Skip to Content

Rule

Labor Condition Applications and Requirements for Employers Using Nonimmigrants on H-1B Visas in Specialty Occupations and as Fashion Models; Labor Certification Process for Permanent Employment of Aliens in the United States

Document Details

Information about this document as published in the Federal Register.

Published Document

This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.

Start Preamble

AGENCY:

Employment and Training Administration, Labor, in concurrence with the Wage and Hour Division, Employment Standards Administration, Labor.

ACTION:

Correction to interim final rule.

SUMMARY:

This document contains a correction to the Interim Final Rule (IFR) published on December 20, 2000 (65 FR 80110), which implemented recent legislation and clarified existing Departmental rules relating to the temporary employment in the United States of nonimmigrants under H-1B visas. As discussed in the preamble to the Interim Final Rule, the Department concluded that Appendix A to subpart H (Guidance for the Determination of the “Actual Wage”) would not be included in the rule. However, the Department inadvertently omitted the amendatory instruction to remove the appendix from the Code of Federal Regulations. This document corrects that error.

DATES:

This rule is effective January 19, 2001.

Start Further Info

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Michael Ginley, Director, Office of Enforcement Policy, Wage and Hour Division, Employment Standards Administration, Department of Labor, Room S-3510, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210. Telephone: (202) 693-0745 (this is not a toll-free number).

Dale M. Ziegler, Chief, Division of Foreign Labor Certifications, U.S. Employment Service, Employment and Training Administration, Department of Labor, Room C-4318, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210. Telephone: (202) 693-3010 (this is not a toll-free number).

End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

On January 5, 1999, the Department published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) (64 FR 628), seeking public comment on proposed revisions to its regulations relating to the employment of H-1B nonimmigrants which were necessitated by the enactment of the American Competitiveness and Workforce Improvement Act of 1998 (ACWIA). The Department also sought further comment on certain proposals which were previously published for comment as a Proposed Rule on October 31, 1995.

Among the matters addressed in the Interim Final Rule (65 FR 80191-80194) was the requirement of section 212(n)(1)(A)(i)(I) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) that an employer seeking to employ H-1B nonimmigrants agree that it will pay the nonimmigrants at least the higher of the prevailing wage or the “actual wage level paid by the employer to all other individuals with similar experience and qualifications for the specific employment in question.” Specifically, the Department had sought comment on Appendix A to Subpart H of the regulations, which contained guidance and examples of the appropriate methods for determination of the actual wage for purposes of the H-1B wage requirement. The underlying regulatory provisions at §§ 655.731(a)(1), 655.731(b)(2), and 655.760(a)(3) were not open for notice and comment.

In the Interim Final Rule preamble, the Department fully described and responded to the comments and stated:

After carefully considering all the comments, the Department has concluded that Appendix A—which was created in response to employers' requests for technical guidance—has not served its intended purpose and has, instead, caused some confusion. The Department has, therefore, decided that Appendix A will not be included in the Interim Final Rule. The controlling standards for determining and documenting an employee's “actual wage” are contained in the current regulation, 20 CFR 655.731(a)(1), 655.731(b)(2), and 655.760(a)(3) (none of which were opened for comment in the NPRM). If the need arises in the future, the Department, as appropriate, will provide compliance advice or technical assistance further explaining the current regulation.

[65 FR 80193]

Although this preamble discussion made the Department's intention perfectly clear, and the Table of Contents did not contain Appendix A, the Department neglected to include an explicit instruction in the regulatory text to delete Appendix A. It is, therefore, necessary that a correction Rule be issued to achieve the Interim Final Rule's intention. This Final Rule provides the needed correction, and removes Appendix A from the H-1B regulations.

Procedural Requirements

The Department is of the view that this correction to an inadvertent error in the Interim Final Rule is not a rule to which the procedural requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act or the various statutes and executive orders relating to rules apply. If this correction is a rule, however, notice and comment is not required. Interested parties have had two opportunities to comment on Appendix A. In addition, the Appendix was an interpretation of § 655.731 and, as required by the rules of the Federal Register, did not contain new requirements or restrictions. Furthermore, if the correction is a rule, the Department finds good cause not to provide further notice and comment. Such additional notice and comment would be unnecessary and contrary to the public interest since the public was advised in the preamble to the Interim Final Rule that the Appendix was deleted and unnecessary confusion would result if this correction were not made immediately. For the same reasons, the correction is effective on January 19, 2001, the effective date of the Interim Final Rule.

This correction contains no paperwork requirements to which the Paperwork Reduction Act applies. In addition, this action, if a rule, is not a “significant regulatory action” within the meaning of Executive Order 12866. Furthermore, this action is not a “major rule” within the meaning of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Act or an “unfunded mandate” within the meaning of Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995. Finally, the action will not have federalism implications within the meaning of Executive Order 13132, and a regulatory flexibility analysis is not required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Start Amendment Part

Accordingly, the Department makes the following correction to the interim final rule published on December 20, 2000. On page 80233, in the first column immediately preceding the heading for subpart I, insert instruction 21a to read as follows:

End Amendment Part Start Amendment Part

21a. Appendix A to subpart H of part 655 is removed.

End Amendment Part Start Signature

Signed at Washington, DC, this 12th day of February, 2001.

Raymond J. Uhalde,

Deputy Assistant Secretary, Employment and Training Administration.

Thomas M. Markey,

Acting Administrator, Wage and Hour Division, Employment Standards Administration.

End Signature End Supplemental Information

[FR Doc. 01-4126 Filed 2-16-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-U