Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
Notice of intent to issue NPDES general permits and request for comments.
Region VIII of EPA is hereby giving notice of its tentative determination to issue National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) general permits for facilities or operations that generate, treat, and/or use/dispose of sewage sludge by means of land application, landfill, and surface disposal in the States of CO, MT, ND, and WY and in Indian country in the States of CO, MT, ND, SD, WY and UT (except for the Goshute Indian Reservation and the Navajo Indian Reservation).
On June 21, 2000 and September 21, 2000, U.S. District Judge Donald W. Molloy issued orders stating that until all necessary total maximum daily loads under section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act are established for a particular water quality limited segment, the EPA is not to issue any new permits or increase permitted discharges under the NPDES program. (The orders were issued in the lawsuit Friends of the Wild Swan, Inc., et al., v. U.S. E.P.A., et al., CV 97-35-M-DWM, District of Montana, Missoula Division.) EPA finds that the issuance of these proposed general permits does not conflict with this order, because (1) the proposed permits would not authorize any point source discharges into waters of the United States and (2) as discussed under the “Protection of Public Health and The Environment” section of the Fact Sheet, the use and/or disposal of sewage sludge in compliance with the conditions of these permits is not likely to have any adverse effect on any waterbody in Montana that has been listed under section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act. If any member of the public believes that EPA should interpret the District Court's order otherwise, EPA requests that this issue be brought to its attention during the public comment period on these proposed permits.
Region VIII is proposing to use general permits instead of individual permits for permitting such sewage sludge related activities in order to reduce the Region's administrative burden of issuing separate individual permits. The administrative burden for the regulated sources is expected to be about the same under the general permits as with individual permits, but it will be much quicker to obtain permit coverage with general permits than with individual permits. The permit requirements would be essentially the same with an individual permit or under the general permit. Facilities or operations that incinerate sewage sludge are not eligible for coverage under these general permits and must apply for an individual permit. Wastewater lagoon systems that are not using/disposing of sewage sludge do not need to apply for permit coverage unless notified by the permit issuing authority. The deadlines for applying for coverage under the general permits are given in the permits and the Fact Sheet. For most facilities/operations the deadline is 90 days after the effective date of the permit.
Public comments on this proposal must be received, in writing, on or before March 5, 2001.
Public comments should be sent to: State Assistance Program (8P-SA); Attention: NPDES Permits; U.S. EPA, Region VIII; 999 18th Street, Suite 300; Denver, CO 80202-2466.Start Further Info
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
For a copy of the draft permit and Fact Sheet, please write William Kennedy at the above address or telephone (303) 312-6285. Copies of the draft permit and Fact Sheet may also be downloaded from the EPA Region VIII web page at http://www.epa.gov/region08/water/wastewater/biohome/biohome.html. Questions regarding the specific permit requirements may be directed to Bob Brobst, telephone (303) 312-6129.
Public Comment Period
Public comments are invited. Comments must be written and must be received by no later than March 5, 2001. Comments should be sent to: State Assistance Program (8P-SA); Attention: NPDES Permits; U.S. EPA, Region VIII; 999 18th Street, Suite 300; Denver, CO 80202-2466. Each comment should cite the page number and, where possible, the section(s) and/or paragraph(s) in the draft permit or Fact Sheet to which each comment refers. Commenters should use a separate paragraph for each issue discussed. Start Printed Page 794End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information
On February 19, 1993, (58 FR 9248) the EPA promulgated “Standards for the Use or Disposal of Sewage Sludge” (40 CFR part 503) and made revisions to the NPDES regulations to include the permitting of facilities/operations that generate, treat, and/or use/disposal of sewage sludge. The 503 regulations were amended on August 4, 1999 (64 FR 42551). The State of Utah currently is the only State in Region VIII that has been authorized to administer the biosolids (sludge) program. However, the State of South Dakota has applied for authorization to administer the biosolids program and Region VIII has public noticed (65 FR 59385) its intent to approve the application. Since the State's application is being processed, Region VIII does not plan to issue a general permit for South Dakota unless the State's application is denied. It is proposed that general permits be issued for facilities or operations that generate, treat, and/or use/dispose of sewage sludge by means of land application, landfill, and surface disposal within the following areas:
|State||Permit No.||Area covered by the general permit|
|Colorado||COG650000||State of Colorado except for Federal Facilities and Indian country.|
|COG651000||Indian country within the State of Colorado and the portions of the Ute Mountain Indian Reservation located in New Mexico and in Utah.|
|COG652000||Federal Facilities in the State of Colorado, except those located in Indian country, which are covered under permit COG51000.|
|Montana||MTG650000||State of Montana except for Indian country.|
|MTG651000||Indian country in the State of Montana.|
|North Dakota||NDG650000||State of North Dakota except for Indian country.|
|NDG651000||Indian country within the State of North Dakota (except for Indian country located within the former boundaries of the Lake Traverse Indian Reservation, which are covered under permit SDG651000) and that portion of the Standing Rock Indian Reservation located in South Dakota.|
|South Dakota||SDG651000||Indian country within the State of South Dakota (except for the Standing Rock Indian Reservation, which is covered under permit NDG651000), that portion of the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation located in Nebraska, and Indian country located in North Dakota within the former boundaries of the Lake Traverse Indian Reservation.|
|Utah||UTG651000||Indian country within the State of Utah except for the Goshute Indian Reservation, Navajo Indian Reservation, and Ute Mountain Indian Reservation (which is covered under permit COG651000).|
|Wyoming||WYG650000||State of Wyoming except for Indian country.|
|WYG651000||Indian country within the State of Wyoming.|
The State of Utah has been delegated permitting authority for sewage sludge and the State of South Dakota has applied for that authority, therefore general permits will be issued only for Indian country in those States. The general permit for Indian country in Utah does not include the portions of the Goshute Indian Reservation and the Navajo Indian Reservation in Utah because the permitting activities for these reservations are done by Region IX of EPA. The State of Colorado has not been delegated permitting authority for Federal facilities, so a general permit is proposed for Federal facilities not located in Indian country.
Authorization under the general permits may be for one of the following three categories: Category 1—Facilities/operations that generate and/or partially treat sewage sludge, but do not use/dispose of sewage sludge; Category 2—Facilities/operations that use/dispose of sewage sludge and may also generate and/or treat sewage sludge; and Category 3—Wastewater lagoon systems that need to land apply sewage sludge on an occasional, restricted basis. Authorization under the general permit will be limited to one of the three categories, but authorization may be granted to one or more subcategories under Category 2. In applying for authorization under the general permit, the applicant will be required to specify under which category or subcategory(s) authorization is being requested. However, the permit issuing authority will have the final determination as to which category or subcategory(s) the authorization will be granted. The requirements in the permit for the use/disposal of sewage sludge are based primarily on 40 CFR part 503.
Since these permits do not involve discharges to waters of the United States, certification under section 401(a)(1) of the Clean Water Act is not necessary for the issuance of these permits and certification will not be requested.
Economic Impact (Executive Order 12866): EPA has determined that the issuance of this general permit is not a “significant regulatory action” under the terms of Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735 (October 4, 1993)) and is therefore not subject to formal OMB review prior to proposal.
Paperwork Reduction Act: EPA has reviewed the requirements imposed on regulated facilities in these proposed general permits under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. The information collection requirements of these permits have already been approved by the Office of Management and Budget in submissions made for the NPDES permit program under the provisions of the Clean Water Act.
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., as amended by the Small Business regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA): The RFA requires that EPA prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis for rules subject to the requirements of 5 U.S.C. 553(b) that have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. The permit proposed today, however, is not a “rule” subject to the requirements of 5 U.S.C. 553(b) and is therefore not subject to the RFA.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act: Section 201 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA), Public Law 104-4, generally requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their “regulatory actions” defined to be the same as “rules” subject to the RFA on tribal state, and local, governments and the private sector. The permit proposed today, however, is not a “rule” subject to the RFA and is therefore not subject to the requirements of the UMRA.Start Signature
Dated: December 22, 2000.
Kerrigan G. Clough,
Assistant Regional Administrator, Office of Partnerships and Regulatory Assistance.
[FR Doc. 01-220 Filed 1-3-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P