Environmental Protection Agency.
The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving the section 111(d)/129 Plan submitted by the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (DHEC) on September 19, 2000, for the State of South Carolina. The section 111(d)/129 Plan for South Carolina implements and enforces the Emissions Guidelines (EG) for existing Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerator (HMIWI) units.
This final rule is effective on October 22, 2001.
Copies of all materials considered in this rulemaking may be examined during normal business hours at the following location: EPA Region 4, Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center, 61 Forsyth Street, SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960.Start Further Info
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gregory Crawford at EPA Region 4, Air Planning Branch, 61 Forsyth Street, SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960, (404) 562-9046.End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information
Table of Contents
I. What action is being taken by EPA today?
II. The HMIWI State Plan Requirement
What is a HMIWI State Plan?
Why are we requiring South Carolina to submit a HMIWI State Plan?
Why do we need to regulate air emissions from HMIWIs?
What criteria must a HMIWI State Plan meet to be approved?
III. What does the South Carolina State Plan Contain?
IV. Is My HMIWI subject to these regulations?
V. What steps Do I need to take?
VI. Significant Issues and Changes
VII. Why is the South Carolina HMIWI State Plan approvable?
VIII. Administrative Requirements
I. What Action Is Being Taken by EPA Today?
We are approving the South Carolina State Plan, as submitted on September 19, 2000, for the control of air emissions from HMIWIs, except for those HMIWIs located in Indian Country. When EPA developed our New Source Performance Standard (NSPS) for HMIWIs, we also Start Printed Page 48565developed EG to control air emissions from older HMIWIs. (See 62 FR 48348-48391, September 15, 1997, 40 CFR part 60, subpart Ce (Emission Guidelines and Compliance Times for HMIWIs) and subpart Ec (Standards of Performance for HMIWIs for Which Construction is Commenced After June 20, 1996)). The South Carolina DHEC developed a State Plan, as required by sections 111(d) and 129 of the Clean Air Act (the Act), to adopt the EG into their body of regulations, and we are acting today to approve it.
II. The HMIWI State Plan Requirement
What Is a HMIWI State Plan?
A HMIWI State Plan is a plan to control air pollutant emissions from existing incinerators which burn hospital waste or medical/infectious waste. The plan also includes source and emission inventories of these incinerators in the State.
Why Are We Requiring South Carolina To Submit a HMIWI State Plan?
States are required under sections 111(d) and 129 of the Act to submit State Plans to control emissions from existing HMIWIs in the State. The State Plan requirement was triggered when EPA published the EG for HMIWIs under 40 CFR part 60, subpart Ce (see 62 FR 48348, September 15, 1997).
Under section 129 of the Act, EPA is required to promulgate EG for several types of existing solid waste incinerators. These EG establish the Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) standards that States must adopt to comply with the Act. The HMIWI EG also establishes requirements for monitoring, operator training, permits, and a waste management plan that must be included in State Plans.
The intent of the State Plan requirement is to reduce several types of air pollutants associated with waste incineration.
Why Do We Need To Regulate Air Emissions From HMIWIs?
The State Plan establishes control requirements which reduce the following emissions from HMIWIs: particulate matter; sulfur dioxide; hydrogen chloride; nitrogen oxides; carbon monoxide; lead; cadmium; mercury; and dioxin/furans. These pollutants can cause adverse effects to the public health and the environment. Dioxin, lead, and mercury bioaccumulate through the food web. Serious developmental and adult effects in humans, primarily damage to the nervous system, have been associated with exposures to mercury. Exposure to dioxin and furans can cause skin disorders, cancer, and reproductive effects such as endometriosis. Dioxin and furans can also affect the immune system. Acid gases affect the respiratory tract, as well as contribute to the acid rain that damages lakes and harms forests and buildings. Exposure to particulate matter has been linked with adverse health effects, including aggravation of existing respiratory and cardiovascular disease and increased risk of premature death. Nitrogen oxide emissions contribute to the formation of ground level ozone, which is associated with a number of adverse health and environmental effects.
What Criteria Must a HMIWI State Plan Meet To Be Approved?
The criteria for approving a HMIWI State Plan include requirements from sections 111(d) and 129 of the Act and 40 CFR part 60, subpart B. Under the requirements of sections 111(d) and 129 of the Act, a State Plan must be at least as protective as the EG regarding applicability, emission limits, compliance schedules, performance testing, monitoring and inspections, operator training and certification, waste management plans, and recordkeeping and reporting. Under section 129(e), State Plans must ensure that affected HMIWI facilities submit Title V permit applications to the State by September 15, 2000. Under the requirements of 40 CFR part 60, subpart B, the criteria for an approvable section 111(d) plan include demonstration of legal authority, enforceable mechanisms, public participation documentation, source and emission inventories, and a State progress report commitment.
III. What Does the South Carolina State Plan Contain?
The South Carolina DHEC adopted the Federal EG and NSPS into Chapter 61 of the South Carolina Code, Regulation No. 61-62.5, Standard Number 3.1, “Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerators.” The State rules were effective on May 26, 2000. The South Carolina State Plan contains:
1. A demonstration of the State's legal authority to implement the section 111(d)/129 State Plan;
2. State rule, Standard Number 3.1, as the enforceable mechanism;
3. An inventory of approximately 4 known designated facilities, along with estimates of their potential air emissions;
4. Emission limits that are as protective as the EG;
5. A compliance date of May 26, 2001;
6. Testing, monitoring, reporting and recordkeeping requirements for the designated facilities;
7. Records from the public hearing on the State Plan; and,
8. Provisions for progress reports to EPA.
IV. Is My HMIWI Subject to These Regulations?
The EG for existing HMIWIs affect any HMIWI built on or before June 20, 1996. If your facility meets this criterion, you are subject to these regulations.
V. What Steps Do I Need To Take?
You must meet the requirements listed in South Carolina Regulation No. 61-62.5, Standard Number 3.1, summarized as follows:
1. Determine the size of your incinerator by establishing its maximum design capacity.
2. Each size category of HMIWI has certain emission limits established which your incinerator must meet. See Table I of section III (Emission Limitations) of Standard Number 3.1, to determine the specific emission limits which apply to you. The emission limits apply at all times, except during startup, shutdown, or malfunctions, provided that no waste has been charged during these events.
3. There are provisions to address small rural incinerators (if your unit is applicable).
4. You must meet a 10% opacity limit on your discharge, averaged over a six-minute block.
5. You must have a qualified HMIWI operator available to supervise the operation of your incinerator. This operator must be trained and qualified through a State-approved program, or a training program that meets the requirements listed under Section IX (Operator Training and Qualification Requirements) of Standard Number 3.1.
6. Your operator must be certified, as discussed in 5 above, no later than May 26, 2001.
7. You must develop and submit to South Carolina DHEC a waste management plan. This plan must be developed under guidance provided by the American Hospital Association publication, An Ounce of Prevention: Waste Reduction Strategies for Health Care Facilities, 1993, and must be submitted to South Carolina DHEC no later than 60 days following the initial performance test for the affected unit.
8. You must conduct an initial performance test to determine your incinerators compliance with these emission limits. This performance test must be completed no later than May Start Printed Page 4856626, 2001, and as required under 40 CFR 60.37e and Section IV (Performance Specifications) of Standard Number 3.1.
9. You must install and maintain devices to monitor the parameters listed under Table IV of Section V (Monitoring Requirements) of Standard 3.1.
10. You must document and maintain information concerning pollutant concentrations, opacity measurements, charge rates, and other operational data. This information must be maintained for a period of five years.
11. You must submit an annual report to South Carolina DHEC containing records of annual equipment inspections, any required maintenance, and unscheduled repairs. This annual report must be signed by the facilities manager.
VI. Significant Issues and Changes?
A total of one comment letter was received during the public comment period for the proposed Plan approval, which ended on June 6, 2001. The issues are summarized below and addressed in a comment and response document contained in the docket:
(1) The commenter questioned why South Carolina Regulation No. 61-62.5, Standard Number 3.1, Section VII, subparagraph (c)(8) contained the requirements of § 60.56c(i) for the approval of site-specific operating parameters to be established during the initial performance test and continuously monitored thereafter. Section 129 of the Act requires section 111(d)/129 State plans to be “at least as protective as the guidelines.” In accordance with the section 111(d), section 129, subpart B, and subpart Ce requirements, the South Carolina regulation, specifically subparagraph (c)(8), includes the § 60.56c(i) requirements, in order for the State plan for South Carolina to be deemed an approvable section 111(d)/129 plan for implementing the emission guidelines for HMIWI.
(2) The commenter questioned why South Carolina Regulation No. 61-62.5, Standard Number 3.1, Section VII, subparagraph (a)(1) requires HMIWI facilities constructed before June 20, 1996, to perform a source test no later than 12 months following the effective date of the State standard. Section 60.24(g) of subpart B allows any State to adopt or enforce “compliance schedules requiring final compliance at earlier times than those specified in subpart C or in applicable guideline documents.” In accordance with the subpart B requirements, the South Carolina regulation, specifically subparagraph (a)(1), includes a compliance schedule earlier than specified in subpart Ce.
(3) These comments raise no specific issues or arguments affecting approval of the South Carolina section 111(d)/129 plan.
VII. Why Is the South Carolina HMIWI State Plan Approvable?
EPA compared the South Carolina rules (Chapter 61 of the South Carolina Code, Regulation No. 61-62.5, Standard Number 3.1) against our HMIWI EG. EPA finds the South Carolina rules to be at least as protective as the EG. The South Carolina State Plan was reviewed for approval against the following criteria: 40 CFR 60.23 through 60.26, Subpart B—Adoption and Submittal of State Plans for Designated Facilities; 40 CFR 60.30e through 60.39e, Subpart Ce—Emission Guidelines and Compliance Times for Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerators; and, 40 CFR 62.14400 through 62.14495, Subpart HHH—Federal Plan Requirements for Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerators Constructed on or before June 20, 1996. The South Carolina State Plan satisfies the requirements for an approvable section 111(d)/129 plan under subparts B and Ce of 40 CFR part 60 and subpart HHH of 40 CFR part 62. For these reasons, we are approving the South Carolina HMIWI State Plan.
VIII. Administrative Requirements
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this action is not a “significant regulatory action” and therefore is not subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211, “Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use” (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4).
This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have Federalism implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action merely approves a state rule implementing a Federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 “Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks” (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a “major rule” as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).Start Printed Page 48567
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by November 20, 2001. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2)).Start List of Subjects
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62
- Environmental protection
- Administrative practice and procedure
- Air pollution control
- Intergovernmental relations
- Reporting and recordkeeping requirements
- Waste treatment and disposal
Dated: September 7, 2001.
A. Stanley Meiburg,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:End Amendment Part Start Part
PART 62—[AMENDED]End Part Start Amendment Part
1. The authority citation for part 62 continues to read as follows:End Amendment Part
Subpart PP—South CarolinaStart Amendment Part
2. Section 62.10100 is amended by adding paragraphs (b)(5) and (c)(5) to read as follows:End Amendment Part
(b) * * *
(5) South Carolina Designated Facility Plan (Section 111(d)/129) for Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerators, submitted on September 19, 2000, by the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control.
(c) * * *
(5) Existing hospital/medical/infectious waste incinerators.
3. Subpart PP is amended by adding a new § 62.10170 and a new undesignated center heading to read as follows:End Amendment Part
Air Emissions From Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerators
The plan applies to existing hospital/medical/infectious waste incinerators for which construction, reconstruction, or modification was commenced before June 20, 1996, as described in 40 CFR part 60, subpart Ce.
[FR Doc. 01-23604 Filed 9-20-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P