Veterans' Employment and Training Service, Department of Labor.
Interim final rule; request for comments.
The Veterans' Employment and Training Service (VETS) is amending its regulations implementing the VETS-100 reporting requirement. This amendment revises the final rule that was published on October 11, 2001 (66 FR 51998), and that went into effect on November 13, 2001, to withdraw from the rule the specification for how Federal contractors filing the report were to calculate the maximum and minimum number of employees. The basic requirement to report the maximum and minimum number of employees remains.
Effective Date: This regulation is effective December 19, 2001.
Comment Period: Comments must be received on or before January 18, 2002.
Comments should be sent to Norman Lance, Chief, Investigations and Compliance Division, VETS, by regular mail at the U.S. Department of Labor, Veterans' Employment and Training Service, Federal Contractor Program FRN-Comments—Interim Final Rule, Federal Contractor Program Office, 6101 Stevenson Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22304, or by e-mail at Lance-Norman@dol.gov. Written comments limited to 10 pages or fewer also may be transmitted by facsimile (FAX) at (202) 693-4755. Receipt of submissions, whether by U.S. mail, e-mail or FAX transmittal, will not be acknowledged; however, the sender may request confirmation that a submission has been received, by telephoning VETS at (202) 693-4731(VOICE)Start Further Info
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Norm Lance, Chief, Investigations and Compliance Division, VETS, at (202) 693-4731 or by e-mail at Lance-Norman@dol.gov. Individuals with hearing impairments may call (800) 670-7008 (TTY/TDD).End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information
The Veterans Employment Opportunities Act (VEOA) was signed into law in October 1998. The statute extended the affirmative action and reporting responsibilities of Federal contractors and subcontractors. Among other changes, the VEOA added the requirement that contractors and subcontractors report the maximum number and the minimum number of persons they employed during the reporting period to the Secretary of Labor.
On October 5, 2000, VETS published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (65 FR 59684) to implement the provisions of the VEOA, including the requirement for reporting the minimum and maximum number of employees. The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking did not contain guidance on how covered contractors were to determine the minimum and maximum number of employees. One commenter asked for clarification about how to determine the minimum and maximum number of employees. The commenter asserted that there could be continuous changes in employment levels at a company and that it was unclear exactly when the minimum and maximum number of employees had to be determined. To respond to the concerns of the commenter, VETS clarified the regulation language by adding the following language to the final rule:
The minimum and maximum number of employees reportable at each hiring location during the period covered by the report must be determined as follows: Contractors must review payroll records for each of the pay periods included in the report. The minimum number of employees is the total number of employees paid in the payroll period in which the contractor had the fewest number of employees. The maximum number of employees is the total number of employees paid in the payroll period in which the contractor had the greatest number of employees.
This new language was inserted in section 61-250.10(a)(3), and also in section 61-250.11 under the paragraph entitled “Maximum and minimum number of employees.” (66 FR 52004-52005, October 11, 2001).
It has been brought to the attention of VETS that the revised language might have inadvertently increased the record keeping burden on some contractors. VETS has learned that it might be difficult to match up payroll periods, employees, and physical VETS-100 reporting locations in the way contemplated by the final rule. For example, some companies use separate payrolls and pay dates for nonexempt and exempt employees within a single establishment. Other companies maintain separate payrolls and pay dates for bargaining unit employees and nonbargaining unit employees. Some companies temporarily remove employees who are on short-term leaves of absence from their payrolls. These absent employees, however, still may be considered “active” employees for purposes of the VETS-100 report.
To permit contractors flexibility in how they determine the maximum and minimum number of employees, VETS is making two amendments to part 61-250. In each place in which the instructions quoted above were placed in the rule, the instructions now are being withdrawn. Accordingly, contractors will be required to report the maximum and minimum number of Start Printed Page 65453employees, but the method by which the count must be conducted will not be mandated.
However, VETS expressly requests comments on the methods contractors intend to use to calculate the minimum and maximum number of employees. VETS plans on publishing this information, either in regulatory format or as guidance to contractors, for future reporting cycles.
II. Revised Sections
Section 250.10 What Reporting Requirements Apply to Federal Contractors and Subcontractors, and What Specific Wording Must the Reporting Requirements Contract Clause Contain?
Section 61-250.10(a)(3). The language quoted above that specified how contractors were to determine the maximum number and minimum number of employees is withdrawn. Contractors are still obligated to provide a count of the maximum and minimum number of employees. However, contractors may use any reasonable method for calculating and determining the maximum number and minimum number of employees during the reporting period.
Section 61-250.11 On What Form Must the Data Required by This Part Be Submitted?
The language quoted above, which appears as a paragraph entitled “Maximum and minimum number of employees” under section 250.11, is withdrawn. All other instructions in this section on how to prepare the VETS-100 report remain intact.
III. Regulatory Procedures
Executive Order 12866
The Department of Labor has determined that this Interim Final Rule is not economically significant as defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act. However, this rule has been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866. This rule will not: (1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more, or adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or communities; (2) create a serious inconsistency, or otherwise interfere, with an action taken or planned by another agency; (3) materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs, or the rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in Executive Order 12866. Therefore, a regulatory impact analysis is unnecessary.
Congressional Review Act
This Interim Final Rule is not a major rule for purposes of the Congressional Review Act.
Executive Order 12875—This Interim Final Rule does not create an unfunded Federal Mandate upon any State, local, or tribal government.
Unfunded Mandate Reform Act of 1995—This Interim Final Rule does not include any Federal mandate that may result in increased expenditures by State, local and tribal governments in the aggregate of $100 million or more, or increased expenditures by the private sector of $100 million or more.
These regulations have been reviewed in accordance with Executive Order 13132 regarding Federalism. This rule will not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, the requirements of section 6 of Executive Order 13132 do not apply to this rule.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This Interim Final Rule does not substantially change the existing obligations of Federal contractors or subcontractors. The Department of Labor certifies that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small business entities. Therefore, no regulatory flexibility analysis is required.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The inclusion of guidelines in the October 11, 2001, final rule on how to determine the minimum and maximum number of employees may have inadvertently resulted in greater burden than that reflected in the rule. By removing the portion of the rule that specified how the minimum and maximum number of employees was to be computed, this Interim Final Rule restores the burden to that reflected in the final rule.
Absence of Notice of Proposed Rulemaking/Effective Date of This Interim Rule
The Department of Labor has determined that it is unnecessary and contrary to the public interest to publish a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) regarding this amendment. This Interim Final Rule will prevent covered contractors from having to comply with a possibly significant and inadvertent increase in their recordkeeping burdens. The portion of the October 11 rule that is being removed simply provided information on how the maximum and minimum number of employees was to be computed; removing that information nevertheless retains unchanged the fundamental statutory requirement that contractors report their maximum and minimum employment.
For the above-listed reasons, the Department of Labor finds that publishing an NPRM, and providing a period for notice and comment, before implementing this Interim Final Rule is unnecessary and contrary to the public interest, and therefore pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) good cause exists for publishing these regulations as an Interim Final Rule. Furthermore, the Department finds that the above-listed reasons also constitute good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) for waiving the customary requirement to delay the effective date of a regulation for 30 days following its publication. Therefore, this Interim Final Rule is effective immediately upon publication.Start List of Subjects
List of Subjects in 41 CFR Part 61-250End List of Subjects Start Signature
Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of December 2001.
Frederico Juarbe, Jr.,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Veterans' Employment and Training Service.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble,End Amendment Part Start Part
PART 61-250—ANNUAL REPORT FROM FEDERAL CONTRACTORSEnd Part Start Amendment Part
1. The authority citation for part 61-250 continues to read as follows:End Amendment Part
2. Section 250.10 is amended in the contract clause by removing all of paragraph (a)(3) except for the first sentence.End Amendment Part
3. Section 250.11 is amended in the contract clause by removing the paragraph entitled “End Amendment Part End Supplemental Information
[FR Doc. 01-31188 Filed 12-18-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-79-P