SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The supplemental information is organized in the following order.

I. Rule Revisions Being Approved by EPA in This Action

II. Revised IBR Format for Jefferson County, Kentucky Being Approved by EPA in This Action

III. Final Action

IV. Administrative Requirements

I. Rule Revisions Being Approved by EPA in This Action

The Commonwealth, through KNREPC, submitted to EPA revisions to the Jefferson County portion of the Kentucky SIP, as adopted by APCDJC, on February 3, 1998, September 22, 1998, February 11, 1999, May 21, 1999, July 20, 1999 and September 22, 2000. The revisions include amendments and modifications of APCDJC regulations to ensure consistency with existing CAA and EPA requirements. The revisions also include a recodification that renumbers APCDJC rule sections to make the SIP less complex and corrects typographical errors, capitalization, spelling, and punctuation. Finally, today's action removes existing APCDJC regulations that do not need to be included in the SIP. Some of these regulations are no longer applicable because they have been moved to other portions of the Kentucky SIP, or because APCDJC submitted negative declarations verifying that there are no existing sources in Jefferson County subject to these rules. The remaining regulations removed were incorrectly approved into the Kentucky SIP (i.e. regulations that EPA does not enforce, or that EPA enforces pursuant to other parts of the Code of Federal Regulations).

On June 21, 2001 (66 FR 33216), EPA published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR) to approve the above revisions. That NPR provided for a public comment period ending on July 23, 2001. A detailed description of the SIP revisions and EPA's rationale for approving them was provided in the NPR and will not be restated here.

II. Revised IBR Format for Jefferson County, Kentucky Being Approved by EPA in This Action

In this final action, EPA is also revising the format of 40 CFR part 52 for materials submitted by the Commonwealth that are IBR into the Jefferson County portion of the Kentucky SIP. These revisions are consistent with the SIP compilation requirements of section 110(h)(1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) and the May 22, 1997, (62 FR 27968) Federal Register , in which EPA revised the procedures for IBR federally-approved SIP regulations.

The new SIP compilation for Jefferson County will consist of two parts: the federally-approved portion of regulations and source-specific SIP revisions submitted by the Commonwealth. The table identifying federally-approved regulations is provided with this Federal Register . The table identifying source-specific SIP revisions will be provided at a later date. All of these regulations have been approved by EPA through previous rule making actions in the Federal Register , or are being approved in this action or other actions being published in today's Federal Register . Each part has a table of contents identifying each regulation or each source-specific SIP revision. The table of contents in the compilation corresponds to the table of contents published in 40 CFR part 52 for the Commonwealth. A copy of the full text of the Commonwealth's current compilation will also be maintained at the Office of Federal Register and EPA's Air Docket and Information Center.

By today's final action, EPA is also revising the organization of the “Identification of plan” section. The revised Identification of plan section will still contain five subsections: (a) Purpose and scope, (b) Incorporation by reference, (c) EPA approved regulations, (d) EPA-approved source specific requirements, and (e) EPA-approved nonregulatory provisions, such as transportation control measures, statutory provisions, control strategies, monitoring networks, etc. However, subsection (b) is being amended to include an EPA approval date for Jefferson County, Kentucky regulations, and subsection (c) is being amended to add a table for EPA-approved Jefferson County regulations for Kentucky. All revisions to the applicable SIP become ( printed page 53659) federally enforceable as of the effective date of the revisions to paragraphs (c), (d) or (e) of the applicable identification of plan found in each subpart of 40 CFR part 52.

III. Final Action

EPA is approving revisions to the Jefferson County portion of the Kentucky SIP that were adopted by the APCDJC and submitted to EPA on February 3, 1998; September 22, 1998; February 11, 1999; May 21, 1999; July 20, 1999; and September 22, 2000 by the Commonwealth through KNREPC. EPA is partially approving revisions to APCDJC Regulation 2.04 Construction or Modification of Major Sources in or Impacting upon Non-Attainment Areas (Emission Offset Requirements). As described in detail in the NPR, EPA is taking no action on subsection 3.2 of this regulation regarding applicability of the offset requirement, because this language conflicts with existing EPA policy. EPA finds that Kentucky's submittals are otherwise fully approvable. EPA is also revising the format of 40 CFR part 52 for materials submitted by the Commonwealth that are IBR into the Jefferson County portion of the Kentucky SIP.

IV. Administrative Requirements

Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this action is not a “significant regulatory action” and therefore is not subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211, “Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use” (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action merely approves state law as meeting federal requirements and imposes no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4).

This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have Federalism implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action merely approves a state rule implementing a Federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the CAA. This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 “Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks” (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant.

In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. In this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise satisfies the provisions of the CAA. Thus, the requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).

The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. section 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register . A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register . This action is not a major rule as defined by 5 U.S.C. section 804(2).

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by December 24, 2001. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

Part 52 of chapter I, title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, is amended as follows:

1. The authority for citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

2. Section 52.920 is amended:

a. By revising paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(2).

b. By adding a table to the end of paragraph (c).

The revision and addition read as follows: