Rural Utilities Service, USDA.
In an effort to continually look for ways to streamline requirements of borrowers and make regulations simple and direct, the Rural Utilities Service (RUS) proposes to eliminate regulations on Exceptions of RUS Operational Controls under Section 306E of the RE Act in its entirety. Because borrowers are now afforded the same exemptions from RUS operational controls by way of other provisions, RUS has determined that the regulations can now be removed.
Written comments must be received by RUS or carry a postmark or equivalent no later than June 24, 2002.
Written comments should be addressed to F. Lamont Heppe, Jr., Director, Program Development and Regulatory Analysis, Rural Utilities Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, STOP 1522, 1400 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20250-1522. RUS requests a signed original and three copies of all comments (7 CFR 1700.4). Comments will be available for public inspection during regular business hours (7 CFR 1.27(b)).Start Further Info
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Patrick R. Sarver, Management Analyst, Rural Utilities Service, Electric Program, Room 4024 South Building, Stop 1560, 1400 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20250-1560, Telephone: 202-690-2992, FAX: 202-690-0717, E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org.End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information
Executive Order 12866
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for purposes of Executive Order 12866 and, therefore, has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
Executive Order 12372
This rule is excluded from the scope of Executive Order 12372, Intergovernmental Consultation, which may require consultation with State and local officials. See the final rule related notice titled “Department Programs and Activities Excluded from Executive Order 12372” (50 FR 47034) advising that RUS loans and loan guarantees from coverage were not covered by Executive Order 12372.
This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. RUS has determined that this proposed rule meets the applicable standards provided in section 3 of the Executive Order. In addition, all state and local laws and regulations that are in conflict with this rule will be preempted; no retroactive effect will be given to this rule, and, in accordance with section 212(e) of the Department of Agriculture Reorganization Act of 1994 (7 U.S.C. 6912 (e)), administrative appeals procedures, if any are required, must be exhausted before and action against the Department or its agencies.
Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification
In accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the Administrator of RUS has determined that this rule will not have significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. The RUS electric loan program provides loans and loan guarantees to borrowers at interest rates and terms that are more favorable than those generally available from the private sector. Small entities are not subjected to any requirements, which are not applied equally to large entities. RUS borrowers, as a result of obtaining federal financing, receive economic benefits that exceed any direct cost associated with RUS regulations and requirements.
Information Collection and Recordkeeping Requirements
This rule contains no additional information collection or recordkeeping requirements under OMB control number 0572-0032 that would require approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
This proposed rule contains no Federal mandates (under the regulatory provision of title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act) for State, local, and tribal governments or the private sector. Thus, this proposed rule is not subject to the requirements of sections 202 and 205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act.
National Environmental Policy Act Certification
The Administrator of RUS has determined that this proposed rule will not significantly affect the quality of human environment as defined by the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). Therefore, this action does not require an environmental impact statement or assessment.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The program described by this proposed rule is listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Programs under No. 10.850, Rural Electrification Loans and Loan Guarantees. This catalog is available on a subscription basis from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402-9325, telephone number (202) 512-1800.
RUS currently treats the general subject of operational controls for recipients of electric loans and guarantees in three separate places, namely in RUS loan documents, in 7 CFR part 1717, subpart M, and in 7 CFR 1710.7. In the interests of eliminating confusion and to continue in its ongoing program to streamline RUS regulations, RUS is proposing to remove 7 CFR 1710.7. An understanding of how RUS treatment of operational controls evolved in the 1990's is essential to understanding this action.
In November of 1993, Congress enacted sec. 306e of the Rural Start Printed Page 36543Electrification Act of 1936 (RE Act)(7 U.S.C. 936e), directing RUS to be “guided by the practices of private lenders” to “minimize the approval rights, requirements and restrictions, and prohibitions that the Secretary otherwise may establish with respect to the operations” of any electric borrower whose net worth exceeds 110 percent of the outstanding principal balance on loans made or guaranteed by RUS (Pub. L. 103-129 2(c)(7)). In December 1993, Congress made technical corrections to the act and effectively directed the Administrator to issue “interim final regulations” to implement sec. 306e within 180 days (Pub. L. 103-201). RUS did so on January 28, 1994 (59 FR 3982), thereby creating 7 CFR 1710.7. Members of the class of electric borrowers subject to this regulation are commonly referred to as “110 percent borrowers.”
On December 29, 1995 (60 FR 67395), RUS published a final rule substantially revising the forms of its loan documents to extend the benefits of the treatment of 110 percent borrowers to virtually all RUS borrowers. That exercise made the most comprehensive changes to RUS loan documents in over 20 years and was guided by the practices of private lenders. Consequently, regardless of whether they were entitled to treatment as 110 percent borrowers, all borrowers using the updated forms of loan documents enjoyed their more contemporary treatment of the subject of operational controls. That treatment closely followed the treatment of 110 percent borrowers in 7 CFR 1710.7. In the same rulemaking, RUS promulgated 7 CFR part 1717, subpart M, which also treated the subject of operational controls. Subpart M was intended to manage the transition from old style loan documents to the more contemporary new forms in an orderly and equitable way. RUS was concerned that all of its borrowers would simultaneously request replacement of their existing loan documentation with the new forms. Constraints on RUS resources necessitated the phasing in of the new loan documents. RUS managed its concerns by promulgating subpart M to conform the requirements for existing loan documents to those being used in the new forms. Borrowers who have not yet replaced their loan documents with the new forms are referred to as “legacy” borrowers.
In the preamble to that 1995 rulemaking, RUS explained the relationship between these three separate treatments of the subject of operational controls: “The provisions of the new mortgage and loan contract and 7 CFR part 1717, subpart M, in many cases provide greater latitude to borrowers than established originally in 7 CFR 1710.7 for 110 percent borrowers. Therefore, § 1710.7 has been revised to reflect the greater latitude provided in the new loan documents and Subpart M.”
RUS also concluded that in its “judgement” and citing “prudent private lending practices,” the further relaxation of operational controls for 110 percent borrowers was not justified beyond what was provided for every borrower in the new loan documents and in subpart M for “legacy” borrowers. In other words, by changing 7 CFR 1710.7 only so far as necessary to avoid the anomaly of 110 percent borrowers being subjected to more restrictive covenants under 7 CFR 1710.7 then they otherwise would have been as a typical borrower operating under the new documents and regulations, RUS made operational controls for 110 percent borrowers coextensive with the relaxed operational controls in the new loan documents and subpart M. Thus, for all intents and purposes, on December 29, 1995, the treatment of operational controls for all three categories of electric borrowers converged around the less intrusive approach adopted by the new loan documents reflecting private lending practices.
Since 1995, almost all RUS electric borrowers have executed the new loan documents. About 100 electric borrowers still have the old forms, but the distinctions in operational controls have been eliminated by subpart M. It should also be noted that every 110 percent electric borrower either now has the new form of loan documents or has “legacy” loan documents, which have been modified by the promulgation of subpart M. Accordingly, the subject of operational controls is now treated essentially the same way for all distribution borrowers regardless of their 110 percent borrower status. In all instances, that treatment has been guided by the practices of private lenders. Since that treatment of operational controls conforms to the requirements of sec. 306e of the RE Act, 7 CFR 1710.7 now appears to be an anachronism that no longer serves any useful purpose.
RUS notes that sec. 306e of the RE Act also treats the subject of lien accommodations and subordinations for 110 percent borrowers. Although this remains important, the subject of lien accommodations and subordinations for 110 percent borrowers is separately treated in 7 CFR 1717.860 and 7 CFR 1717.904. Although 7 CFR 1717.904 contains some cross-references to 7 CFR 1710.7(c), these appear to be merely reader's aids. Accordingly, RUS proposes to amend 7 CFR 1717.904 by eliminating paragraphs (c) and (d) thereof and redesignating the existing paragraph (e) as paragraph (c). RUS considers these changes in 7 CFR 1717.904 to be of a conforming nature and no substantive change in the existing treatment of requests for lien accommodations or subordinations by 110 percent borrowers is intended. No changes in 7 CFR 1717.860 are necessitated by the proposed action and so none are being made.
For all of the above reasons, it appears that 7 CFR 1710.7 has become an anachronism because the subsequent promulgation of new loan documents and subpart M effectively conferred the benefits of 7 CFR 1710.7 to all borrowers. Borrowers who are relying on subpart M are encouraged to switch to the new forms of loan documents so that subpart M itself can eventually be removed at a later date once the universe of legacy borrowers has sufficiently contracted to the point that any remaining legacy borrowers could be dealt with either informally or on a case-by-case basis. RUS does not believe this proposed action will diminish or abrogate any rights or privileges conferred upon 110 percent borrowers by sec. 306e of the RE Act, and no such consequences are intended.Start List of Subjects
List of Subjects
- Electric power
- Electric utilities
- Loan programs—energy
- Reporting and recordkeeping requirements
- Rural areas
- Administrative practice and procedure
- Electric power
- Electric power rates
- Electric utilities
- Intergovernmental relations
- Loan programs—energy
- Reporting and recordkeeping requirements
- Rural areas
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, chapter X of title 7 of the Code of Federal Regulations, is proposed to be amended as follows:Start Part
PART 1710—GENERAL AND PRE-LOAN POLICIES AND PROCEDURES COMMON TO INSURED AND GUARANTEED ELECTRIC LOANS
1. The authority citation for part 1710 continues to read as follows:Start Printed Page 36544
2. Section 1710.7 is removed and reserved.
PART 1717—POST-LOAN POLICIES AND PROCEDURES COMMON TO INSURED AND GUARANTEED ELECTRIC LOANS
3. The authority citation for part 1717 continues to read as follows:
Subpart S—Lien Accommodations for Supplemental Financing Required by 7 CFR 1710.110
4. Section 1717.904 is amended by removing paragraphs (c) and (d) and redesignating paragraph (e) as paragraph (c).
Dated: May 20, 2002.
Curtis M. Anderson,
Acting Administrator, Rural Utilities Service.
[FR Doc. 02-13102 Filed 5-23-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-15-P