamble December 11, 2000.

I. Introduction

On October 25, 2000, the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (“NASD” or “Association”), through its wholly owned subsidiary, NASD Regulation, Inc. (“NASD Regulation”), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission” or “SEC”), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”[1] and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,[2] a proposed rule change that would permit the in-firm delivery of the Regulatory Element of the Continuing Education Requirements. Notice of the proposed rule change appeared in the Federal Register on November 6, 2000.[3] The Commission received one comment on the proposed rule change.[4] This order approves the proposed rule change.

II. Description of the Proposal

NASD Regulation proposes to amend NASD Rule 1120(a) to permit the in-firm delivery of the Regulatory Element of the Continuing Education Requirements. Currently, this computer-based training program can be administered to registered persons only at the location of an outside vender.

The Regulatory Element is a 31/2 hour computer-based training program. NASD Rule 1120(a) requires that each registered person, who is not exempt from the Rule, complete the Regulatory Element on the occurrence of his or her second registration anniversary and every three years thereafter. On each occasion, the training must be completed within 120 days after the registered person's anniversary date. A registered person who has not completed the Regulatory Element within the prescribed time period is deemed to be inactive until the Regulatory Element has been fulfilled, and may not conduct, or be compensated for, activities requiring a securities registration.

The Securities Industry/Regulatory Council on Continuing Education (“Council”) is responsible for the oversight of the continuing education program for the securities industry. The Council's duties include recommending and helping to develop specific content and questions for the Regulatory Element, and minimum core curricula for the Firm Element. The Council is comprised of representatives from a broad cross section of broker/dealers, and six self-regulatory organizations, including the NASD. The Council, working with representatives from the North American Securities Administrators Association has developed a model under which broker/dealers may deliver the Regulatory Element computer-based training on firm premises. The model requires that the broker/dealer meet certain conditions for in-firm delivery relating to computer hardware and to the security of the training delivery environment. The proposed amendments to Rule 1120(a) encapsulate the delivery requirements as specified by the Council. Firms of any size may take advantage of the in-firm delivery procedures.

III. Summary of Comments

The ICI expressed its support for the proposal, stating that the proposed changes may facilitate the ability of ICI's members to comply with the Regulatory Element requirements.[5] Additionally, the ICI believes the proposed amendment will reduce the time and any related travel costs that registered representatives spend to take the Regulatory Element.[6] Finally, the ICI believes that the conditions proposed in the amendment regarding in-firm delivery adequately balance the interest of NASD Regulation in protecting the integrity of the Regulatory Element with the interest of member firms in not being unduly burdened when exercising this option.[7] For these reasons, the ICI expressed its support of the proposed amendments to NASD Rule 1120.

IV. Discussion

The Commission has reviewed carefully the proposed rule change, and finds that it is consistent with the Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.[8] Specifically, the Commission finds that approval of the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 15A(b)(6) [9] of the Act.

Section 15A(b)(6) [10] requires that the rules of a registered national securities association be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, promote just and equitable principles of trade, foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in securities, remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and in general, protect investors and the public interest. The Commission believes that the proposal should facilitate compliance with the Regulatory Element of the Continuing Education Requirements by making the program easily accessible to registered persons via in-firm delivery, as opposed to requiring that it be administered at the location of an outside vendor, and by allowing firms of any size to partake of the in-firm delivery procedures. The Commission is satisfied that the proposal provides reasonable safeguards to uphold the integrity of the program, as well as delineating proper conditions for in-firm delivery relating to computer hardware, consistent with the requirements specified by the Council. Finally, the Commission believes the proposal establishes reasonable requirements with regard to the security of the training delivery environment, as specified by the Council.

V. Conclusion

For the above reasons, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the provisions of the Act, in general, and with Section 15A(b)(6),[11] in particular.

It Is Therefore Ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,[12] that the Start Printed Page 79144proposed rule change (SR-NASD-00-64), be and hereby is approved.

Start Signature

For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority.[13]

Margaret H. McFarland,

Deputy Secretary.

End Signature End Preamble

Footnotes

3.  See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 43492 (October 27, 2000), 65 FR 66576.

Back to Citation

4.  See November 22, 2000 letter from Tamara K. Reed, Associate Counsel, Investment Company Institute (“ICI”) to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary, SEC (“ICI Letter”).

Back to Citation

5.  See ICI Letter at p. 1.

Back to Citation

7.  See ICI Letter at p. 2.

Back to Citation

8.  In approving this proposal, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).

Back to Citation

[FR Doc. 00-32092 Filed 12-15-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-M