On July 3, 2001, the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (“NYSE” or “Exchange”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission” or “SEC”), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”) and Rule 19b-4 thereunder, a proposed rule change to amend NYSE Rule 72(b) to (i) permit clean crosses of 100,000 shares or more when a member organization is facilitating a customer order; and (ii) provide that a specialist may not effect a proprietary transaction to break up a cross being effected under the Rule. The proposal was published for notice and comment in the Federal Register on November 6, 2001. The Commission received three comments on the proposal. On January 29, 2002, the NYSE responded to the comments.
On June 18, 2002, the NYSE amended the proposal by removing the proposed amendment to Rule 72(b) relating to clean crosses of 100,000 shares or more. This order approves the proposed rule change. Also, Amendment No. 1 is approved on an accelerated basis.
II. Description of the Proposed Rule Change
As a result of Amendment No. 1, the proposed rule change consists only of the NYSE's amendment of NYSE Rule 72(b) to provide that a specialist may not effect a proprietary transaction to provide price improvement to one side of a clean cross or the other. The Exchange understands that there may be a perception that specialists can break up a proposed cross transaction by trading for their own account at a minimally improved price, and, thereby, step ahead of a public customer on the other side of the cross. The NYSE believes the proposed rule change, as amended, will preserve the auction market principle of price improvement, since non-proprietary interest of specialists and particular Floor brokers in the market may offer price improvement at any minimum variation.
III. Discussion and Commission Findings
The Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange  and, in particular, the Start Printed Page 48500requirements of Section 6 of the Act  and the rules and regulations thereunder. The Commission finds specifically that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act  in that the Rule is designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. The Commission believes that the proposed rule change, while eliminating the opportunity for specialists to effect a proprietary transaction to provide price improvement to one side of a clean cross or the other, preserves the auction market principle of price improvement by continuing to allow non-proprietary interest of specialists and particular Floor brokers in the market to offer price improvement at any minimum variation.
The Commission finds good cause for approving Amendment No. 1 before the 30th day after the date of publication of notice of filing thereof in the Federal Register. Amendment No. 1 simply removes the provision from the original filing that would have allowed clean crosses of 100,000 shares or more when a member organization is facilitating a customer order. This provision was the focus of the comment letters. Because Amendment No. 1 removes this provision, the Commission believes it is appropriate to approve Amendment No. 1 on an accelerated basis. For these reasons, the Commission finds good cause for accelerating approval of Amendment No. 1.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and arguments concerning Amendment No. 1, including whether Amendment No. 1 is consistent with the Act. Persons making written submissions should file six copies thereof with the Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549-0609. Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such filing will also be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the NYSE. All submissions should refer to file number SR-NYSE-2001-18 and should be submitted by August 14, 2002.
V. Conclusion and Order
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, that the proposed rule change (SR-NYSE-2001-18), including Amendment No. 1, is approved.Start Signature
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority.
Margaret H. McFarland,
4. See November 27, 2001 letter from Craig S. Tyle, General Counsel, Investment Company Institute, to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary, SEC (“ICI Letter”); December 18, 2001 letter from Thomas N. McManus, Executive Director and Counsel, Morgan Stanley (“Morgan Stanley Letter”); February 11, 2002 letter from Alton B. Harris, Ungaretti & Harris (“Ungaretti Letter”). All of the comment letters focused on the provision allowing clean crosses of 100,000 shares or more when a member organization is facilitating a customer order. This provision was subsequently deleted from the proposed rule change. See footnote 6, infra. The Commission reviewed the comment letters. Because the letters pertained to those portions of the original proposed rule change that were subsequently removed by Amendment No. 1, the Commission has not included a summary of comments in this order.Back to Citation
5. See January 29, 2002 letter from Darla C. Stuckey, Corporate Secretary, NYSE, to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary, SEC (“NYSE Response Letter”).Back to Citation
6. See June 14, 2002 letter from Darla C. Stuckey, Corporate Secretary, NYSE, to Nancy J. Sanow, Assistant Director, Division of Market Regulation, SEC and attachments (“Amendment No. 1”).Back to Citation
7. In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).Back to Citation
[FR Doc. 02-18697 Filed 7-23-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P