Skip to Content


Midwestern Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Petition

Document Details

Information about this document as published in the Federal Register.

Document Statistics
Document page views are updated periodically throughout the day and are cumulative counts for this document including its time on Public Inspection. Counts are subject to sampling, reprocessing and revision (up or down) throughout the day.
Published Document

This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.

Start Preamble January 4, 2001.

Take notice that on December 21, 2000, Midwestern Gas Transmission Company (Midwestern), PO Box 2511, Houston, Texas 77252-2511, filed in Docket No. CP01-56-000 a Petition for Exemption of Temporary Acts and Operations from Certificate Requirements pursuant to Rule 207(a)(5) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure) 18 CFR 385.207(a)(5)), and section 7(c)(1)(B) of the Natural Gas Act (NGA) seeking approval to inactivate, on a temporary basis, a compressor unit at its Station 2110 located in Pike County, Indiana, all as more fully set forth in this petition which is on file with the Commission and open to pubic inspection. The filing may be viewed at​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Specifically, Midwestern requests authority to inactivate, for a period of 18 to 24 months, one 1,100 horsepower turbine compressor unit (Unit 2110-B) at its Station 2110 on its Portland to Joliet Line (2100 Line), located in Pike County, Indiana. During the time period that the unit is idle, Midwestern will decide whether it is appropriate to apply for permanent abandonment or, alternatively, to replace the unit pursuant to section 2.55(b) of the Commission's regulations.

Midwestern avers that inactivating Unit 2110-B will not affect any current services on its system. In support of its position, Midwestern states that when Unit 2110-B is operating its 2100 Line has a certificated capacity of 678 MMSCFD and that the inactivation of Unit 2110-B will reduce the capacity of the 2100 Line by only 4 MMSCFD, Midwestern also points out that the average throughput of its system over the past two years has been 270 Start Printed Page 1972MMSCFD and that for the past three months the average throughput has been 396 MMSCFD.

Questions regarding the details of this proposed project should be directed to David E. Maranville, Counsel, Midwestern Gas Transmission Company, PO Box 2511, Houston, Texas 77252-2511, call (713) 420-3525.

There are two ways to become involved in the Commission's review of this project. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status by becoming a party to the proceedings for this project should, on or before January 25, 2001, file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, a motion to intervene in accordance with the requirements of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211) and the Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A person obtaining party status will be placed on the service list maintained by the Secretary of the Commission and will receive copies of all documents filed by the applicant and by all other parties. A party must submit 14 copies of filings made with the Commission and must mail a copy to the applicant and to every other party in the proceeding. Only parties to the proceeding can ask for court review of Commission orders in the proceeding.

However, a person does not have to intervene in order to have comments considered. The second way to participate is by filing with the Secretary of the Commission, as soon as possible, an original and two copies of comments in support of or in opposition to this project. The Commission will consider these comments in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but the filing of a comment alone will not serve to make the filer a party to the proceeding. The Commission's rules requires that persons filing comments in opposition to the project provide copies of their protests only to the party or parties directly involved in the protest.

Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commenters will be placed on the Commission's environmental mailing list, will receive copies of the environmental documents, and will be notified of meetings associated with the Commission's environmental review process. Environmental commenters will not be required to serve copies of filed documents on all other parties. However, the non-party commenters will not receive copies of all documents filed by other parties or issued by the Commission (except for the mailing of environmental documents issued by the Commission) and will not have the right to seek court review of the Commission's final order.

The Commission may issue a preliminary determination on non-environmental issues prior to the completion of its review of the environmental aspects of the project. This preliminary determination typically considers such issues as the need for the project and its economic effect on existing customers of the applicant, on other pipelines in the area, and on landowners and communities. For example, the Commission considers the extent to which the applicant may need to exercise eminent domain to obtain rights-of-way for the proposed project and balances that against the non-environmental benefits to be provided by the project. Therefore, if a person has comments on community and landowner impacts from this proposal, it is important either to file comments or to intervene, as early in the process as possible.

Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commissions web site at​efi/​doorbell.htm.

If the Commission decides to set the application for a formal hearing before an Administrative Law Judge, the Commission will issue another notice describing that process. At the end of the Commission's review process, a final Commission order approving or denying a certificate will be issued.

Start Signature

David P. Boergers,


End Signature End Preamble

[FR Doc. 01-637 Filed 1-9-01; 8:45 am]