Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
Direct final rule.
EPA is taking direct final action to approve revisions to the operating permit program of the State of West Virginia. West Virginia's operating permit program was submitted in response to the Clean Air Act (CAA) Amendments of 1990 that required States to develop, and submit to EPA, programs for issuing operating permits to all major stationary sources and to certain other sources within the States' jurisdiction. The EPA granted final interim approval of West Virginia's operating permit program on November 15, 1995. West Virginia has revised its operating permit program since receiving interim approval and this action approves those revisions. Any parties interested in commenting on this action proposing to approve discretionary revision to West Virginia's title V operating permit program should do so at this time. A more detailed description of West Virginia's submittal and EPA's evaluation are included in a Technical Support Document (TSD) in support of this rulemaking action. A copy of the TSD is available, upon request, from the EPA Regional Office listed in the ADDRESSES section of this document.
This rule is effective on November 23, 2001 without further notice, unless EPA receives adverse written comment by November 8, 2001. If EPA receives such comments, it will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register and inform the public that the rule will not take effect.
Written comments may be mailed to Makeba Morris, Chief, Permits and Technical Assessment Branch, Mailcode 3AP11, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the documents relevant to this action are available for public inspection during normal business hours at the Air Protection Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103 and West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection, Office of Air Quality, 1558 Washington Street, East, Charleston, West Virginia, 25311.Start Further Info
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Campbell, Permits and Technical Assessment Branch at (215) 814-2196 or by e-mail at campbell.dave@.epa.gov.End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information
On June 1, 2001, the State of West Virginia submitted amendments to its State operating permit program. These amendments are the subject of this document and this section provides additional information on the amendments by addressing the following questions:
What is the State operating permit program?
What is being addressed in this document?
What is not being addressed in this document?
What changes to West Virginia's operating permit program is EPA approving?
What action is being taken by EPA?
What Is the State Operating Permit Program?
The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 required all States to develop operating permit programs that meet certain federal criteria. When implementing the operating permit programs, the States require certain sources of air pollution to obtain permits that contain all of their applicable requirements under the Clean Air Act (CAA). The focus of the operating permit program is to improve enforcement by issuing each source a permit that consolidates all of its applicable CAA requirements into a federally-enforceable document. By consolidating all of the applicable requirements for a given air pollution source into an operating permit, the source, the public, and the State environmental agency can more easily understand what CAA requirements apply and how compliance with those requirements is determined.
Sources required to obtain an operating permit under this program include “major” sources of air pollution and certain other sources specified in the CAA or in EPA's implementing regulations. For example, all sources regulated under the acid rain program, regardless of size, must obtain operating permits. Examples of “major” sources include those that have the potential to emit 100 tons per year or more of volatile organic compounds, carbon monoxide, lead, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, or particulate matter (PM10); those that emit 10 tons per year of any single hazardous air pollutant (HAP) specifically listed under the CAA; or those that emit 25 tons per year or more of a combination of HAPs. In areas that are not meeting the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for ozone, carbon monoxide, or particulate matter, major sources are defined by the gravity of the nonattainment classification.
What Is Being Addressed in This Document?
On June 1, 2001, West Virginia submitted revisions to its currently EPA-approved title V operating permit program. In general, West Virginia made minor technical and administrative corrections to its existing operating permit program regulations. The revisions consist primarily of typographical and editorial corrections to definitions and other program elements. These program revisions were submitted pursuant to 40 CFR 70.4(i) which provides that a State with an approved program may initiate a program revision when the relevant State regulations are modified or supplemented. West Virginia's operating permit program received interim approval in 1995. West Virginia has modified and supplemented its permit program regulations since that time. West Virginia submitted the revisions for EPA action according to 40 CFR 70.4(i)(2)(iii).
What Is Not Being Addressed in This Document?
As part of its June 1, 2001 submittal, West Virginia also provided amendments to its operating permit program regulations to address deficiencies identified by EPA when it granted final interim approval of West Virginia's program in 1995. Since these program amendments are not directly relevant to this rulemaking action approving revisions to West Virginia's operating permit program, they are being considered in a separate rulemaking action.
On December 11, 2000, EPA announced a 90-day comment period for members of the public to identify deficiencies they perceive exist in State and local agency operating permits programs. [See 65 FR 77376.] The public was able to comment on all currently-approved operating permit programs, regardless of whether they have been granted full or interim approval. The EPA Region III did not receive comments germane to West Virginia's currently-approved operating permit program.
What Changes to West Virginia's Program Is EPA Approving?
The EPA has reviewed West Virginia's June 1, 2001 program revisions in conjunction with the portion of West Virginia's program that was earlier approved by EPA. Based on this review, Start Printed Page 51319EPA is approving revisions to West Virginia's operating permit program. The EPA has determined that the revisions to West Virginia's operating permit program appropriately clarify and improve the currently approved version of its program. The revisions fully meet the minimum requirements of 40 CFR part 70.
In general, West Virginia revised its permit program regulations in order to clarify certain definitions and minor procedural matters. The following describes the revisions made to West Virginia's operating permit program.
Changes to West Virginia's Operating Permit Program
1. Minor renumbering of sections has occurred.
2. Added section 1.5.
3. In section 2.7, removed “§ 111 or” from the definition of “Area source”.
4. In section 2.12, clarified definition by adding, “such other person to whom the director has delegated authority of duties pursuant to W.Va. Code §§ 22-1-6 or 22-1-8” and revised capitalization.
5. In section 2.13, removed “that Division of” and revised capitalization.
6. In section 2.38.c, revised “part” to “rule”.
7. Removed parentheses at the beginning of the last sentence of section 4.1.a.2.
8. In section 4.3.c.1, “subsection” revised to “subdivision”.
9. In section 5.1.j.3, revised “part” to “rule”.
10. In section 5.9.f, revised “reivew” to “review”.
11. In section 6.4.c, revised “part” to “rule”.
12. In section 6.5.a.5, revised “permitee” to “permittee”.
13. Removed section 12.2 pursuant to federal regulations implementing section 112(g) of the CAA deleting the requirement to do a case-by-case technology-based standard for existing sources which modify their facilities.
14. Removed “Caprolactam” from Table 45-30A.
What Action Is Being Taken by EPA?
The State of West Virginia submitted revisions to its operating permit program on June 1, 2001 in order to clarify and improve certain aspects of its program. The operating permit program revisions that are the subject of this document considered together with that portion of West Virginia's operating permit program that was earlier approved by EPA fully satisfy the minimum requirements of 40 CFR part 70 and the Clean Air Act. Therefore, EPA is taking direct final action to approve revisions to the State of West Virginia's title V operating permit program in accordance with 40 CFR 70.4(i)(2)(iii).
The EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates no adverse comment. However, in the “Proposed Rules” section of today's Federal Register, EPA is publishing a separate document that will serve as the proposal to approve the operating permit program approval if adverse comments are filed relevant to the issues discussed in this action. This rule will be effective on November 23, 2001 without further notice unless EPA receives adverse comment by November 8, 2001. If EPA receives adverse comment, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take effect. The EPA will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this time. Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.
A. General Requirements
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this action is not a “significant regulatory action” and therefore is not subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211, “Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use” (66 FR 28355 (May 22, 2001)). This action merely approves State law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes no additional requirements beyond those imposed by State law. Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this rule approves pre-existing requirements under State law and does not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by State law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4). This rule also does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999), because it merely approves a State rule implementing a Federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant.
In reviewing State operating permit program submissions, EPA's role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority to disapprove an operating permit program submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews an operating permit program submission, to use VCS in place of an operating permit program submission that otherwise satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. As required by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61 FR 4729, February 7, 1996), in issuing this rule, EPA has taken the necessary steps to eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity, minimize potential litigation, and provide a clear legal standard for affected conduct. The EPA has complied with Executive Order 12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15, 1988) by examining the takings implications of the rule in accordance with the “Attorney General's Supplemental Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk and Avoidance of Unanticipated Takings' issued under the executive order. This rule does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Start Printed Page 51320
B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This rule is not a “major rule” as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by December 10, 2001. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action approving revisions to West Virginia's title V operating permit program may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)Start List of Subjects
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 70
- Administrative practice and procedure
- Air pollution control
- Environmental protection
- Intergovernmental relations
- Operating permits
- Reporting and recordkeeping requirements
Dated: September 25, 2001.
Donald S. Welsh,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
Appendix A of part 70 of title 40, chapter I, of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:End Amendment Part Start Part
PART 70—[AMENDED]End Part Start Amendment Part
1. The authority citation for part 70 continues to read as follows:End Amendment Part Start Amendment Part
2. Appendix A to part 70 is amended by adding paragraph (d) in the entry for West Virginia to read as follows:End Amendment Part Start Appendix
Appendix A to Part 70—Approval Status of State and Local Operating Permits Programs
(d) The West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection submitted program revisions on June 1, 2001. The rule revisions contained in the June 1, 2001 submittal revise West Virginia's existing approved program. The State is hereby granted revised approval effective on November 23, 2001.
[FR Doc. 01-24711 Filed 10-5-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P