Department of the Navy, DOD.
The Department of the Navy is amending its certifications and exemptions under the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972 (72 COLREGS), to reflect that the Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate General of the Navy (Admiralty and Maritime Law) has determined that U.S.S. Tempest (PC 2) is a vessel of the Navy which, due to its special construction and purpose, cannot fully comply with certain provisions of the 72 COLREGS without interfering with its special function as a naval ship. The intended effect of this rule is to warn mariners in waters where 72 COLREGS apply.
September 17, 2000.Start Further Info
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Commander Gregg A. Cervi, JAGC, U.S. Navy, Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate General (Admiralty and Maritime Law), Department of the Navy, Office of the Judge Advocate General, 1322 Patterson Avenue, Suite 3000, Washington Navy Yard, DC 20374-5066, Telephone number: (202) 685-5040.End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information
Pursuant to the authority granted in 33 U.S.C. 1605, the Department of the Navy amends 32 CFR part 706. This amendment provides notice that the Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate General of the Navy (Admiralty and Maritime Law), under authority delegated by the Secretary of the Navy, has certified that U.S.S. Tempest (PC 2) is a vessel of the Navy which, due to its special construction and purpose, cannot fully comply with the following specific provisions of 72 COLREGS without interfering with its special function as a naval ship: Rule 21(c) pertaining to the placement of the stern light as nearly as practicable at the stern. The Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate General of the Navy (Admiralty and Maritime Law) has also certified that the light involved is located in closest possible compliance with the applicable 72 COLREGS requirements.
Moreover, it has been determined, in accordance with 32 CFR parts 296 and 701, that publication of this amendment for public comment prior to adoption is impracticable, unnecessary, and contrary to public interest since it is based on technical findings that the placement of lights on this vessel in a manner differently from that prescribed herein will adversely affect the vessel's ability to perform its military functions.Start List of Subjects
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 706End List of Subjects Start Amendment Part
Accordingly,End Amendment Part Start Part
PART 706—[AMENDED]End Part Start Amendment Part
1. The authority citation forEnd Amendment Part Start Amendment Part
2. Table Three of § 706.2 is amended by revising the entry for U.S.S.End Amendment Part
|Vessel||No.||Masthead lights arc of visibility; rule 21(a)||Side lights arc of visibility; rule 21(b)||Stern light arc of visibility; rule 21(c)||Side lights distance inboard of ship's sides in meters; 3(b) annex 1||Stern light, distance forward of stern in in meters; rule 21(c)||Forward anchor light, height above hull in meters; 2(K) annex 1||Anchor lights relationship of aft light to forward light in meters; 2(K) annex 1|
|TEMPEST||PC 2||28.26 1||3.01||1.1 below|
|1 Only when towing.|
Dated: September 7, 2000.
Commander, JAGC, U.S. Navy, Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate General (Admiralty and Maritime Law).
[FR Doc. 01-26640 Filed 10-22-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P