Start Preamble

AGENCIES:

Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration (GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

ACTION:

Final rule.

SUMMARY:

The Civilian Agency Acquisition Council and the Defense Acquisition Regulations Council (Councils) have agreed on a final rule amending the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to incorporate policies for disputes in schedule contracts and the handling of incidental items, and to remove the requirement to notify GSA when a schedule contractor refuses to honor an order placed by a Government contractor.

DATES:

Effective Date: July 29, 2002.

Start Further Info

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

The FAR Secretariat, Room 4035, GS Building, Washington, DC, 20405, (202) 501-4755, for information pertaining to status or publication schedules. For clarification of content, contact Ms. Linda Nelson, Procurement Analyst, at (202) 501-1900. Please cite FAC 2001-08, FAR case 1999-614.Start Printed Page 43515

End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A. Background

DoD, GSA, and NASA published a proposed rule in the Federal Register at 65 FR 79702, December 19, 2000. Nine respondents submitted comments in response to the Federal Register notice. The public comments were received from contractors, professional associations, and Federal agencies. Clarifying revisions have been made to FAR 8.401(d) and 8.405-7(d) of the rule as a result of the public comments. A summary of the significant comments and concerns expressed by respondents is summarized below.

• Addition of Open Market, Noncontract Items on a Schedule Order. Some respondents believed that the intent regarding the incorporation of open market, noncontract items on a schedule order needed further clarification and recommended alternative language. The Councils agreed that absent a definition of “open market” or “noncontract” items in the FAR further clarification is needed. Accordingly, it has substituted the expression “items not on the Federal Supply Schedule” to best characterize what these items mean.
• Inclusion of FAR Part 19 in the Listing of Applicable Acquisition Regulations. One respondent expressed concern regarding the omission of a reference to FAR Part 19, Small Business Programs, in the proposed language in FAR 8.401(d) for adding open market, noncontract items to a Federal Supply Schedule BPA. The respondent believes that the omission of FAR Part 19 in the list of applicable acquisition regulations an agency must follow will allow ordering offices to circumvent the requirement that all procurements valued between $2,500 and $100,000 be set aside for small business concerns.

The Councils agreed that FAR Part 19 should be included in the list of applicable regulations in FAR 8.401(d)(1). Even though FAR 13.003(b)(1) addresses small business set-asides for acquisitions above the micro-purchase threshold, the inclusion of FAR Part 19, in addition to FAR Part 13, further emphasizes that ordering offices must consider small business programs when acquiring items not on the Federal Supply Schedule.

• FAR Reference to Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Procedures for Schedule Disputes. One respondent suggested that in lieu of the proposed language in FAR 8.405-7(d) (“The contracting officer should use the alternative dispute resolution (ADR) procedures, when appropriate (see 33.214)”), the language should be revised to cite the policy statement as it is set forth in FAR 33.204, that ADR should be used “to the maximum extent practicable.” The respondent further suggested that either FAR 33.204 be cited alone, or that 33.204 be cited in addition to 33.214. Since the language in FAR 33.204 speaks to policy regarding the use of ADR, while 33.214 provides additional information regarding ADR, the Councils agreed that, for clarity, both citations be included in the final rule, and that the language in FAR 8.405-7(d) be revised.

This is not a significant regulatory action, and therefore, was not subject to review under Section 6(b) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804.

B. Regulatory Flexibility Act

The Department of Defense, the General Services Administration, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration certify that this final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., because the rule addresses internal Government administrative procedures and does not impose any additional requirements on Government offerors or contractors.

C. Paperwork Reduction Act

The Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply because the changes to the FAR do not impose information collection requirements that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.

Start List of Subjects

List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 8 and 51

• Government procurement

End List of Subjects Start SignatureEnd Signature Start Amendment Part

Therefore, DoD, GSA, and NASA amend

End Amendment Part Start Amendment Part

1. The authority citation for

End Amendment Part Start Authority

Authority: 40 U.S.C. 486(c); 10 U.S.C. chapter 137; and 42 U.S.C. 2473(c).

End Authority Start Part

PART 8—REQUIRED SOURCES OF SUPPLIES AND SERVICES

End Part Start Amendment Part

2. Amend section 8.401 by adding paragraph (d) to read as follows:

End Amendment Part Start Amendment Part

3. Revise section 8.405-7 to read as follows:

End Amendment Part Start Printed Page 43516 Start Part

PART 51—USE OF GOVERNMENT SOURCES BY CONTRACTORS

End Part Start Amendment Part

4. Amend section 51.103 by removing paragraph (b); and by redesignating paragraph (c) as (b).

End Amendment Part End Supplemental Information