Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review.
On January 10, 2001, the Department of Commerce published the preliminary results of administrative review of the antidumping duty order on electrolytic manganese dioxide from Japan. The review covers one producer/exporter, Tosoh Corporation, during the period of review April 1, 1999, through December 31, 1999.
We gave interested parties an opportunity to comment on the preliminary results. We did not receive any comments. The review indicates the existence of no dumping margins for Tosoh Corporation during this period.
March 26, 2001.Start Further Info
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karin Ryerson or Richard Rimlinger, Office of AD/CVD Enforcement 3, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3174 or (202) 482-4477, respectively.End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information
The Applicable Statute and Regulations
Unless otherwise indicated, all citations to the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act) are references to the provisions effective January 1, 1995, the effective date of the amendments made to the Act, by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA). In addition, unless otherwise indicated, all citations to the Department of Commerce's (the Department's) regulations are to 19 CFR part 351 (2000).
On January 10, 2001, the Department published in the Federal Register the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on electrolytic manganese dioxide (EMD) from Japan. See Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Electrolytic Manganese Dioxide from Japan, 66 FR 1948 (January 10, 2001) (Preliminary Results).
Scope of Review
Imports covered by this review are shipments of EMD from Japan. EMD is manganese dioxide (MnO2) that has been refined in an electrolysis process. The subject merchandise is an intermediate product used in the production of dry-cell batteries. EMD is sold in three physical forms (powder, chip, or plate) and two grades (alkaline and zinc chloride). EMD in all three forms and both grades is included in the scope of the order. This merchandise is currently classifiable under item number 2820.10.0000 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). The HTSUS number is provided for convenience and customs purposes. It is not determinative of the products subject to the order. The written product description remains dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
We received no comments from interested parties as a result of our preliminary results of review. Therefore, we are adopting those preliminary results as the final results of this review.
On April 20, 2000, the International Trade Commission (ITC), pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act, determined that revocation of the antidumping duty Start Printed Page 16444order on EMD from Japan would not be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. Therefore, because the order was revoked on May 31, 2000, as a result of the ITC's determination, with an effective date of January 1, 2000, no deposit requirements are effective for shipments entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after January 1, 2000.
Final Results of Review
We have determined that a weighted-average margin of zero percent exists for Tosoh for the period April 1, 1999, through December 31, 1999. The Department shall determine, and the U.S. Customs Service (Customs) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. In accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b), we have calculated exporter/importer-specific assessment rates. We will direct Customs to liquidate affected entries during the review period at a rate of zero percent.
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely notification of return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing this determination in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.Start Signature
Dated: March 16, 2001.
Timothy J. Hauser,
Acting Under Secretary for International Trade.
[FR Doc. 01-7405 Filed 3-23-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P