Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”) and Rule 19b-4 thereunder, notice is hereby given that on May 4, 2001, the Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. (“Nasdaq”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “Commission”) the proposed rule changes as described in Items I and II Start Printed Page 30255below, which Items have been prepared by Nasdaq. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. For the reasons discussed below, the Commission is granting accelerated approval of the proposed rule change.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
Nasdaq filed a proposed rule change to amend NASD Rule 7010 of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (“NASD” or “Association”). Under the proposal, Nasdaq will retroactively establish as permanent the fees currently assessed for Level 1 market data delivered to non-professional users on a monthly or per query basis. Nasdaq will make the proposed rule change effective immediately upon approval.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, Nasdaq included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item III below. Nasdaq has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
Nasdaq states that it has consistently supported the broadest, most effective dissemination of market information to public investors. Towards that end, in April of 1999, Nasdaq implemented a one-year pilot program that reduced by 50% the user fees for Level 1 market data delivered to non-professional users on a monthly basis (from $4 to $2), and also for Level 1 market data delivered to non-professional users on a per query basis (from $.01 to $.005).
In April of 2000, Nasdaq further reduced by 50% the user fees for Level 1 market data delivered to non-professional users on a monthly basis, but maintained the current fees for Level 1 market data delivered to non-professional users on a per query basis. Under the current pilot, the non-professional per user fee was reduced from $2 to $1 per month (equating to a 75% reduction in fees in two years), and the per query fee was maintained at $.005 per query.
Nasdaq believes that reducing market data fees helps meet the demand for realtime market data by non-professional market participants. In addition, Nasdaq believes that reduced Nasdaq rates lessen the costs to NASD member firms of supplying real-time market data to their customers through automated means and encourages current delayed-data vendors to offer increased access to real-time Level 1 data to their subscribers.
2. Statutory Basis
Nasdaq believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the provisions of Section 15A(b)(5)  of the Act in that the proposal provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among members and issuers and other persons using any facility or system which the association operates or controls.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
Nasdaq does not believe that the proposed rule change will result in any burden on competition.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
Nasdaq has neither solicited nor received written comments on the proposed rule change.
III. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Persons making written submissions should file six copies thereof with the Secretary, Securities and exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549-0609. Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such filing will also be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the NASD. All submissions should refer to File No. SR-NASD-2001-32 and should be submitted by June 26, 2001.
IV. Commission's Findings and Order Grating Accelerated Approval of the Proposed Rule Change
The Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act  and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities association. Specifically, the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 15A(b)(5)  in that the proposal should provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among members and issuers and other persons using any facility or system which the Association operates or controls. In addition, the proposed rule change may further the national market system's goal in Section 11A(a)(1)(C)(iii) of assuring the availability to investors of market information.
Technological developments over the last few years have allowed vendors to provide their customers with more efficient and cost effective methods of executing securities transactions. The Commission expects that reduced market data fees will further benefit the investor by reducing the costs of executing transactions. For the investor to make sound financial decisions, efficient and inexpensive access to real-time market data information is vital. Thus, the Commission believes that a retroactive application of a permanent reduction in the non-professional market data fees should enhance investor access, and may encourage increased investor participation in the securities markets.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(2), the Commission finds good cause for approving the proposed rule change prior to the thirtieth day after the date Start Printed Page 30256of publication of notice of the filing in the Federal Register. The Commission believes that granting accelerated approval of the proposal will allow Nasdaq to expenditiously implement the permanent reduction in market data fees, on a retroactive basis, without any unnecessary delay and should confer a benefit upon those firms that provide real-time data to their customers and subscribers. The Commission also notes that it did not receive any comments on the pilot program. Accordingly, the Commission does not believe that the current filing raises any regulatory issues not raised by the previous filing.
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2)  of the Act, that the proposed rule change, as amended, (SR-NASD-2001-32) is approved on an accelerated basis.Start Signature
For the Commission, by the Division of market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority.
Margaret H. McFarland,
3. The current proposal replaces File No. SR-NASD-2001-24, which Nasdaq filed on March 30, 2001, and withdrew on April 23, 2001. See letter from Jeffrey S. Davis, Assistant General Counsel, Nasdaq, to Katherine England, Assistant Director, Division of Market Regulation (“Division”), Commission dated April 20, 2001.Back to Citation
4. The pilot program expired on April 2, 2001. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 42715 (April 24, 2000), 65 FR 52460 (May 1, 2000). In the current proposal, Nasdaq requests that the permanent adoption of the current pilot fees be made retroactive to the expiration of the pilot.Back to Citation
5. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 41499 (June 9, 1999), 64 FR 32910 (June 19, 1999).Back to Citation
7. In reviewing this proposal, the Commission has considered its impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f),Back to Citation
11. Id.Back to Citation
[FR Doc. 01-14030 Filed 6-4-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M