This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily
Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal
Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official
electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal
Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the
corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the
daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial
informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal
Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.
For complete information about, and access to, our official publications
and services, go to
About the Federal Register
on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable
regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of
establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned
publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that
the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with
the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for
legal research should verify their results against an official edition of
the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML
rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not
provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
Notice
Enter a search term or FR citation e.g.
88 FR 38230 FR 78782024-13208USDA09/05/24RULE0503-AA39SORN
Choosing an item from
full text search results
will bring you to those results. Pressing enter in the search box
will also bring you to search results.
Choosing an item from
suggestions
will bring you directly to the content.
This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the
headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents.
This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links
has no substantive legal effect.
There is no table of contents available for this document.
Related Documents
Enhanced Content - Related Documents
FederalRegister.gov uses the agency dockets published with the document to display related documents.
Document page views are updated periodically throughout the day and are
cumulative counts for this document. Counts are subject to sampling,
reprocessing and revision (up or down) throughout the day.
Page views
26
as of
10/17/2026 at 12:15 pm EDT
Other Formats
Enhanced Content - Other Formats
This document is also available in the following formats:
This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.
Hankook Tire Manufacturing Company, Ltd. (Hankook), a Korean corporation, has determined that approximately 7,600 P205/75R14 Dayton Thorobred tires, produced in the Hankook Daejun Plant during August
( printed page 47518)
2000 through January 2001, do not meet the labeling requirements mandated by Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 109, “New Pneumatic Tires.”
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h), Hankook has petitioned for a determination that the noncompliance is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety. It has filed an appropriate report pursuant to 49 CFR part 573, “Defect and Noncompliance Reports.”
Notice of receipt of application was published, with a 30-day comment period, on April 3, 2001, in the
Federal Register
(66 FR 17747). NHTSA received no comments on this application.
The noncompliance with FMVSS No., 109, paragraph S4.3 (a) relates to a mismarking of the tire size on one mold, Serial Number 24383. The actual stamping in the bead area of the DOT serial side (normally mounted in-board) is P205/75R15 and the correct stamping should have been P205/75R14, which is stamped on the customer side of the tires (normally mounted outboard).
Hankook stated that the estimated 7,600 affected P205/75R14 Dayton Thorobred tires meet all other requirements of FMVSS No. 109. According to Hankook, there is a larger, predominant P205/75R14 correct marking on the mid-sidewall of both sides of the tires and the tire labels supplied to tire dealers with the tires are also marked with the correct tire size information. Furthermore, Hankook stated that an attempt by the company to mount the P205/75R14 tire on a 15-inch rim was unsuccessful since the mounting machine could not apply sufficient force to accomplish the mismatch. Hankook submitted that it was unaware of any adverse effects of this noncompliance and, as a result, believes the noncompliance is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety.
The agency believes that the true measure of inconsequentiality to motor vehicle safety in this case is the effect of the noncompliance on tire and rim safety. Tire and rim safety would be adversely affected if these tires, which are 14 inches in diameter, were to be mounted on 15-inch rims. Hankook stated in its petition for inconsequential noncompliance that the tires are mislabeled on one side only, the DOT serial side, which is generally mounted in-board. In addition to the labeling information in the bead area required by FMVSS No. 109, the tire size is marked in large characters in the mid-sidewall area. According to Hankook, these mid-sidewall tire size markings on both sides of the tires are correct and the new tire label supplied to tire dealers with the tires is also marked with the correct tire size. Since the tire size is marked incorrectly in one location (in-board bead) only, and correctly marked in several other locations, the agency believes it is highly unlikely that the tire size could be misunderstood by a tire service technician. According to Hankook, an attempt to mount one of these 14-inch tires on a 15-inch rim was unsuccessful because the tire-mounting machine could not generate sufficient force to mount the tire on an oversized rim. The agency believes it would highly unlikely that 14-inch diameter tires could be mounted on 15-inch rims in the event they were mistaken to be 15-inch tires. The agency has no knowledge of safety problems that have arisen as a result of tire size mislabeling when the incorrect label indicated that the tire was larger than its actual size. Based on the information provided by Hankook, the agency believes the noncompliance is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety.
In consideration of the foregoing, NHTSA has decided that the applicant has met the burden of persuasion and that the noncompliance is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety. Accordingly, Hankook's application is granted and the applicant is exempted from providing the notification of the noncompliance as required by 49 U.S.C. 30118, and from remedying the noncompliance, as required by 49 U.S.C. 30120.