Western Area Power Administration, DOE.
Notice of base charge and rates.
The Deputy Secretary of the Department of Energy (DOE) has confirmed and approved the FY 2002 Base Charge and Rates (Rates) for the Boulder Canyon Project (BCP) electric service provided by the Western Area Power Administration (Western). The Rates will provide sufficient revenue to pay all annual costs, including interest expense, and repay required investment within the allowable period.
The Rates will be effective the first day of the first full billing period beginning on or after October 1, 2001. These Rates will stay in effect through September 30, 2002, or until other Rates replace them.Start Further Info
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Maher Nasir, Rates Team Lead, Western Area Power Administration, Desert Southwest Customer Service Region, 615 South 43rd Avenue, Phoenix, AZ 85009, telephone (602) 352-2768, e-mail email@example.com.End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information
The Deputy Secretary of Energy approved the existing Rate Schedule BCP-F6 for BCP electric service on September 18, Start Printed Page 472092000 (Rate Order No. WAPA-94, 65 FR 60933, October 13, 2000), on an interim basis, effective on October 1, 2000, through September 30, 2005, and allowed for an annual recalculation of the Rates. On July 31, 2001, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) approved Rate Order No. WAPA-94 on a final basis.
Under Rate Schedule BCP-F6, the existing composite rate, effective on October 1, 2000, is 9.75 mills per kilowatthour (mills/kWh), the base charge is $47,788,574, the forecasted energy rate is 5.04 mills/kWh, and the forecasted capacity rate is $0.99 per kilowattmonth (kWmonth). The newly calculated Rates for BCP electric service to be effective October 1, 2001, will result in an overall composite rate of 10.32 mills/kWh. This is an increase of approximately 6 percent when compared with the existing BCP electric service composite rate. The increase is due to a slight increase in the annual revenue requirement and lower projected energy sales. The FY 2002 base charge is increasing slightly to $48,039,988. The slight increase is due mainly to higher operation and maintenance expenses and replacement costs. The FY 2002 forecasted energy rate of 5.33 mills/kWh is approximately a 6-percent increase from the existing forecasted energy rate of 5.04 mills/kWh. The slight increase is due mainly from a projected lower water year that results in reduced projected energy sales. The FY 2002 forecasted capacity rate of $0.99/kWmonth remains the same as the existing forecasted capacity rate.
The following summarizes the steps taken by Western to ensure involvement of all interested parties in determining the Rates:
1. On February 8, 2001, a letter was mailed from Western's Desert Southwest Customer Service Region to the BCP Contractors and other interested parties announcing the informal customer meeting, and the public information and public comment forums.
2. A Federal Register notice (FRN) was published on February 13, 2001 (66 FR 10018), announcing the proposed rate adjustment process, initiating the public consultation and comment period, announcing the public information and public comment forums, and presenting procedures for public participation.
3. Discussion of the proposed Rates was initiated at an informal BCP Contractor meeting held March 21, 2001, in Phoenix, Arizona. At this informal meeting, representatives from Western and the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) explained the basis for estimates used to calculate the Rates. A question and answer session was held.
4. At the public information forum held on April 4, 2001, in Phoenix, Arizona, Western and Reclamation representatives explained the proposed Rates for FY 2002 in greater detail. A question and answer session was held.
5. A public comment forum was held on April 25, 2001, in Phoenix, Arizona, to give the public an opportunity to comment for the record. Two persons representing customers made oral comments.
6. Three comment letters were received during the 90-day consultation and comment period. The consultation and comment period ended May 14, 2001. All comments were considered in developing the Rates for FY 2002. Written comments were received from:
Arizona Power Authority
Irrigation & Electrical Districts Association of Arizona
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
Comments and responses, paraphrased for brevity, are presented below.
Civil Service Retirement Costs
Comment: A Contractor requested that Western and Reclamation cease from including the civil service retirement costs in the BCP Rates until FERC has made its final ruling on the reimbursability of these costs. The Contractor argued that Western cannot use its power revenues to augment the appropriations from outside sources without specific statutory authority. The Contractor also challenged Western's authority to fund any civil service retirement costs for employees of agencies other than Western such as Reclamation, the Corps of Engineers (Corps), and the International Boundary and Water Commission (IBWC). A Contractor stated that neither the Boulder Canyon Project Act nor the Colorado River Storage Project Act allow for the removal of money from the Colorado River Dam Fund (CRDF) to specifically satisfy the liability for the civil service retirement costs. Therefore, the BCP Contractors have concerns with the authority to collect these dollars in the CRDF. A Contractor also requested a copy of the accounting for those costs collected into the CRDF, including interest, be sent to all BCP Contractors and what has already been collected from the Contractors be refunded accordingly.
Response: On July 31, 2001, FERC issued an Order approving Rate Order No. WAPA-94, including the BCP rates for capacity and energy for FY 2001. In the Order, FERC expressly approved Western's recovery of the full civil service retirement costs in these rates, finding that such recovery was not an unlawful augmentation of appropriations, was not prohibited by the pertinent BCP legislation, and was consistent with FERC's previous approval of the collection of these costs for Western's Pacific Northwest-Pacific Southwest Intertie Project rates, 87 FERC 61,346 (June 22, 1999) and for Southeastern Power Administration's rates, 90 FERC 61,266 (March 17, 2000) and 86 FERC 61,195 (February 26, 1999). Therefore, Western will continue to collect these costs in the BCP rates. As for the Contractors' challenge to Western's authority to fund any civil service retirement costs for employees of agencies other than Western, the rates for the Desert Southwest Customer Service Region's projects do not include costs from the Corps or IBWC agencies. A copy of the accounting records to date for the collection of the civil service retirement costs was provided to the BCP Contractors prior to the close of the comment period.
Allocation of Specific Costs
Comment: A Contractor requested that Western continue to determine a fair and equitable allocation of costs for (1) the potable water and fire systems at Mead Substation, (2) the Buchanan Boulevard Project at Mead Substation, and (3) the Arizona/Nevada Switchyard.
Response: Western is committed to continue working with the Contractors in developing a fair and equitable allocation of costs for these items.
Visitor Services Expense
Comment: A Contractor requested explanation of why both the revenues and expenses for the visitor services are decreasing for FY 2003 and FY 2004.
Response: The Contractor's understanding is incorrect, as both the revenues and expenses for the visitor services are increasing for FY 2003 and FY 2004 due to indexing for inflation. It should be recognized that the estimated figures for FY 2003 and FY 2004 do not impact these Rates, as the Rates are based on FY 2002 data.
Comment: An interested party raised concerns about a $1.5 million increase in the visitor center costs, a $1.2 million increase in Reclamation's administrative and general expenses, and a $0.5 million increase in Western's system operations and dispatch costs.
Response: Western and Reclamation have explained in great detail the amount of the increases, and why the increases have incurred. Visitor service costs have increased $1.6 million to provide more security, customer service, Start Printed Page 47210and backlogged maintenance and repair items. Reclamation's administrative and general expenses have increased $1.2 million due mainly to transfers of personnel from operations to administrative and general expense. During the public forum presentations, Western specified in detail why its system operations and load dispatching costs were increasing approximately $450,000 in the proposed base charge from the existing base charge. The majority of the increase was due to the staffing of two additional full time positions, mandatory travel, training requirements, and additional costs incurred in keeping up with the pace of the utility industry changes. Since the closing of the comment and consultation period, Western has implemented a new cost distribution methodology for the operations' scheduling and dispatcher staff. The new charging methodology decreased the total operation and maintenance budget for FY 2002 by approximately $1.0 million in the proposed base charge from the existing base charge. Western has been reallocating its budget to cover costs where they are anticipated to occur.
Uprating Credit Program Process
Comment: A Contractor requested Western identify methods to ensure the BCP Uprating Credit process is being performed properly beginning in FY 2002, and the interest rate calculated for cash-funded Contractors is being determined in accordance with the BCP Implementation Agreement and associated resolutions.
Response: Western is administering the uprating credit process in accordance with the June 1996 uprating credits program written procedures and practices document. Western received a request in July 2000 to review the uprating credit process and ensure the interest rate is being calculated correctly for the cash-funded Contractors. On August 31, 2000, Western met with a working group of the BCP Contractors to address the discrepancies that were discovered in the review. Western's goal was to complete this review and recalculation process and implement any revisions to the uprating credit program by February or March 2001. Due to delays in receiving Contractors' revisions to their schedules and Western's workload constraints, completion of this task has been delayed. In the upcoming months Western will meet with the Contractors again to discuss the impacts of the discrepancies. Provided Western and the Contractors can meet and come to an agreement on the impacts and preferred method of resolution, the process would be properly in place beginning in FY 2002.
BCP Electric Service Rates
BCP electric service Rates are designed to recover an annual revenue requirement that includes the operation and maintenance expenses, payments to States, visitor services, uprating program, replacements, investment repayment, and interest expense. Western's power repayment study (PRS) allocates the projected annual revenue requirement for electric service between capacity and energy, 50 percent to capacity and 50 percent to energy.
BCP electric service Rates are developed under the Department of Energy Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 7101-7352), through which the power marketing functions of the Secretary of the Interior and the Bureau of Reclamation under the Reclamation Act of 1902 (ch. 1093, 32 Stat. 388), as amended and supplemented by subsequent enactments, particularly section 9(c) of the Reclamation Project Act of 1939 (43 U.S.C. 485h(c)), and other acts that specifically apply to the project involved, were transferred to and vested in the Secretary of Energy.
By Amendment No. 3 to Delegation Order No. 0204-108, published November 10, 1993 (58 FR 59716), the Secretary of Energy delegated (1) the authority to develop long-term power and transmission rates on a nonexclusive basis to Western's Administrator; and (2) the authority to confirm, approve, and place into effect on a final basis, to remand, or to disapprove such rates to the FERC. In Delegation Order No. 0204-172, effective November 24, 1999, the Secretary of Energy delegated the authority to confirm, approve, and place such rates into effect on an interim basis to the Deputy Secretary. Existing DOE procedures for public participation in electric service rate adjustments are located at 10 CFR part 903, effective September 18, 1985 (50 FR 37835). DOE procedures have been followed by Western in developing these Rates.
The Boulder Canyon Project Implementation Agreement Contract No. 95-PAO-10616 requires Western, prior to October 1 of each rate year, to determine the annual Rates for the next fiscal year. The Rates for the first rate year and each fifth rate year thereafter, shall become effective provisionally upon approval by the Deputy Secretary of Energy subject to final approval by FERC. For all other rate years, the Rates shall become effective on a final basis upon approval by the Deputy Secretary of Energy.
Western will continue to provide the Contractors annual Rates by October 1 of each year using the same rate setting formula. The Rates are reviewed annually and adjusted upward or downward to assure sufficient revenues to achieve payment of all costs and financial obligations associated with the project. Each fiscal year, Western prepares a PRS that updates actual revenues and expenses and includes future estimates of annual revenues and expenses for the BCP including interest and capitalized costs.
Western's BCP electric service rate setting formula was submitted to FERC for confirmation and approval on October 31, 1995. On April 19, 1996, in Docket No. EF96-5091-000 at 75 FERC 62,050, FERC issued an order confirming, approving, and placing into effect on a final basis the electric service rate setting formula for BCP. The rate setting formula set forth in Rate Order No. WAPA-70 was approved for a period beginning November 1, 1995, and ending September 30, 2000. Rate Order No. WAPA-94 extends the existing rate setting formula beginning on October 1, 2000, and ending September 30, 2005.
Western proposes the FY 2002 base charge of $48,039,988, the forecasted energy rate of 5.33 mills/kilowatthour, and the forecasted capacity rate of $0.99/kilowattmonth be approved on a final basis.
In accordance with 10 CFR part 903, Western held a consultation and comment period. The notice of the proposed FY 2002 Rates for electric service was published in the Federal Register on February 13, 2001.
Following review of Western's proposal within DOE, I approve the FY 2002 Rates, on a final basis, for BCP electric service, under Rate Schedule BCP-F6, through September 30, 2002.Start Signature
Dated: August 29, 2001.
Francis S. Blake,
[FR Doc. 01-22697 Filed 9-10-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P