National Labor Relations Board.
The National Labor Relations Board is amending its regulations governing stipulated record cases to delete an outdated procedure for filing stipulated records with its Administrative Law Judges and to substitute an alternative procedure governing stipulated record cases filed either with the Board or with an Administrative Law Judge.
Effective: January 7, 2002.Start Further Info
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
John J. Toner, Executive Secretary, (202) 273-1936.End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information
Section 102.35(a)(9) of the National Labor Relations Board's rules provides for a limited form of stipulation before Administrative Law Judges in which, following a hearing, transcripts are dispensed with and exceptions to findings of fact are waived. 29 CFR 102.35(a)(9). This provision was adopted several decades ago. It is never used today and was not used much at the time it was adopted. For this reason, the Board has decided to eliminate this procedure from its rules.
The Board has, on occasion, permitted parties to file stipulated records directly with it along with requests that the stipulated cases be decided without an evidentiary hearing. Typically these are cases in which the facts are not in dispute and the parties wish expedited consideration of what they perceive to be purely legal issues. Because this practice has never been memorialized in the Board's rules, the Board is adding it now. The same practice will also be made available in proceedings before Administrative Law Judges.
In describing the procedures for submitting a stipulation of facts, the rule states that a statement of the issues presented should be set forth in the stipulation and that each party should also submit a short statement (no more than three pages) of its position on the issues. The Board's experience with stipulations of facts has been that, while the parties know the contested issues and their positions on those issues, a mere stipulation of facts by itself may not be sufficient to convey that important information to the Board. Including a statement of issues in the stipulation of facts and submitting a short statement of each party's position on those issues will assist the Board in determining whether it wishes to decide a case without the benefit of a full hearing and a judge's decision.
For these reasons, the Board has decided to eliminate the former Section 102.35(a)(9) and subtitute for it a brief statement outlining the procedures for submitting stipulated records to it or to its Administrative Law Judges.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Because no notice of proposed rule-making is required for procedural rules, the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) pertaining to regulatory flexibility analysis do not apply to these rules. However, even if the Regulatory Flexibility Act were to apply, the NLRB certifies that these rules will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small business entities as they merely permit parties to a Board proceeding to submit requests to have cases decided on a stipulated record.
Executive Order 12866
The regulatory review provisions of Executive Order 12866 do not apply to independent regulatory agencies. However, even if they did, the proposed changes in the Board's rules would not be classified as “significant rules”' under Section 6 of Executive Order 12866, because they will not result in (1) an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more; (2) a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, or local government agencies, or geographic regions; or (3) significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or on the ability of United States-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises in domestic or foreign markets. Accordingly, no regulatory impact assessment is required.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100,000,000 or more in any one year, and it will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as defined by section 804 of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996. This rule will not result in an annual effect on the economy of $100,000,000 or more; a major increase in costs or prices; or significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or on the ability of United States based companies to compete with foreign-based companies in domestic and export markets.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This part does not impose any reporting or record keeping requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.Start List of Subjects
List of Subjects in 29 CFR Part 102End List of Subjects Start Amendment Part
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the National Labor Relations Board is amending 29 CFR Chapter I, Part 102, as follows:End Amendment Part Start Part
PART 102—RULES AND REGULATIONS, SERIES 8End Part Start Amendment Part
1. The authority citation for part 102 continues to read as follows:End Amendment Part Start Amendment Part
2. Section 102.35 is amended by revising the heading and by further revising paragraph (a)(9) to read as follows:End Amendment Part
(a) * * *
(9) To approve stipulations, including stipulations of facts that waive a hearing and provide for a decision by the administrative law judge. Alternatively, the parties may agree to waive a hearing and decision by an administrative law judge and submit directly to the Executive Secretary a stipulation of facts, which, if approved, provides for a decision by the Board. A statement of the issues presented should be set forth in the stipulation of facts and each party should also submit a short statement (no Start Printed Page 657more than three pages) of its position on the issues. If the administrative law judge (or the Board) approves the stipulation, the administrative law judge (or the Board) will set a time for the filing of briefs. In proceedings before an administrative law judge, no further briefs shall be filed except by special leave of the administrative law judge. In proceedings before the Board, answering briefs may be filed within 14 days, or such further period as the Board may allow, from the last date on which an initial brief may be filed. No further briefs shall be filed except by special leave of the Board. At the conclusion of the briefing schedule, the judge (or the Board) will decide the case or make other disposition of it.
Dated, Washington, DC, December 21, 2001.
By direction of the Board.
John J. Toner,
Executive Secretary, National Labor Relations Board.
[FR Doc. 02-80 Filed 1-4-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7545-01-P