Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”), and Rule 19b-4 thereunder, notice is hereby given that on January 26, 2001, the Pacific Exchange, Inc. (“PCX” or “Exchange”), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The proposed rule change has been filed by the PCX as a “non-controversial” rule change under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) under the Act. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
The PCX is proposing to add new PCX Rule 6.49 to allow members representing an options order to solicit a third party outside of the trading crowd. Below is the text of the proposed rule change. Proposed new language is in italics.
¶4995 Solicited Transactions
(a) A member or member organization representing an order in options (“originating order”) may solicit another member, member organization or non-member broker/dealer outside the trading crowd (“solicited party”) to participate in the transaction on a proprietary basis provided the following criteria are met.
(1) The member or member organization, upon entering the trading crowd to execute the transaction must announce to the trading crowd the same terms and conditions of the originating order that have been disclosed to the solicited party;
(2) The member or member organization must bid at the price he is prepared to buy from the solicited party or offer at the price he is prepared to sell to the solicited party; and
(3) The member or member organization must give the trading crowd a reasonable opportunity to accept the bid or offer.
The members of the trading crowd will have priority over the solicited party order.
(b) It will be considered conduct inconsistent with just and equitable principles of trade for any member, member organization or person associated with a member or member organization, who has knowledge of all material terms and conditions of an originating order, a solicited order, or a facilitation order, the execution of which are imminent, to enter, based on such knowledge, an order to buy or sell an option on the underlying securities of any option that is the subject of the order, or an order to buy or sell the security underlying any option that is the subject of the order, or any order to buy or sell any related instrument until either:
(1) All the terms and conditions of the originating order and any changes in the terms or conditions of the order of which the member, member organization or person associated with the member or member Start Printed Page 19272organization has knowledge are disclosed to the trading crowd, or
(2) The trade can no longer reasonably be considered imminent in view of the passage of time since the order was received.
For the proposes of this rule, an order to buy or sell a “related instrument” means, in reference to an index option, an order to buy or sell securities comprising 10% or more of the component securities in the index or an order to buy or sell a futures contract on an economically equivalent index.
(c) “Solicited” shall be written in the “Optional Data” area on the order ticket of the Solicited order.
¶4981 Responsibilities of Floor Brokers
.05 A Floor Broker's use of due diligence in handling an order shall include the immediate and continuous representation of market and marketable orders at the trading post where the option class represented by his order is designated for trading, except that a Floor Broker who is acting pursuant to Rule 6.49 need not represent such orders immediately at the designated trading post.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the PCX included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The PCX has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
The purpose of the proposed rule change is to allow a member that is representing an options order on the trading floor to solicit a third party outside of the trading crowd to participate in the transaction on a proprietary basis before representing the order in the trading crowd.
Currently, PCX Rule 6.46, Commentary .05, states that a Floor Broker's duty of due diligence in handling an order includes the immediate representation of market and marketable limit orders at the trading post where the options class represented by his order is designated for trading. The PCX has interpreted this to mean that a Floor Broker who receives an order must immediately represent it in the crowd before soliciting the other side of the trade.
Under the proposed rule change a Floor Broker will now have the ability to solicit third parties outside the trading crowd before representing the order in the crowd. The Floor Broker, however, will still have a due diligence obligation to his customer when executing the transaction. The proposed rule change will allow option transactions to be solicited provided that the member, upon entering the trading crowd to execute the transaction, (1) announces to the crowd the same terms and conditions that were disclosed to the solicited party; (2) bids (offers) at the price that he is prepared to bid (offer) to the solicited party; and (3) gives the trading crowd a reasonable opportunity to accept the bid (offer). If a member in the trading crowd decides to match or better the terms of the transaction, the proposed rule grants the member in the trading crowd priority over the solicited party.
Further, the proposed rule will prohibit the member who is representing the order to enter an order to buy or sell an option on the underlying securities of any option that is the subject of the order, or an order to buy or sell the security underlying any option that is the subject of the order, or any order to buy or sell any related instrument until the terms of the original order are disclosed or the trade can no longer be considered imminent in view of passage of time. This portion of the proposed rule change—which will also apply to orders facilitated under the provisions of PCX Rule 6.47—seek to prohibit anticipatory hedging that is based on inside information. The Commission has approved a similar rule change by the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc. The Exchange recognizes the importance of fully disclosing the orders that comprise a solicited transaction to the trading crowd and believes that the current proposal allows customer orders to receive full consideration by the trading crowd.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with section 6(b)  of the Act, in general, and furthers the objectives of section 6(b)(5), in particular, in that it is designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received from Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments on the proposed rule change were neither solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action
The foregoing proposed rule change has become effective pursuant to section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act  and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder  because the proposed rule change (1) does not significantly affect the protection of investors or the public interest; (2) does not impose any significant burden on competition; and (3) does not become operative until more than 30 days from the date on which it was filed, and the PCX provided the Commission with written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at least five days prior to the filing date. At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.Start Printed Page 19273
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether it is consistent with the Act. Persons making written submissions should file six copies thereof with the Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549-0609. Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such filing will also be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the PCX. All submissions should refer to File No. SR-PCX-00-36, and should be submitted by May 4, 2001.Start Signature
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority.
Jonathan G. Katz,
3. The PCX filed its submission of January 26, 2001, in the form of an amendment to an earlier version of the proposed rule change filed with the Commission on October 24, 2000. See Letter from Hassan Abedi, attorney, PCX, to Nancy J. Sanow, assistant director, Division of Market Regulation, the Commission, dated January 25, 2001. For purposes of Rule 19b4(f)(6) under the Act, the Commission deems the date of filing and effectiveness of the proposed rule change to be January 26, 2001.Back to Citation
5. The proposed rule differs from current PCX Rule 6.47(c), which also allows for solicitation of options orders in specified circumstances. Under Rule 6.47(c), a member first represents an order to the trading crowd, and if the member cannot fill the order, then an attempt to solicit the other side may be made outside the crowd. Rule 6.47(c) requires the member to continue to represent the order in the trading crowd while he attempts to solicit the other side. However, once the other side is obtained from outside the trading crowd, the member is permitted to cross the two sides, with the solicited order receiving priority over the trading crowd. Under proposed Rule 6.49, a member is permitted to solicit the other side of an order before taking the order to the trading crowd. However, as discussed below, once the member obtains the other side, he must then take the order to the trading crowd, disclose the terms of the order, and allow the crowd to step up and match the terms or better them. If the trading does decide to step up, it receives priority over the solicited order.Back to Citation
6. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34959 (November 9, 1994), 59 FR 59446 (November 17, 1994). See also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 42894 (June 2, 2000), 65 FR 36850 (June 12, 2000) (concerning a similar rule change by the American Stock Exchange LLC).Back to Citation
[FR Doc. 01-9113 Filed 4-12-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M