This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily
Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal
Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official
electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal
Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the
corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the
daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial
informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal
Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.
For complete information about, and access to, our official publications
and services, go to
About the Federal Register
on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable
regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of
establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned
publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that
the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with
the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for
legal research should verify their results against an official edition of
the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML
rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not
provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
Rule
Enter a search term or FR citation e.g.
88 FR 38230 FR 78782024-13208USDA09/05/24RULE0503-AA39SORN
Choosing an item from
full text search results
will bring you to those results. Pressing enter in the search box
will also bring you to search results.
Choosing an item from
suggestions
will bring you directly to the content.
This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the
headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents.
This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links
has no substantive legal effect.
Document page views are updated periodically throughout the day and are
cumulative counts for this document. Counts are subject to sampling,
reprocessing and revision (up or down) throughout the day.
Page views
15
as of
10/12/2026 at 4:15 am EDT
Other Formats
Enhanced Content - Other Formats
This document is also available in the following formats:
This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.
AGENCY:
Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION:
Final rule; clarification.
SUMMARY:
This document clarifies that Internet protocol relay services (IP Relay) fall within the definition of Telecommunications Relay Services (TRS). Because there is no automatic method for determining if a call placed over IP Relay is intrastate or interstate, we authorize IP Relay providers to recover their costs from the Interstate TRS Fund on an interim basis, until such time as we decide whether and how a methodology can be devised to allocate cost recovery between the Interstate TRS Fund and the states. This document also waives certain TRS minimum standards for IP Relay, and directs the National Exchange Carriers Association, which is the current administrator of the Interstate TRS Fund, to begin paying cost recovery to eligible providers of Internet-based TRS, upon release of this
Declaratory Ruling
by the Commission.
DATES:
Effective April 22, 2002.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sean O'More, of the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-2453 (voice), (202) 418-7870 (TTY), or e-mail
scomore@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
This is a summary of the Commission's
Declaratory Ruling,
adopted April 18, 2002, and released April 22, 2002. Copies of any subsequently filed documents in this matter will be available for public inspection and copying during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. The complete text of this decision also may be purchased from the Commission's duplicating contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554, telephone (202) 863-2893, facsimile (202) 863-2898, or via e-mail
qualexint@aol.com.
Copies of this document in other alternative formats (computer diskette, large print, and Braille) are available to persons with disabilities by contacting Brian Millin, of the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-7426 (voice), (202) 418-7365 (TTY), or e-mail
bmillin@fcc.gov.
This
Declaratory Ruling
can also be downloaded in Text and ASCII formats at:
http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/dro.
Synopsis
In this
Declaratory Ruling,
the Commission responds to a
Petition for Clarification
filed by WorldCom, Inc., requesting that we clarify that WorldCom's IP Relay is TRS, and is therefore eligible for recovery of its costs of providing TRS. We find that because IP Relay and other Internet-based TRS “provide[s] the ability for an individual who has a hearing impairment or a speech impairment to engage in communication by wire or radio with a hearing individual,” 47 U.S.C. 225(a)(3), such service is TRS, and are eligible for cost recovery. Ordinarily, “costs caused by interstate [TRS] shall be recovered from all subscribers for every interstate service and costs caused by intrastate [TRS] shall be recovered from the intrastate jurisdiction.” 47 U.S.C. 225(d)(3)(B). There is, however, no automatic means of determining the origination of IP Relay calls. In the absence of this information, TRS providers cannot determine, or report to the TRS Fund Administrator, whether a call is interstate or intrastate. Therefore, as an interim measure, we authorize providers of IP Relay to recover costs from the Interstate TRS Fund. We also waive certain TRS minimum standards,
see47 CFR 64.604.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Certification
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended (RFA), requires that a regulatory flexibility analysis be prepared for notice-and-comment rule making proceedings, unless the agency certifies that “the rule will not, if promulgated, have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.” The RFA,
see5 U.S.C. 601-612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Public Law No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). 5 U.S.C. 605(b). The RFA generally defines the term “small entity” as having the same meaning as the terms “small business,” “small organization,” and “small governmental jurisdiction.” 5 U.S.C. 601(6). In addition, the term “small business” has the same meaning as the term “small business concern” under the Small Business Act. 5 U.S.C. 601(3) (incorporating by reference the definition of “small-business concern” in the Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C. 632). Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 601(3), the statutory definition of a small business applies “unless an agency, after consultation with the Office of Advocacy of the Small Business Administration and after opportunity for public comment, establishes one or more definitions of such term which are appropriate to the activities of the agency and publishes such definition(s) in the
Federal Register
.” A “small business concern” is one which: (1) Is independently owned and operated; (2) is not dominant in its field of operation; and (3) satisfies any additional criteria established by the Small Business Administration (SBA). 15 U.S.C. 632.
This
Declaratory Ruling
addresses a Petition for Clarification (
Petition) filed by WorldCom, Inc. (WorldCom) in December of 2000. WorldCom, Petition for Clarification, CC Docket No. 90-571,
Telecommunications Services for Individuals with Hearing and Speech Disabilities,
Dec. 22, 2000. This
Petition
requests that the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) clarify that Internet Protocol (IP) telecommunications relay services (TRS) are eligible for reimbursement from the Interstate Telecommunications Relay Service Fund. The Commission sought comments on the WorldCom Petition in a Public Notice. Consumer Information Bureau Seeks Additional Comment on the Provision of Improved Telecommunications Relay Service, DA 01-1555,
Public Notice,
16 FCC Rcd 13100, Jun. 29, 2001; published at 66 FR 37631, Jul. 19, 2001. As a result of the WorldCom
Petition
and filed public comments, the Commission is issuing this
Declaratory Ruling
which will allow WorldCom to recover such costs.
As noted in paragraph 59 of the
Declaratory Ruling,
this item imposes a regulatory burden on the Interstate TRS Fund Administrator, requiring it to pay qualified providers of IP telecommunications relay services (TRS) for their costs caused by their TRS. The Interstate TRS Fund is a not-for-profit organization, and therefore is a “small organization.” A small organization is generally “any not-for-profit enterprise which is independently owned and operated and is not dominant in its field.” 5 U.S.C. 601(4). Nationwide, as of 1992, there were approximately 275,801 small
( printed page 39864)
organizations. U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, 1992, Table 6 (special Tabulation of data under contract of the Office of Advocacy of the U.S. Small Business Administration). Because the Interstate TRS Fund is the only entity affected by the
Declaratory Ruling,
we conclude that a “substantial number” of small entities will not be affected by the
Declaratory Ruling.
Therefore, we certify that the requirements of this
Declaratory Ruling
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The Commission will send a copy of the
Declaratory Ruling,
including a copy of this Final Regulatory Flexibility Certification, in a report to Congress pursuant to the Congressional Review Act.
See5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A). In addition, the
Declaratory Ruling
and this final certification will be sent to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the SBA, and will be published in the
Federal Register
.
See
5.U.S.C. 605(b).
Ordering Clauses
Accordingly,
it is ordered
that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1,2, and 225 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 151, 152 and 225, this
Declaratory Ruling is adopted.
It is further ordered
that WorldCom's
Petition for Clarification is granted
to the extent indicated herein.
It is further ordered
that the waivers requested by WorldCom in its
Petition for Clarification,
regarding certain of the minimum standards for TRS contained in 47 CFR 64.604,
ARE GRANTED,
to the extent indicated herein.
It is further ordered
that the Administrator of the Interstate Fund, the National Exchange Carriers Association,
shall
upon release of this
Declaratory Ruling
by the Commission, pay eligible providers of IP Relay the costs of providing IP Relay using the PSTN-based TRS formula rate per minute.
It is further ordered
that the Commission's Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau, Reference Information Center,
shall send
a copy of this
Declaratory Ruling,
including the Final Regulatory Flexibility Certification, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration