Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
Direct final rule.
EPA is removing the conditional status of its approval of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision that requires all major sources of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and nitrogen oxides (NOX) to implement reasonably available control technology (RACT). Pennsylvania has satisfied the condition imposed in EPA's conditional limited approval published on March 23, 1998 (63 FR 13789). The intended effect of this action is to remove the conditional nature of EPA's approval of Pennsylvania's VOC and NOX RACT Regulation. The regulation retains its limited approval status. Conversion of the Pennsylvania VOC and NOX RACT Regulation from limited to full approval will occur when EPA has approved the case-by-case RACT determinations submitted by Pennsylvania.
This rule is effective on June 18, 2001 without further notice, unless EPA receives adverse written comment by June 4, 2001. If EPA receives such comments, it will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register and inform the public that the rule will not take effect.
Written comments should be mailed to David L. Arnold, Chief, Air Quality Planning and Information Services Branch, Mailcode 3AP21, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the documents relevant to this action are available for public inspection during normal business hours at the Air Protection Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Start Printed Page 22124Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103, and the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Air Quality, P.O. Box 8468, 400 Market Street, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17105.Start Further Info
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ellen Wentworth, (215) 814-2034, at the EPA Region III address above, or by e-mail at email@example.com.End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information
On March 23, 1998 (63 FR 13789), EPA granted a conditional limited approval of the Pennsylvania SIP that established and required all major sources of VOCs and NOX to implement RACT. This approval was granted on the condition that Pennsylvania must, by no later than April 22, 1999, certify that (1) it had submitted case-by-case RACT proposals for all sources subject to the RACT requirements currently known to the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP), or (2) demonstrate that the emissions from any remaining subject sources represented a de minimis level of emissions as defined in the rulemaking document.
On April 22, 1999, the PADEP submitted a letter certifying that it had met the terms and conditions imposed by EPA in its March 23, 1998 conditional limited approval of its VOC and NOX RACT regulations by submitting 485 case by case VOC/NOX RACT determinations as SIP revisions. EPA concurs that Pennsylvania's April 22, 1999 certification satisfies the condition imposed in its conditional limited approval published on March 23, 1998. EPA is, therefore, removing the conditional status of its approval of Pennsylvania's VOC and NOX RACT regulation. The regulation retains its limited approval status. Conversion to full approval will occur when EPA has approved the case-by-case RACT determinations submitted by PADEP.
II. EPA Action
EPA is removing the conditional status of its approval of Pennsylvania's VOC and NOX RACT Regulation. The regulation will retain limited approval status until EPA has approved the case-by-case RACT SIP revisions proposals submitted by PADEP. This action is being published without prior proposal because we view this as a noncontroversial amendment and because we anticipate no adverse comments. In a separate document in the “Proposed Rules” section of this Federal Register publication, we are proposing to remove the conditional status of the approval of the Pennsylvania's VOC and NOX RACT Regulation. This action will be effective without further notice unless we receive relevant adverse comment by June 4, 2001. If we receive such comment, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take effect. We will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this time. If no such comments are received by June 4, 2001, you are advised that this section will be effective on June 18, 2001.
III. Administrative Requirements
A. General Requirements
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this action is not a “significant regulatory action” and therefore is not subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. This action merely approves state law as meeting federal requirements and imposes no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4). This rule also does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999), because it merely approves a state rule implementing a federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. As required by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61 FR 4729, February 7, 1996), in issuing this rule, EPA has taken the necessary steps to eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity, minimize potential litigation, and provide a clear legal standard for affected conduct. EPA has complied with Executive Order 12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15, 1988) by examining the takings implications of the rule in accordance with the “Attorney General's Supplemental Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk and Avoidance of Unanticipated Takings” issued under the executive order. This rule does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This rule is not a “major rule” as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by July 2, 2001. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of the removal of the conditional status of EPA's approval of Pennsylvania's VOC and NOX RACT Start Printed Page 22125regulation does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)Start List of Subjects
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
- Environmental protection
- Air pollution control
- Nitrogen dioxide
- Reporting and record keeping requirements
Dated: April 24, 2001.
William C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:End Amendment Part Start Part
PART 52—[AMENDED]End Part Start Amendment Part
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:End Amendment Part
2. In § 52.2026, paragraph (f) is removed and reserved.End Amendment Part End Supplemental Information
[FR Doc. 01-10984 Filed 5-2-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P