Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
EPA has determined that the Wallula nonattainment area in Washington has attained the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of less than or equal to a nominal ten micrometers as of December 31, 2001, as required by the Clean Air Act.
This rule will become effective on November 21, 2002.
Copies of all information supporting this action are available for public inspection and copying between 8:30 a.m. and 3:30 p.m., Pacific Standard Time at EPA Region 10, Office of Air Quality, 10th Floor, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98101. A reasonable fee may be charged for copies.Start Further Info
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Donna Deneen, Office of Air Quality, EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle Washington, 98101, (206) 553-6706.End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information
On September 3, 2002, EPA solicited public comment on a proposal to find that the Wallula nonattainment area had attained the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of less than or equal to 10 microns (PM10) by the attainment date of December 31, 2001, as required by the Clean Air Act. See 67 FR 56249.
The Wallula area was designated nonattainment for PM10 and classified as moderate under sections 107(d)(4)(B) and 188(a) of the Clean Air Act upon enactment of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (Act or CAA) with an attainment date of December 31, 2001. See 40 CFR 81.348 (PM10 Initial Start Printed Page 64816Nonattainment Areas); see also 56 FR 56694 (November 6, 1991). EPA later granted the area a temporary waiver of the moderate area attainment date, which extended the attainment date to December 31, 1997. See 62 FR 3800 (January 27, 1997).
On February 9, 2001, EPA made a final determination that the Wallula area had not attained the PM10 standard by the moderate area attainment date of December 31, 1997. See 66 FR 9663 (February 9, 2001) (final action); (65 FR 69275 (November 16, 2000) (proposed action). EPA made this determination based on air quality data for calendar years 1995, 1996, and 1997. As a result of that finding, the Wallula PM10 nonattainment area was reclassified by operation of law as a serious PM10 nonattainment area effective March 12, 2001, with an attainment date of December 31, 2001. See sections 188(b)(2)(A) and 188(c)(2).
Pursuant to sections 179(c) of the CAA, we have the responsibility of determining within six months of the applicable attainment date whether, based on air quality data, PM10 nonattainment areas attained the PM10 NAAQS by the attainment date. Determinations under section 179(c)(1) of the Act are to be based upon the area's “air quality as of the attainment date.” Three consecutive years of air quality data are generally required to show attainment of the annual and 24-hour standards for PM10. See 40 CFR part 50 and appendix K.
As discussed in the proposal, the Wallula monitor recorded no violations of the annual PM10 standard for the three-year period from 1999 though 2001. EPA therefore proposed to determine that the Wallula area attained the annual PM10 standard as of the serious area attainment date of December 31, 2001. See 67 FR 56250.
With respect to the 24-hour PM10 standard, there were two exceedences of the 24-hour PM10 standard recorded at the Wallula monitor during the period of 1999 through 2001: A concentration of 297 μg/m3 on June 23, 1999, and a concentration of 215 μg/m3 on August 10, 2000. Washington flagged both of these exceedances as attributable to high wind “natural events.” Under section 107(d)(4)(B)(ii) of the CAA and 40 CFR part 50, appendix K, section 2.4, specific exceedances due to uncontrollable natural events, such as unusually high winds, may be discounted or excluded entirely from decisions regarding an area's air quality status in appropriate circumstances. See Memorandum from EPA's Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation to EPA Regional Air Directors entitled “Areas Affected by Natural Events,” dated May 30, 1996 (EPA's Natural Events Policy). EPA has stated that it will treat ambient PM10 exceedances caused by dust raised by unusually high winds as due to uncontrollable natural events (and thus excludable from attainment determinations) if either (1) the dust originated from nonanthropogenic sources or (2) the dust originated from anthropogenic sources controlled with best available control measures (BACM). See Natural Events Policy, pp. 4-5.
As discussed in detail in the proposal, based on information submitted by Washington and other information available to EPA, EPA proposed to find that the exceedances that occurred on June 23, 1999 and August 10, 2000, as well as two previous exceedances on June 21, 1997 and July 10, 1998 (which had also been flagged by Washington as high wind events), qualify as high wind natural events under EPA's Natural Events Policy. Therefore, EPA proposed to exclude the 1999 and 2000 exceedences from consideration in determining whether the Wallula PM10 nonattainment area attained the 24-hour as of December 31, 2001 and to find that the area had attained the 24-hour PM10 standard as of that date. See 67 FR 56250-56252. EPA noted, however, that identification and application of BACM for agricultural lands is evolving and that EPA expects Washington to continue efforts in identifying and implementing BACM on sources of agricultural windblown dust in the Wallula area in order for future exceedances caused by high winds to be characterized as “natural events” and excluded in attainment determinations. See 67 FR 56252. EPA received no comments in response to its September 3, 2002 proposal.
II. Final Action
EPA has determined that the Wallula PM10 nonattainment area attained the PM10 NAAQS as of the serious area attainment date of December 31, 2001 and that the exceedances that occurred on June 21, 1997, July 10, 1998, June 23, 1999, and August 10, 2000 qualify as high wind natural events under EPA's Natural Events Policy.
Consistent with CAA section 188, the Wallula nonattainment area will remain a serious PM10 nonattainment area, but will avoid the additional planning requirements that apply to serious PM10 nonattainment areas that fail to meet the attainment date under section 189(d) of the CAA. This finding of attainment should not be confused with a redesignation to attainment under CAA section 107(d). Washington has not submitted a serious area plan for the Wallula area that meets the requirements of section 189(b) of the CAA. In addition, Washington has not submitted a maintenance plan as required under section 175(A) of the CAA or met the other CAA requirements for redesignations to attainment. The designation status in 40 CFR part 81 will remain serious nonattainment for the Wallula PM10 nonattainment area until such time as Washington meets the CAA requirements for redesignations to attainment.
III. Administrative Requirements
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this action is not a “significant regulatory action” and therefore is not subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211, “Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use” (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action merely makes a determination based on air quality data and does not impose any requirements. Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this finding will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this finding does not impose any enforceable duty, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4).
This finding also does not have tribal implications because it will not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have Federalism implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action merely makes a determination based on air quality data and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of power Start Printed Page 64817and responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. This finding also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 “Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks” (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant.
The requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply because this action does not involve technical standards. This finding does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a “major rule” as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by December 23, 2002. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. See CAA section 307(b)(2).Start List of Subjects
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 81End List of Subjects Start Signature
Dated: October 10, 2002.
Ronald A. Kreizenbech,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 10.
1. Because the Wallula monitor is scheduled to sample only once every six days, each measured exceedance is generally counted as six expected exceedances and would generally represent a violation of the 24-hour PM10 standard.Back to Citation
[FR Doc. 02-26847 Filed 10-21-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P